Comparative legal analysis of processes of merger and accession of economic organizations in national and foreign legislation (EU, UK, USA)

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/2523-4153.2023.283562

Keywords:

reorganization, economic organization, company, merger, accession, consolidation, takeover, amalgamation, acquisition, M&A

Abstract

Taking into account Provisions of the Association Agreement between Ukraine and the EU in the field of legislation on companies and corporate governance, which leads to the regulation of the activities of corporations, in particular the regulation of the processes of reorganization of economic organizations at the national level to the requirements of international standards and a gradual rapprochement with the rules and recommendations of the EU, a comparative legal research of the process of merger and accession of economic organizations today seems necessary and actual.

It is distinguished, general and distinctive qualifying signs of merger and accession of economic organizations, which will be used to improve the concepts provided to these processes. It is substantiated that mergers and accessions are independent forms of reorganization of economic organizations.

The comparative legal analysis of legislation of Ukraine with the legislation of the EU, the Member States of the EU (Belgium, Germany, France), Great Britain and the USA on the issues of reorganization in the form of merger and accession is provided and the following main conclusions are made:

in the legislation of the EU and in the legislation of the EU Member States there are two ways of merging: (1) “merger by acquisition”/ “merger to an existing company” and (2) “merger by the formation of a new company”/ “merger to a new company”, which in its essence corresponds to such domestic forms of reorganization as “accession” and “merger”, accordingly;

in the legislation of the EU, Great Britain, as well as EU member states, such a category as “accession” is not allocated as an independent legal form of reorganization of the company, but is considered as a kind of “merger” category;

in US Law, merger processes of two or more corporations are indicated by terms such as “merger” and “consolidation”; US Tax Law applies the concept of “corporate reorganization”, which has 7 types of reorganizations (A-G), among which there are one of the types – a type A “statutory merger or consolidation”, which in its essence corresponds to the processes of merger and accession, which is inherent in domestic legislation;

in the legislation of foreign countries, the concepts of “merger”, “consolidation”, “amalgamation”, “acquisition”, “takeover” are similar to each other; in economic essence relate to the forms of business consolidation; act as an instrument to increase the competitiveness of the company; from a legal point of view differ from each other – according to the procedure;

in the legislation and practice of foreign countries, the variety of processes such as “merger”, “consolidation”, “amalgamation”, “acquisition”, “takeover” is covered by a single economic and legal phenomenon, as “Merger and Acquisition” or M&A, which by the legal nature of the concluded agreements is much wider than such domestic forms of reorganization of economic organizations as “merger” and “accession” and is not always accompanied by the implementation of reorganization process

Author Biography

Nataliia Shcherbakova, Vasyl’ Stus Donetsk National University

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Civil Law and Procedure

References

  1. Uhoda pro asotsiatsiiu mizh Ukrainoiu, z odniiei storony, ta Yevropeiskym Soiuzom, Yevropeiskym spivtovarystvom z atomnoi enerhii i yikhnimy derzhavamy-chlenamy, z inshoi storony (2014). Ofitsiinyi vinyk Ukrainy, 1 (75), 2125.
  2. Burakovskyi, I., Movchan, V. (Ed.) (2014). Ekonomichna skladova Uhody pro asotsiatsiiu mizh Ukrainoiu ta YeS: naslidky dlia biznesu, naselennia ta derzhavnoho upravlinnia (Zvit pidhotovlenyi u ramkakh proektu «Ekonomichnyi komponent Uhody pro Asotsiatsiiu mizh Ukrainoiu ta YeS: profesiinyi analiz ta publichna dyskusiia»). Kyiv: Instytut ekonomichnykh doslidzhen i politychnykh konsultatsii, 141.
  3. Belianevych, O. A. (2020). Pytannia pravonastupnytstva pry reorhanizatsii subiekta hospodariuvannia shliakhom zlyttia. Available at: https://coordynata.com.ua/pitanna-pravonastupnictva-pri-reorganizacii-subekta-gospodaruvanna-slahom-zlitta Last accessed: 25.06.2023
  4. Vinnyk, O. M., Shcherbyna, V. S. (2000). Aktsionerne pravo. Kyiv: Atika, 544.
  5. Zhekov, D. V. (2015). Prypynennia yurydychnykh osib za tsyvilnym zakonodavstvom Ukrainy. Odesa, 20.
  6. Yefymenko, A. (2002). Harmonizatsiia zakonodavstva Ukrainy ta YeS u sferi rehuliuvannia diialnosti ta bukhhalterskoi zvitnosti tovarystv. Yurydychnyi zhurnal, 3, 23–26.
  7. Kibenko, O. R. (2005). Yevropeiske korporatyvne pravo na etapi fundamentalnoi reformy: perspektyvy vykorystannia yevropeiskoho zakonodavchoho dosvidu u pravovomu poli Ukrainy. Kharkiv: Straik. 432.
  8. Kravchuk, V. (2005). Korporatyvne pravo. Kyiv: Istyna, 656.
  9. Kucherenko, I. M. (2004). Orhanizatsiino-pravovi formy yurydychnykh osib. Kyiv: DP «Iuryd. vyd-vo «Asta», 327.
  10. Sishchuk, L. V. (2015). Reorhanizatsiia yurydychnykh osib: teoretyko-pravovi aspekty. Pryvatne pravo i pidpryiemnytstvo, 14, 32–36.
  11. Yurkevych, Yu. M. (2009). Prypynennia yurydychnykh osib z pravonastupnytstvom. Lviv, 209.
  12. Thuronyi, V. (1998). Tax Law Design and Drafting. Vol. 2. International Monetary Fund. Chapter 20. Taxation of Corporate Reorganizations, 20. doi: https://doi.org/10.5089/9781557756336.071
  13. Gaughan, P. A. (2018). Mergers, Acquisitions, and Corporate Restructurings. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 660.
  14. Hannigan, B. (2015). Company Law. Fourth Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 840.
  15. Vesely, W. J. (1968). A Reorganizations – Statutory Mergers and Consolidations, 19 Case W. Rsrv. L. Rev. 975, 975–989. Available at: https://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/caselrev/vol19/iss4/10 Last accessed: 04.05.2023
  16. Tsyvilnyi kodeks Ukrainy vid 16 sichnia 2003 roku No. 435-IV (2003). Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy, 40, 356. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/435-15#Text
  17. Hospodarskyi kodeks Ukrainy vid 16 sichnia 2003 roku No. 436-IV (2003). Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy, 18, 19-20, 21-22, 144. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/436-15#Text
  18. Pro aktsionerni tovarystva (2022). Zakon Ukrainy No. 2465-IX. 27.07.2022. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2465-20
  19. Pro tovarystva z obmezhenoiu ta dodatkovoiu vidpovidalnistiu (2018). Zakon Ukrainy No. 2275-VIII. 06.02.2018. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2275-19
  20. Zadykhailo, D. V., Kibenko, O. R., Nazarova, H. V. (2003). Korporatyvne upravlinnia. Kharkiv: Espada, 687.
  21. Haivoronskyi, V. M., Zhushmana, V. P., Bilousova, Ye. M. (2005). Hospodarske pravo Ukrainy. Kharkiv: Pravo, 382.
  22. Cherepakhin, B. B. (2001). Trudy po grazhdanskomu pravu. Moscow: Statut, 477.
  23. Pro banky i bankivsku diialnist (2000). Zakon Ukrainy No. 2121-III. 07.12.2000. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2121-14
  24. Polozhennia pro osoblyvosti zabezpechennia pravonastupnytstva za ukladenymy dohovoramy strakhuvannia u razi reorhanizatsii strakhovykiv vid 04.06.2004. No. 913 (2004). Ofitsiinyi visnyk, 25, 1676.
  25. Pro sproshchennia protsedur reorhanizatsii ta kapitalizatsii bankiv (2017). Zakon Ukrainy No. 1985-VIII. 23.03.2017. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1985-19
  26. Pro vnesennia zmin do deiakykh zakonodavchykh aktiv Ukrainy shchodo osoblyvostei provedennia zakhodiv z finansovoho ozdorovlennia bankiv (2009). Zakon Ukrainy No. 1617-VI. 24.07.2009. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1617-17
  27. Metodychni rekomendatsii pro poriadok reorhanizatsii, restrukturyzatsii komertsiinykh bankiv (2000). Zatverdzheno Postanovoiu Pravlinnia NBU No. 395. 2 zhovtnia 2000 r. Zakonodavchi i normatyvni akty z bankivskoi diialnosti. 2000. No. 11 (vtratyly chynnist vid 27.06.2008 r. No. 190).
  28. Tseluiko, O. I. (2021). Mekhanizmy derzhavnoho rehuliuvannia rynkovoi kapitalizatsii bankivskoi systemy. Pravo ta derzhavne upravlinnia, 2, 184–191.
  29. Shvets, Yu. O., Vernydub, M. Yu. (2016). Problems and ways to increase bank capitalization in Ukraine. Investytsii: praktyka ta dosvid, 8, 52–57.
  30. Vasylchenko, Z. M., Domanetskyi, I. V. (2014). Kapitalizatsiia bankiv Ukrainy: suchasnyi stan ta problemy naroshchennia. Financial and Credit Activity Problems of Theory and Practice, 1 (14), 3–10.
  31. Ilchuk, P., Kots, O., Kud, A. (2020). Theoretical determining the categories “capital” and “capitalization” in the banking activity. Black Sea Economic Studies, 2 (50), 125–131. doi: https://doi.org/10.32843/bses.50-53
  32. Rod, Yu. V., Savushchyk, A. I. (2009). Zlyttia ta pohlynannia kompanii yak zasib korporatyvnoi konsolidatsii ukrainskoho biznesu. Vinyk ekonomichnoi nauky Ukrainy, 2, 122–125.
  33. Andrushchak, Ye. (2002). Reorhanizatsiia yak efektyvnyi zasib vyrishennia problemy bankrutstva pidpryiemstv. Rehionalna ekonomika, 1, 83–89.
  34. Pro zakhyst ekonomichnoi konkurentsii (2001). Zakon Ukrainy No. 2210-III. 11.01.2001. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2210-14#Text
  35. Saniakhmetova, N. A. (1998). Narusheniia zakonodatelstva o zashchite ot nedobrosovestnoi konkurentcii i sanktcii za ikh sovershenie. Biznes.
  36. Geens, K. (1997). Corporations and Partnerships in Belgium. Hague, Bruxelles, 350.
  37. Beinert, D. (2000). Corporate Acquisitions and Mergers in Germany. Kluwer Law International, 238.
  38. Commercial Code of France. With the participation of Louis VOGEL, Professor at the University of Paris II and, for the Book VI on Businesses in difficulty, of Françoise PEROCHON, Professor at the University of Montpellier I (2006). Available at: https://wipolex-res.wipo.int/edocs/lexdocs/laws/en/fr/fr199en.pdf Last accessed: 12.03.2023
  39. Companies Act 2006. Part 27 – Mergers and divisions of public companies Chapter 2. Merger, 429. Available at: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2006/46/pdfs/ukpga_20060046_en.pdf Last accessed: 18.06.2023
  40. Wild, C., Weinstein, S. (2009). Smith and Keenan’s Company law. Essex: Pearson Education Limited, 609.
  41. Shcherbakova, N. V. (2005). Sliianie i prisoedinenie khoziaistvennykh organizatcii kak samostoiatelnye formy reorganizatcii. Vіsnik Donetckogo unіversitetu. Serіia V: Ekonomіka і pravo, 1, 348–355.
  42. Pospolіtak, V., Movchan, O. (2004). Poniattia reorganіzatcіi aktcіonernikh tovaristv za ukrainskim, nіmetckim ta evropeiskim pravom. Ukrainskii pravnichii chasopis (ukrainsko-evropeiskii konsultativnii tcentr z pitan zakonodavstva), 9 (14), 56–65.
  43. New York Consolidated Laws, Business Corporation Law – BSC § 901/ Power of merger or consolidation (2021). Available at: https://codes.findlaw.com/ny/business-corporation-law/bsc-sect-901.html Last accessed: 18.06.2023
  44. Title 8. Corporations. Chapter 1. General Corporation Law. The Delaware Code Online. Available at: https://law.justia.com/codes/delaware/2021/title-8/chapter-1/
  45. Illinois Compiled Statutes. Chapter 805 – Business Organizations. Business Corporation Act of 1983. Available at: https://law.justia.com/codes/illinois/2016/chapter-805/act-805-ilcs-5/
  46. Model business corporation act (with selected Official Comments) Comments copyright a American Bar Foundation and Law and Business, Inc. reproduced with permission. Available at: https://www.systemday.com/usa-company-law/ Last accessed: 04.05.20023
  47. Model business corporation act (2016 Revision) (December 9, 2017) with official comments (2016). Available at: https://community.adobe.com/havfw69955/attachments/havfw69955/acrobat/353467/1/2016_mbca.authcheckdam.pdf
  48. U.S. Code § 368 – Definitions relating to corporate reorganizations. USA Internal Revue Code. Available at: https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/368 Last accessed: 04.05.2023
  49. Directive 2004/25/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 April 2004 on takeover bids (2004). Official Journal of the European Union. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32004L0025 Last accessed: 18.06.2023
  50. Kirichenko, O. A., Vaganova, E. V. (2009). Deiakі aspekti zlittia ta poglinannia kompanіi u svіtlі pobudovi novoi іntegratcіinoi sistemi ekonomіki. Aktualnі problemi ekonomіki, 2, 45–56.
  51. Baiura, D. O. (2005). Restrukturizatcіia pіdpriemstv. Kiiv: Kiivskii unіversitet, 209.
  52. Savietchuk, V. M. (2018). The notion and content of the categories «merger» and «acquisition» in the national and foreign legislation: comparative and legal aspect. Naukovyi visnyk Uzhhorodskoho natsionalnoho universytetu. Seriia Pravo, 1 (50), 103–106.
  53. Tipke, K., Steuerrecht, L. J. (1991). Dieter Endres & Pilny, Germany Releases Draft Regulation on the Reorganization Tax Act, Tax Notes Int’l 1867 (June 9, 1997).
  54. Vovk, S. (2013). Stratehii TNK: zlyttia i pohlynannia. Zhurnal yevropeiskoi ekonomiky, 12 (1), 28–41.
  55. Yevstaf’iev, S. M. (2019). Reorhanizatsiia instytutsiinykh odynyts shliakhom zlyttia ta pohlynannia: ekonomichna sutnist ta prychyny. Ekonomika ta upravlinnia pidpryiemstvamy, 38-1, 164–169.
  56. Smyrnova, K. V. (2015). Pravovyi poriadok konkurentsii v Yevropeiskomu Soiuzi (novitni tendentsii rozvytku). Kyiv: Kyivskyi natsionalnyi universytet im. Tarasa Shevchenka, 500.
  57. Deiaki aspekty M&A v Ukraini (2023). Pravovyi tyzhden. Available at: http://legalweekly.com.ua/index.php?id=16061&show=news&newsid=120523
  58. Pro Zahalnoderzhavnu prohramu adaptatsii zakonodavstva Ukrainy do zakonodavstva Yevropeiskoho Soiuzu. Perelik aktiv zakonodavstva Ukrainy ta acquis Yevropeiskoho Soiuzu u priorytetnykh sferakh adaptatsii (Rozdily 8-12) (2004). Zakon Ukrainy No. 1629-IV. 18.03.2004. Відомості Верховноi Ради Украiни, 29, 367.
  59. Kolomoiets, T. O., Hryshchak, S. V. (2003). Adaptatsiia informatsiinoho zakonodavstva Ukrainy do vymoh YeS yak skladova suchasnoho vitchyznianoho pravotvorchoho protsesu. Dnipropetrovsk: NHU, 164.
  60. Mamutov, V. K. (2003). Ekonomyka y pravo. Kyev: Yurynkom Ynter, 544.
  61. Zahrebelnyi, O. M. (2012). Aktualni problemy adaptatsii pravovoho rehuliuvannia zlyttia ta pohlynannia kompanii v Ukraini do prava YeS. Teoriia ta praktyka derzhavnoho upravlinnia, 3 (38), 464–469.
  62. Pro kholdynhovi kompanii v Ukraini: Zakon Ukrainy No. 3528-IV. 15.03.2006. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/3528-15#Text
  63. Stakhieieva, H. O. (2011). Pravove rehuliuvannia kontsentratsii pidpryiemstv v Yevropeiskomu Soiuzi. Kyiv, 19.
  64. Fine, T. (1989). Merger and Joint Ventures in Europe. The Law and Policy of the EEC. L., 181.
  65. Weston, J. F., Weaver, S. C. (2004). Mergers and Acquisitions. Executive MBA Series. McGraw-Hill Education, 256.
  66. Herasymenko, A. H. (2004). Polityka derzhavy shchodo zlyttia pidpryiemstv: napriamky realizatsii i vdoskonalennia. Konkurentsiia. Visnyk Antymonopolnoho komitetu Ukrainy, 4 (13), 16–21.
  67. Hamma, T. M. (2016). Osoblyvosti ta perspektyvy rozvytku rynku M&A v Ukraini. Naukovyi visnyk Mukachivskoho derzhavnoho universytetu. Seriia Ekonomika, 1 (5), 107–112.
  68. Avdosheva, S. B. (2008). Intehratsiini protsesy v promyslovosti. Zlyttia & pohlynannia, 1, 68–71.
  69. Shevchenko, L. S. (2017). Mergers and acquisitions in the legal business: economic aspect of problem. Ekonomichna teoriia ta pravo, 1 (28), 88–97.
  70. Maksymenko, I. Ya. (2018). Mergers and acquisitions as innovative development tool: current state and prospects in Ukraine. Ekonomichnyi visnyk, 2, 43–50.
  71. Sabadash, V. V., Hontar, D. A. (2015). Mergers and Acquisitions Markets: State, Problems of Functioning and Development Trends. Mekhanizm rehuliuvannia ekonomiky, 4, 127–138.
  72. Oksak, A. O. (2014). Features of the market of mergers and acquisitions in Ukraine. Teoretychni ta prykladni pytannia ekonomiky, 1, 454–462.
  73. Ivanov, Iu. V. (2001). Sliianiia, pogloshcheniia i razdelenie kompanii: strategiia i taktika transformatcii biznesa. Moscow: Alpina Pablisher, 244.
  74. Mamutov, V. K., Znamenskii, G. L., Khakhulin, V. V. et al.; Mamutov, V. K. (Ed.) (2002). Khoziaistvennoe pravo. Kyiv: Iurinkom Inter, 912.
  75. Valitov, S. S. (2005). Konkurentnoe pravo Ukrainy. Donetck: Nord-Press, 382.
  76. Smelik, V., Starosvit, S., Makarchuk, I.; Merezhko, O. (Ed.) (2006). Rehuliuvannia pravovidnosyn u sferi kontroliu za kontsentratsiiamy u zakonodavstvi Yevropeiskoho Soiuzu. Kyiv, 119.
  77. Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004 of January 2004 on the control of concentrations between undertakings (the EC Merger Regulation) (2004). Official Journal. No L 24, 1–22.
  78. European Commission. Analytical Report following the Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council, and the Council Commission Opinion on Ukraine’s application for membership of the European Union: Commission Staff working document. Brussels, 1.2.2023/SWD(2023) 30 final, 66. Available at: https://neighbourhood-enlargement.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2023-02/SWD_2023_30_Ukraine.pdf Last accessed: 08.06.2023
  79. Fefelov, O. (2023). Vidpovidnist konkurentnoho zakonodavstva Ukrainy do acquis YeS: nad chym dovedetsia pratsiuvaty? Yurydychna hazeta online. Available at: https://yur-gazeta.com/dumka-eksperta/vidpovidnist-konkurentnogo-zakonodavstva-ukrayini-acquis-es-nad-chim-dovedetsya-pracyuvati.html Last accessed: 08.06.2023
  80. Pro Antymonopolnyi komitet Ukrainy (1993). Zakonu Ukrainy No. 3659-XII. 26.10.1993. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/3659-12#Text
  81. Polozhennia pro poriadok podannia ta rozghliadu zaiav pro poperednie otrymannia dozvolu Antymonopolnoho komitetu Ukrainy na kontsentratsiiu sub’iektiv hospodariuvannia (2002). Zatverdzheno rozporiadzhenniam Antymonopolnoho komitetu Ukrainy No. 33-r. 19.02.2002. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/z0284-02#Text Last accessed: 08.06.2023

Downloads

Published

2023-06-30

How to Cite

Shcherbakova, N. (2023). Comparative legal analysis of processes of merger and accession of economic organizations in national and foreign legislation (EU, UK, USA). ScienceRise: Juridical Science, (2(24), 55–71. https://doi.org/10.15587/2523-4153.2023.283562

Issue

No. 2(24) (2023)

Section

Juridical Science

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Nataliia Shcherbakova

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Our journal abides by the Creative Commons CC BY copyright rights and permissions for open access journals.

Authors, who are published in this journal, agree to the following conditions:

1. The authors reserve the right to authorship of the work and pass the first publication right of this work to the journal under the terms of a Creative Commons CC BY, which allows others to freely distribute the published research with the obligatory reference to the authors of the original work and the first publication of the work in this journal.

 2. The authors have the right to conclude separate supplement agreements that relate to non-exclusive work distribution in the form in which it has been published by the journal (for example, to upload the work to the online storage of the journal or publish it as part of a monograph), provided that the reference to the first publication of the work in this journal is included.