Contractual forms of realization of property rights in the economic area

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/2523-4153.2024.301588

Keywords:

contractual recognition economic activity, agreement, legal relations, economic function of law

Abstract

The article is devoted to the study of a contract as a legal form of realization of property rights in the economic sphere, considering theoretical and practical problems, in particular, the problem of contract selection, and the significance of the act of acceptance and transfer of property as a legal fact. The materials used for the study include legislative acts, scientific sources on commercial and civil law, case law on transfer of ownership, conclusion of contracts on behalf of a business entity with excess of authority, and the meaning of an act of acceptance and transfer as a transaction or evidence. The study consistently reveals the relationship of legal provisions to the economic function of law, analyses the concept, features and types of commercial contracts, names contracts, under which property is transferred to the ownership or temporary use of another entity, and analyses the legal provisions on the choice of contract and the owner's performance of contractual obligations.

Based on the study, the author formulates a definition of an economic contract as a legal form of realization of property rights and identifies the characteristic features of such contracts. In particular, the author concludes that such contracts are the result of the exercise of the right to dispose of property and ensure the dynamics of property rights in the economic sphere. Based on the study of various approaches to the classification of economic contracts, the author concludes that all classifications of economic contracts include contracts for the transfer of property into ownership or use. Based on this conclusion, the author systematizes economic contracts, which mediate the realization of property rights. The author also analyzes and specifies the criteria for selecting a contract for exercising property rights in the economic sphere. The author argues that the obligation of a business entity to be the owner of property under a contract is terminated at the time of transfer of property and is mostly formalized by drawing up an act of acceptance and transfer of property. Such an act should be considered an element of the contract as a legal fact, and its legal significance lies in fixing the moment when the property owner's rights are terminated, unless another moment is established by law or contract

Author Biography

Oleksandr Pashynin, Vasyl’ Stus Donetsk National University; EVERLEGAL ATTORNEYS-AT-LAW

Lawyer

References

  1. Kalaur, I. R. (2004). Tsyvilno-pravovyi dohovir yak pidstava vynyknennia prava vlasnosti yurydychnoi osoby. [PhD theses]. Lviv.
  2. Spasybo, I. A. (2008). Nabuttia prava vlasnosti osoboiu pry yoho prypynenni v inshoi osoby: okremi problemy voli ta pravonastupnytstva. Universytetski naukovi zapysky, 4, 171–174.
  3. Hudyma, M. M. (2020). Scientific discourse on the place of transfer of property in the mechanism of contractual transfer of ownership. Aktualni Problemy Derzhavy i Prava, 86, 48–55. https://doi.org/10.32837/apdp.v0i86.2403
  4. Baron, J. B. (2014). Rescuing the Bundle-of-Rights Metaphor in Property Law. University of Cincinnati Law Review, 82 (1). Available at: https://scholarship.law.uc.edu/uclr/vol82/iss1/2
  5. Hodgson, G. M. (2015). Much of the ‘economics of property rights’ devalues property and legal rights. Journal of Institutional Economics, 11 (4), 683–709. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1744137414000630
  6. Alston, L. J., Mueller, B. (2005). Property rights and the state. Handbook of new institutional economics. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 573–590. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69305-5_23
  7. Saniakhmetova, N. O. (Red.) (2005). Hospodarske pravo Ukrainy. Kharkiv: Odissey, 608.
  8. Vinnyk, O. M. (2009). Hospodarske pravo. Kyiv: «Pravova yednist», 766.
  9. Shcherbyna, V. S. (2013). Hospodarske pravo. Kyiv: Yurinkom Inter, 640.
  10. Luts, V. V. (1999). Kontrakty u pidpryiemnytskii diialnosti. Kyiv: Yurinkom Inter, 560.
  11. Milash, V. S. (2014). Perspektyvy modernizatsiï dohovirnykh pravovidnosyn u sferi hospodariuvannia. Kharkiv: KhNUMH, 227.
  12. Voronina, N. (2010). Method and Foundations of Acquisition of Right of Ownership. Aktualni problemy derzhavy i prava, 53, 179–185.
  13. Analiz deiakykh pytan zastosuvannia sudamy zakonodavstva pro pravo vlasnosti pry rozghliadi tsyvilnykh sprav (2013). Lyst Verkhovnoho Sudu Ukrainy vid 01 lypnia 2013 r. Platforma LIGA 360. Available at: https://ips.ligazakon.net/document/VSS00069
  14. Dluhosh, O. I. (2013). Nediisnist pravochyniv z defektamy voli. [PhD theses]. Kyiv.
  15. Postanova Verkhovnoho Sudu u skladi kolehii suddiv Kasatsiinoho hospodarskoho sudu u skladi Verkhovnoho Sudu vid 02 travnia 2018 roku u spravi No. 923/20/17 (2018). Available at: http://www.reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/74160438
  16. Postanova Velykoi Palaty Verkhovnoho Sudu vid 08 zhovtnia 2019 r. po spravi No. 916/2084/17 (2019). Available at: https://lpd.court.gov.ua/adjudication/174
  17. Postanova Velykoi Palaty Verkhovnoho Sudu vid 16 travnia 2018 r. po spravi No. 127/14633/16-ts (2018). Available at: https://lpd.court.gov.ua/adjudication/376
  18. Ukhvala Velykoi Palaty Verkhovnoho Sudu vid 11 serpnia 2022 r. po spravi No. 916/2084/17 (2022). Available at: http://iplex.com.ua/doc.php?regnum=105852865&red=10000387e4b3ed006f531be201c3c400e43af1&d=5

Published

2024-03-31

How to Cite

Pashynin, O. (2024). Contractual forms of realization of property rights in the economic area. ScienceRise: Juridical Science, (1(27), 26–33. https://doi.org/10.15587/2523-4153.2024.301588

Issue

Section

Juridical Science