Research of actual and priority directions in the field of legal technique
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15587/2523-4153.2017.111167Keywords:
legal technology, legal tactics, legal monitoring, the effectiveness of law, law-makingAbstract
Legal technique contributes not only to the autonomy of specific legal branches, but also their integration, which is determined by the needs of developing the basic concepts of theoretical jurisprudence.
The analysis of the results of scientific work of modern Ukrainian lawyers gives grounds to focus on four main types of legal technology and technology, namely: law-making, legal-system, legal and law-enforcement.
The toolkit of legal technique is applied in all branches of law. With the help of techniques and means of legal technology, the degree of economy and the system of law increases. This is due to the complication of social life and the intensification of the specialization of the law. As a result, there is a clear distinction between sectoral norms.
Given the priority of scientific research in the field of legal technology, the task of the scientific community is actualized – to identify possible ways of using legal means, to develop recommendations for their optimization and regulatory consolidation. All developments will be credited to the treasury of legal and technical knowledge, the content and scope of which for each representative of the legal profession will serve as a benchmark for the implementation of the most common and personalized legal tasks.
On the subject of legal regulation are the rules of constitutional law, administrative, criminal, civil and many other fields of law. They share the qualitative homogeneity of regulated public relations. Taken together, the standards form the content of the corresponding fields of law. On this basis all the rules of law are also divided into: material (confirm the status of the parties involved and contain a specific rule of conduct in this particular situation); procedural (containing detailed instructions on the procedure for the practical implementation of the substantive law); conflict rule (taken with the aim of eliminating contradictions (collisions, collisions) between certain legal regulations, which determine the order of application of those or other norms).
The study of legal techniques and legal rules of technology should be carried out through a combination of theoretical generalizations and industry practice. The implementation of the existing doctrinal material on the legal techniques and technology to knowledge and skills of students, and through them later in the legal realities of the Ukrainian state, should be achieved by the introduction in the last years of law schools of Ukraine normative discipline, "Legal technique and legal technology" and related courses in various specialization.
It should be noted that the priority directions of the study include the problems of legal technology in all branches of law. In particular, it is possible to distinguish such issues as: problems of legal technology in the study of issues related to restrictions and prohibitions in civil law; law making mistakes of local self-government bodies; legal technique of fixing the method of committing a crime; the question of the optimal location of criminal-law material; administrative law-enforcement technique; the specifics of teaching methods of technical and legal peculiarities of legislation in the field of operative-search activity in higher educational institutions of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Ukraine; the concept of legal technology in international law; legal technique of anti-corruption legislation; legal terminology (language) of law-enforcement acts of criminal-law content; a systematic approach to the use of opportunities of modern information technologies for the development of legal technology in the advertising sphere; methodological prerequisites for the formation of the theory of legal presumptions; specification of Ukrainian legislation on control over concentrations of business entities; problems of legal regulation of the institute of consumer co-operation and the importance of legislative technique in their solution; technical and legal defects in the legislative regulation of relations with the provision of personnel services as a factor inhibiting the development of the economy and destabilizing the legal field; technical and legal problems of argumentation in law and many others
References
- Kashanina, T. V. (2011). Yuridicheskaya tekhnika. Moscow: Norma: INFRA-M, 496.
- Shutak, I. D., Onyshchuk, I. I. (2013). Yurydychna tekhnika. Ivano-Frankivsk, 496.
- Antolohiia konstytutsiinoho protsesu v suchasnii Ukraini (2017). Kyiv: Zapovit, 781.
- Shutak, I. D. (2014). Yurydychna tekhnika: teoriia pravovykh zasterezhen. Ivano-Frankivsk: Laboratoriia akademichnykh doslidzhen pravovoho rehuliuvannia ta yurydychnoi tekhniky, 260.
- Onyshchuk, I. I.; Shutak, I. D. (Ed.) (2016). Tekhniko-tekhnolohichni aspekty pravovoho monitorynhu yakosti normatyvno-pravovykh aktiv. Yurydychna tekhnika i tekhnolohiia: teoriia ta praktyka zastosuvannia. Kharkiv: Pravo, 110–116.
- Zaichuka, O. V., Onishchenko, N. M. (2008). Teoriia derzhavy i prava. Akademichnyi kurs. Kyiv: Yurinkom Inter, 688.
- Kosovych, V. M.; Shutak, I. D. (Ed.) (2016). Yurydychna tekhnika: problemy perekhodu vid teorii do praktyky. Yurydychna tekhnika i tekhnolohiia: teoriia ta praktyka zastosuvannia. Kharkiv: Pravo, 31–34.
- Otradnova, O. O.; Shutak, I. D. (Ed.) (2016). Vady yurydychnoi tekhniky pobudovy hlavy 82 Tsyvilnoho kodeksu Ukrainy. Yurydychna tekhnika i tekhnolohiia: teoriia ta praktyka zastosuvannia. Kharkiv: Pravo, 8–11.
- Shutak, I. D., Onyshchuk, I. I.; Petryshyn, O. V. (Ed.) (2013). Yurydychna tekhnika: pytannia doktryny. Rozdil 3. Pravodoktrynalni kontseptsii suchasnoi ukrainskoi derzhavnosti. Pravova doktryna Ukrainy. T. 1. Zahalnoteoretychna ta istorychna yurysprudentsiia. Kharkiv, 638–691.
- Bobrovnyk, S. V.; Shutak, I. D. (Ed.) (2016). Pravopiznannia yak zasib podolannia yurydychnykh kolizii. Yurydychna tekhnika i tekhnolohiia: teoriia ta praktyka zastosuvannia. Kharkiv: Pravo, 19–22.
- Kelman, M. S., Tokarska, A. S.; Shutak, I. D. (Ed.) (2016). Osmyslennia metodolohichnoi bazy ta osnovnykh metodiv otsinky normatyvno-pravovykh aktiv na koruptsiohennist. Yurydychna tekhnika i tekhnolohiia: teoriia ta praktyka zastosuvannia. Kharkiv: Pravo, 84–87.
- Kaplina, O. V.; Shutak, I. D. (Ed.) (2016). Defekty kryminalnoho protsesualnoho zakonodavstva ta yikh nehatyvnyi vplyv na pravozastosovnu praktyku. Yurydychna tekhnika i tekhnolohiia: teoriia ta praktyka zastosuvannia. Kharkiv: Pravo, 11–15.
- Hutorova, N. O.; Shutak, I. D. (Ed.) (2016). Monitorynh sotsialnykh rezultativ kryminalno-pravovoho rehuliuvannia: stan, problemy i perspektyvy rozvytku. Yurydychna tekhnika i tekhnolohiia: teoriia ta praktyka zastosuvannia. Kharkiv: Pravo, 142–144.
- Onyshchuk, I. I. (2011). Problemy vdoskonalennia normatyvno-pravovoho rehuliuvannia vymoh do yurydychnoi tekhniky. Yurydychna Ukraina, 6 (102), 22–27.
- Shutak, I. D.; Shutak, I. D. (Ed.) (2016). Yurydychna tekhnika i tekhnolohiia: teoriia ta praktyka zastosuvannia. Yurydychna tekhnika i tekhnolohiia: teoriia ta praktyka zastosuvannia. Kharkiv: Pravo, 4–8.
- Rabinovych, P. M.; Shutak, I. D. (Ed.) (2016). Yurydychna tekhnika – skladova tekhniky yurydychnoi diialnosti. Yurydychna tekhnika i tekhnolohiia: teoriia ta praktyka zastosuvannia. Kharkiv: Pravo, 3–4.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2017 Ilya Shutak
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Our journal abides by the Creative Commons CC BY copyright rights and permissions for open access journals.
Authors, who are published in this journal, agree to the following conditions:
1. The authors reserve the right to authorship of the work and pass the first publication right of this work to the journal under the terms of a Creative Commons CC BY, which allows others to freely distribute the published research with the obligatory reference to the authors of the original work and the first publication of the work in this journal.
2. The authors have the right to conclude separate supplement agreements that relate to non-exclusive work distribution in the form in which it has been published by the journal (for example, to upload the work to the online storage of the journal or publish it as part of a monograph), provided that the reference to the first publication of the work in this journal is included.