Legal entities of public law as participants in civil relations

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/2523-4153.2020.216677

Keywords:

legal entity of public law, legal regime of property, liability, subjects of public law

Abstract

The article examines the issues of the legal status of legal entities of public law. At the basis of the division of legal entities into legal entities of private and legal entities of public law, the criterion of the method of creating a legal entity is applied. At the same time, one criterion is not enough to distinguish between these types of legal entities, we propose to supplement this criterion with criteria for the purpose of activity and the degree of dependence of a legal entity of public law on a subject of public law. The article considers the characteristics of a legal entity of public law, which can be classified into general and special. The general ones include: organizational unity, the presence of separate property, acting in circulation on its own behalf, civil liability; special features include: creation in an administrative order; satisfaction of the state interest; do not own a property. The article analyzes the issues of responsibility and legal regime of property of legal entities of public law. Today, the search continues for an effective model of property law regarding the legal regime of legal entities of public law. As a replacement for limited property rights, such as the right of economic management and the right of operational management, a property management agreement is proposed. The issues of correlation of the concepts "subject of public law" and "legal entity of public law" are investigated. These concepts should not be identified, since the concept of a legal entity of public law is broader in scope than the concept of public law formation

Author Biography

Victoriia Piddubna, Yaroslav Mudryi National Law University Pushkinska str., 77, Kharkiv, Ukraine, 61024

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Civil Law No. 2

References

  1. Chirkin, V. E. (2007). Iuridicheskoe litso publichnogo prava. Moscow: Norma, 352.
  2. Tarasov, O. I. (2013). Iuridicheskie litsa publichnogo prava: administrativno-pravovoi aspekt. Saint Petersburg, 15.
  3. Iastrebov, O. A. (2014). Iuridicheskoe litso publichnogo prava: sravnitelno-pravovoe issledovanie. Moscow, 49.
  4. Zubar, V. M. (2016). Kryterii podilu yurydychnykh osib na osib publichnoho ta pryvatnoho prava. Yurydychni osoby publichnoho prava: uchast u tsyvilnomu oboroti (Matveievski tsyvilistychni chytannia). Kyiv: Tov: «Bilotserkovdruk», 186.
  5. Maidanik, R. A.; Maidanik, R. A. (Ed.) (2010). Iuridicheskie litsa publichnogo prava v ukrainskom i mezhdunarodnom prave. Almanakh tsivilistiki. No. 3. Kyiv: Alerta – Tsentr uchebnoi literatury, 332.
  6. Sukhanov, E. O. O iuridicheskikh litsakh publichnogo prava. Available at: https://justicemaker.ru/view-article.php?id=4&art=2494
  7. Bazarov, V. B.; Kuras, L. V. (Ed.) (2019). Publichnye iuridicheskie litsa. Irkutsk: Izd-vo «Ottisk», 160.
  8. Kucherenko, I. M. (2004). Orhanizatsiino-pravovi formy yurydychnykh osib pryvatnoho prava. Kyiv: IDiP, DP «Yurydychne vydavnytstvo «Asta», 328.
  9. Kulagin, M. I. (2004). Izbrannye trudy po aktsionernomu i torgovomu pravu. Moscow: Statut, 363.
  10. Volkova, L. O. (2019). Tsyvilno-pravovyi status derzhavnykh aktsionernykh kompanii. Kyiv, 21.
  11. Spasybo-Fateievoi, I. V. (Ed.) (2011). Tsyvilnyi Kodeks Ukrainy: Naukovo-praktychnyi komentar (poiasnennia, tlumachennia, rekomendatsii z vykorystanniam pozytsii vyshchykh sudovykh instantsii, Ministerstva yustytsii, naukovtsiv, fakhivtsiv). Vol. 5: Pravo vlasnosti ta inshi rechovi prava. Seriia «Komentari ta analityka». Kharkiv: FOP Lysiak L. S., 547–549.
  12. Dovhert, A. S. (2016). Deiaki zauvazhennia shchodo formuvannia systemy yurydychnykh osib v Ukraini. Yurydychni osoby publichnoho prava: uchast u tsyvilnomu oboroti (Matvieievski tsyvilistychni chytannia). Kyiv: Tov «Bilotserkovdruk», 186.
  13. Borysova, V. I. (2005). Publichni utvorennia yak uchasnyky tsyvilnykh vidnosyn. Derzhavne budivnytstvo ta mistseve samovriaduvannia. Kharkiv: Pravo, 10.
  14. Romanovskaia, O. V., Bezrukova, O. V. (2015). Sravnitelno-pravovoi status iuridicheskikh lits publichnogo prava. Nauka. Obschestvo. Gosudarstvo, 3 (1 (9)). Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/sravnitelno-pravovoy-status-yuridicheskih-lits-publichnogo-prava-na-primere-rossii-i-gruzii
  15. Grazhdanskii kodeks Azerbaidzhanskoi respubliki ot 28 dekabria 1999 goda (1999). Available at: http://base.spinform.ru/show_doc.fwx?rgn=2577
  16. Acosta, R. M. (1975). Teoria general del Derecho Administrativo. Mexico: UNAM, 33.
  17. Ovedo, G., Useros, C. y M. Enrigue Derecho Administrativo. Madrid: I.E.I.S.A. 1968. P. 196
  18. Zernov, I. V. (2017). O sootnoshenii poniatii «publichno-pravovoe obrazovanie» i «iuridicheskoe litso publichnogo prava». Nauka. Obschestvo. Gosudarstvo, 5 (4 (20)). Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/o-sootnoshenii-ponyatiy-publichno-pravovoe-obrazovanie-i-yuridicheskoe-litso-publichnogo-prava/viewer
  19. Dzera, Yu. M. (2011). Derzhava yak uchasnyk tsyvilnykh pravovidnosyn. Kyiv, 20.

Downloads

Published

2020-12-25

How to Cite

Piddubna, V. (2020). Legal entities of public law as participants in civil relations. ScienceRise: Juridical Science, (4(14), 29–33. https://doi.org/10.15587/2523-4153.2020.216677

Issue

No. 4(14) (2020)

Section

Juridical Science

License

Copyright (c) 2020 Victoriia Piddubna

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Our journal abides by the Creative Commons CC BY copyright rights and permissions for open access journals.

Authors, who are published in this journal, agree to the following conditions:

1. The authors reserve the right to authorship of the work and pass the first publication right of this work to the journal under the terms of a Creative Commons CC BY, which allows others to freely distribute the published research with the obligatory reference to the authors of the original work and the first publication of the work in this journal.

 2. The authors have the right to conclude separate supplement agreements that relate to non-exclusive work distribution in the form in which it has been published by the journal (for example, to upload the work to the online storage of the journal or publish it as part of a monograph), provided that the reference to the first publication of the work in this journal is included.