Differetiation of extradition procedures in criminal proceedings of Ukraine

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/2523-4153.2020.220586

Keywords:

international cooperation, legal assistance, extradition of persons, European arrest warrant, provisional arrest, extradition arrest, detention, authorized agency, simplified extradition, extradition check

Abstract

The article is devoted to the differentiation of the procedures for extradition of a person, depending on the procedure for implementation, into ordinary and simplified ones, as well as the study of the procedural mechanism for extradition of a person in a simplified manner, taking into account legislative changes, related to ratification of the Third Additional Protocol and the Fourth Additional Protocol to the European the convention on extradition of offenders. The procedural features of the simplified extradition procedure are associated with a specific mechanism for its implementation, in which certain subjects of criminal proceedings are involved, exercising the rights and obligations, provided by law: the authorized (central) body of Ukraine, the competent authorities of Ukraine (the prosecutor), as well as the investigating judge, the head of the institution of preliminary detention , defender, if necessary – translator. In the investigated order of extradition, the following are special: conditions and grounds for application, subject composition, terms, procedural acts, restrictions on appeal. Simplified extradition can be applied only with the written consent of the requested person, approved by the investigating judge, before the decision on extradition is made by the authorized (central) body of Ukraine upon request. Simplification of extradition proceedings is aimed at accelerating the latter, saving procedural time and money, as well as reducing the time frame for the application of measures of criminal procedural coercion. The legality of actions, decisions when deciding on the application of measures of criminal procedural coercion (detention, temporary, extradition arrest, the use of preventive measures not related to detention), as well as the voluntariness of consent to simplify the procedure and understanding of the consequences of this is ensured by the investigating judge by implementing judicial control. Facilitation of extradition contributes to the international fight against crime, but must be carried out with respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms and the inadmissibility of violations and lawlessness

Author Biography

Anastasiia Pidgorodynska, National University “Odesa Law Academy” Fontanska road, 23, Odesa, Ukraine, 65009

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Criminal Proceedings, Detective and Operational Activites

References

  1. Antoniuk, A. B. (2016). Sproshchenyi poriadok vydachi (ekstradytsii) osoby zapytuiuchii storoni. Mizhnarodnyi yurydychnyi visnyk: zbirnyk naukovykh prats Natsionalnoho universytetu derzhavnoi podatkovoi sluzhby Ukrainy, 1, 91–95. Available at: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/muvnudp_2016_1_17
  2. Akhtyrska, N. M. (2014). Sudovyi kontrol za ekstradytsiinym protsesom: pidstavy dlia tymchasovoho ta ekstradytsiinoho areshtiv. Biuleten Ministerstva yustytsii Ukrainy, 10, 139–145.
  3. Berezniak V. S. Ekstradytsiia yak instytut kryminalno-protsesualnoho prava Ukrainy. Dnipropetrovsk, 20. Available at: http://dspace.nlu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/17798?locale=uk
  4. Zuiev, V. V. (2017). Kryminalni protsesualni harantii prav osoby pry mizhnarodnomu spivrobitnytstvi pid chas kryminalnoho provadzhennia. Kharkiv: «Oberih», 204.
  5. Boiko, I. I. (2019). Zastosuvannia kryminalno-protsesualnoho prymusu v ekstradytsiinomu protsesi. Odesa, 20. Available at: http://dspace.onua.edu.ua/bitstream/handle/11300/11997/%D0%91%D0%BE%D0%B9%D0%BA%D0%BE%20%D0%86.%D0%86..pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
  6. Bortnytska, V. V. (2019). Meta ta pryntsypy sproshchenoho poriadku vydachi osib. Aktualni problemy vitchyznianoi yurysprudentsii, 2, 89–93.
  7. Vykhryst, S. M. (2002). Vydacha osib v aspekti spivvidnoshennia mizhnarodnoho ta natsionalnoho prava. Kharkiv, 163.
  8. Galenskaia, L. N. (1972). Mezhdunarodnaia borba s prestupnostiu. Moscow: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniia, 167.
  9. Maksymiv, L. V. (2013). Perevirka obstavyn, shcho mozhut pereshkodzhaty vydachi osoby (ekstradytsiina perevirka): deiaki aspekty. Naukovyi visnyk Lvivskoho derzhavnoho universytetu vnutrishnikh sprav, 4, 367–376.
  10. Pidhorodynska, A. V. (2013). Vykorystannia rishen inozemnykh sudiv ta mizhnarodnykh sudovykh orhaniv u kryminalnomu protsesi Ukrainy. Odesa: Yurydychna literatura, 184.
  11. Rodionov, K. S. (1990). Interpol: vchera, segodnia, zavtra. Moscow: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniia, 224.
  12. Tatarov, O. Yu. (2019). Harantii shchodo imunitetu pry ekstradytsii maiut dotrymuvatysia bezapeliatsiino. Zakon i Biznes. Available at: https://zib.com.ua/ua/136253-keruyuchiy_partner_ao_tfg_oleg_tatarov_garantii_schodo_imuni.html
  13. Udalova, L. D., Motyl, V. I., Humin, O. M. (2012). Prokurorskyi nahliad za ekstradytsiieiu osoby. Kyiv: Skif, 144.
  14. Chornous, Yu. M. (2015). Vydacha osoby (ekstradytsiia) u kryminalnomu provadzhenni shchodo zlochyniv mizhnarodnoho kharakteru. Visnyk kryminalnoho sudochynstva, 1, 143–150.
  15. Kryminalnyi protsesualnyi kodeks Ukrainy (2012). Verkhovna Rada Ukrainy No. 4651-VI. 13.04.2012. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/4651-17
  16. Boiko, I. I. (2017). Ekstradytsiine provadzhennia: poniattia ta protsesualnyi poriadok. Visnyk kryminalnoho sudochynstva, 2, 157–164.
  17. Henprokuror pro mizhnarodno-pravove spivrobitnytstvo ta rishennia Ofisu prokurora shchodo Mizhnarodnoho kryminalnoho sudu. Available at: https://www.gp.gov.ua/ua/news?_m=publications&_c=view&_t=rec&id=285690
  18. Ramochnoe reshenie No. 2002/584/PVD Soveta ES o evropeiskom ordere na arest i protsedurakh peredachi lits mezhdu gosudarstvami-chlenami ot 13.06.2002 g. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/994_b17
  19. Pro vnesennia zmin do Kryminalnoho protsesualnoho kodeksu Ukrainy u zviazku iz ratyfikatsiieiu Tretoho dodatkovoho protokolu ta Chetvertoho dodatkovoho protokolu do Yevropeiskoi konventsii pro vydachu pravoporushnykiv (2018). Zakon Ukrainy No. 2577-VIII. 02.10.2018. Available at: http://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2577-19
  20. Pidhorodynska, A. V. (2020). Zastosuvannia vydachi osoby (ekstradytsii) u sproshchenomu poriadku za kryminalnym protsesualnym zakonodavstvom Ukrainy. Odesa: Vydavnychyi dim «Helvetyka», 260–263.
  21. Ukhvala Boryspilskoho miskraionnoho sudu Kyivskoi oblasti vid 28.01.2019 r. (prov. No. 1-ks/359/255/2019). Available at: https://youcontrol.com.ua/ru/catalog/court-document/79557303/
  22. Ukhvala slidchoho suddi Hlukhivskoho miskraionnoho sudu u spravi No. 576/147/20. Available at: http://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/87148684
  23. Fridman-Kozachenko, M. M., Bychok, T. P. (2020). Current issues of extradition implementation in Ukraine. Juridical Scientific and Electronic Journal, 3, 420–423. doi: http://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0374/2020-3/102
  24. Rishennia YeSPL vid 10.12.2009 r. u spravi «Koktysh proty Ukrainy» (zaiava No. 43707/07). Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/974_872#Text

Downloads

Published

2020-12-25

How to Cite

Pidgorodynska, A. (2020). Differetiation of extradition procedures in criminal proceedings of Ukraine. ScienceRise: Juridical Science, (4(14), 53–59. https://doi.org/10.15587/2523-4153.2020.220586

Issue

No. 4(14) (2020)

Section

Juridical Science

License

Copyright (c) 2020 Anastasiia Pidgorodynska

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Our journal abides by the Creative Commons CC BY copyright rights and permissions for open access journals.

Authors, who are published in this journal, agree to the following conditions:

1. The authors reserve the right to authorship of the work and pass the first publication right of this work to the journal under the terms of a Creative Commons CC BY, which allows others to freely distribute the published research with the obligatory reference to the authors of the original work and the first publication of the work in this journal.

 2. The authors have the right to conclude separate supplement agreements that relate to non-exclusive work distribution in the form in which it has been published by the journal (for example, to upload the work to the online storage of the journal or publish it as part of a monograph), provided that the reference to the first publication of the work in this journal is included.