Concept and peculiarities of the primus in the labor law of Ukraine, whether in connection with legal responsibility

Authors

  • Dmyto Pryputen Dnipropetrovsk State University of Internal Affairs Gagarina ave., 26, Dnipro, Ukraine, 49005, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/2523-4153.2018.135821

Keywords:

administrative and preventive measures, administrative coercion, prevention, restriction, service law, preventive character, coercion, termination, public service

Abstract

The article covers the scientific approaches to understanding categories as "coercion", "state coercion", "administrative coercion". The signs of coercion in the official law of Ukraine, which is not related to legal liability, are disclosed. Emphasizing the specifics of coercion in the official law of Ukraine, not related to legal liability). Proposed under compulsion in the law of law, not related to legal liability, it is necessary to understand the application of the measures provided for by the administrative and legal norms of the measures of influence on the law-abiding subjects who are exposed to their negative consequences of moral, personal, property, organizational or other character with the aim prevention or termination of unlawful actions, overcoming their harmful consequences.

Measures of administrative coercion, not related to legal liability, constitute their own administrative and preventive measures as a set of measures of official influence of state bodies, and in cases of delegation of relevant powers and public associations to individuals, legal entities, regardless of the will and desire of the latter , in the form of moral, personal, property, organizational restrictions of their rights, freedoms, legitimate interests in order to prevent the commission of unlawful acts by any and certain persons, zab BAKING enforcement under any circumstances.

The purpose of administrative and preventive measures, which is complex and in fact combines two elements: general preventive and specially preventive (general and special preventive measures). Measures of administrative coercion of a preventive nature are used to prevent the commission of offenses on the part of concrete persons and to prevent certain types of offenses. This circumstance allows the conditional division of the actual preventive measures of administrative coercion into two subgroups: measures special (detailed, with a clearly defined specialpreventive purpose) and general (with a general purpose purpose) character

Author Biography

Dmyto Pryputen, Dnipropetrovsk State University of Internal Affairs Gagarina ave., 26, Dnipro, Ukraine, 49005

PhDDepartment of general law disciplines

References

  1. Kolpakov, V. K. (1999). Administratyvne pravo Ukrainy. Kyiv: Yurinkom Inter, 736.
  2. Melnyk, R. S. (2002). Zabezpechennia zakonnosti zastosuvannia zakhodiv administratyvnoho prymusu, ne poviazanykh z vidpovidalnistiu. Kharkiv, 211.
  3. Bytiak, Yu. P., Zui, V. V., Komziuk, A. T. (1994). Perekonannia i prymus u derzhavnomu upravlinni. Administratyvna vidpovidalnist: konspekt lektsiy. Kharkiv: Ukr. Yuryd. Akademiia, 34.
  4. Klyushnichenko, A. P. (1979). Mery administrativnogo prinuzhdeniya, primenyaemye miliciey (Osobennosti. Klassifikaciya. Sistemovyrazhenie). Kyiv: KVSH MVD SSSR, 87.
  5. Bytiak, Yu. P., Bohutskyi, V. V., Harashchuk, V. M. et. al. (2000). Administratyvne pravo Ukrainy. Kharkiv: Pravo, 520.
  6. Ryabov, Yu. S. (1974). Administrativno-predupreditel'nye mery: Teoreticheskie voprosy. Perm': Kn. Izd-vo, 82.
  7. Bezsmertnyi, E. O. (1997). Administratyvno-zapobizhni zakhody, shcho zastosovuiutsia orhanamy vnutrishnikh sprav. Kharkiv: Un-t vnutr. sprav, 155.
  8. Bezsmertnyi, E. O. (1997). Administratyvno-zapobizhni zakhody, shcho zastosovuiutsia orhanamy vnutrishnikh sprav. Kharkiv: Un-t vnutr. sprav, 155.
  9. Komziuk, A. T. (1999). Pidstavy zastosuvannia zakhodiv administratyvnoho prymusu. Problemy borotby z koruptsieiu, orhanizovanoiu zlochynnistiu ta kontrabandoiu, 18, 492–496.
  10. Prohorov, A. M. (Ed.) (1989). Sovetskiy enciklopedicheskiy slovar'. Moscow: Sov. Enciklopediya, 1632.
  11. Komziuk, A. T. (1999). Problemy reformuvannia zakonodavstva, shcho rehuliuie administratyvnyi prymus. Problemy naukovoho zabezpechennia administratyvnoi reformy v Ukraini, 2, 316–321.
  12. Alekhin, A. P., Karmolickiy, A. A., Kozlov, Yu. M. (1996). Administrativnoe pravo Rossiyskoy Federacii. Moscow: ZERCALO, TEIS, 640.
  13. Bahrah, D. N. (1996). Administrativnoe pravo. Moscow: BEK, 368.
  14. Eropkin, M. I. (1963). O klassifikacii mer administrativnogo prinuzhdeniya. Voprosy sovetskogo administrativnogo prava na sovremennom etape. Moscow: Gosyurizdat, 60–68.
  15. Kodeks Ukrainy pro administratyvni pravoporushennia (1984). Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady URSR, dodatok do No. 51. St. 1122 (z nastupnymy zminamy ta dopovnenniamy).
  16. Mytnyi kodeks Ukrainy vid 13 bereznia 2012 r (2012). Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy (VVR), No. 44-45, No. 46-47, No. 48, St. 552.
  17. Pro natsionalnu politsiu vid 2 lypnia 2015 r. (2015). Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady (VVR), No. 40-41, St. 379.
  18. Pro Sluzhbu bezpeky Ukrainy: Zakon Ukrainy vid 25 bereznia 1992 r. (1992). Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy, No. 27, St. 382.
  19. Igitov, V. I. (1965). Administrativno-pravovye i obshchestvennye mery vozdeystviya v oblasti ohrany obshchestvennogo poryadk. Moscow, 16.
  20. Eropkin, M. I., Popov, L. L. (1973). Administrativno-pravovaya ohrana obshchestvennogo poryadka. Leningrad: Lenizdat, 328.
  21. Petrov, G. I. (1960). Sovetskoe administrativnoe pravo. Leningrad, 420.
  22. Bahrah, D. N. (1989). Administrativno-processual'noe prinuzhdenie. Izv. vuzov. Pravovedenie, 4, 59–64.
  23. Rozin, L. M. (1982). Problemy klassifikacii mer administrativnogo prinuzhdeniya. Upravlenie i pravo, 7, 182–186.
  24. Bytiak, Yu. P., Zui, V. V. (1996). Administratyvne pravo Ukrainy: konspekt lektsiy. Kharkiv: NIuAU im. Ya. Mudroho, 160.
  25. Bandurka, O. M. (1999). Osnovy upravlinnia v orhanakh vnutrishnikh sprav Ukrainy: teoriya, dosvid, shliakhy udoskonalennia. Kharkiv: “Osnova”, 440.
  26. Melnyk, R. S. (2000). Administratyvni stiahnennia v systemi zakhodiv administratyvnoho prymusu. Problemy pravoznavstva ta pravookhoronnoi diyalnosti, 3, 187–192.
  27. Salmanova, O. Yu. (2002). Administratyvno-pravovi zasoby zabezpechennia militsiieiu bezpeky dorozhnoho rukhu. Kharkiv, 19.
  28. Popov, L. L. (2002). Administrativnoe pravo. Moscow: Yurist, 697.
  29. Hladun, Z. S. (2004). Administratyvne pravo Ukrainy. Ternopil: Kart-blansh, 579.
  30. Bityak, Yu. P., Boguckiy, V. V., Garashchuk, V. N. (2003). Administrativnoe pravo Ukrainy. Kharkiv: Pravo, 576.
  31. Mal'ko, A. V. (2003). Stimuly i ogranicheniya v prave. Moscow: Yurist, 250.
  32. Bandurka, O. M. (Ed.) (2000). Administratyvna diyalnist. Chastyna osoblyva. Kharkiv: Vyd-vo Un-tu vnutr. sprav, “ESPADA”, 368.
  33. Nehodchenko, O. V. (2003). Zabezpechennia prav i svobod liudyny orhanamy vnutrishnikh sprav: orhanizatsiyno-pravovi zasady. Kharkiv, 477.

Downloads

Published

2018-06-29

How to Cite

Pryputen, D. (2018). Concept and peculiarities of the primus in the labor law of Ukraine, whether in connection with legal responsibility. ScienceRise: Juridical Science, (2 (4), 36–41. https://doi.org/10.15587/2523-4153.2018.135821

Issue

No. 2 (4) (2018)

Section

Juridical Science

License

Copyright (c) 2018 Dmyto Pryputen

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Our journal abides by the Creative Commons CC BY copyright rights and permissions for open access journals.

Authors, who are published in this journal, agree to the following conditions:

1. The authors reserve the right to authorship of the work and pass the first publication right of this work to the journal under the terms of a Creative Commons CC BY, which allows others to freely distribute the published research with the obligatory reference to the authors of the original work and the first publication of the work in this journal.

 2. The authors have the right to conclude separate supplement agreements that relate to non-exclusive work distribution in the form in which it has been published by the journal (for example, to upload the work to the online storage of the journal or publish it as part of a monograph), provided that the reference to the first publication of the work in this journal is included.