The cross-border meso-level of cluster forms development of industrial integration
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33987/vsed.2-3(63-64).2017.37-49Keywords:
cross-border cluster system, meso-level, meso-economic synthesis, European integration, European region, innovations, competitivenessAbstract
The article examines the main features inherent to meso-level of international integration formations representing network structures in intra-branch and inter-branch cooperation in the form of cross-border cluster systems encompassing macro-level and micro-level of integration of national economies. Possibilities of theory synthesis of international economic integration and cluster concept in economic area virtualization environment are revealed. Cluster approach is proved to be the most efficient mechanism to develop cross-border economic relations and represents, finally, a meso-level of competitive international integration systems and mandatory condition of quality advance for Ukrainian European integration. The essence and inner interrelations of cross-border network cluster are investigated as the growth factor of the European region competitiveness under the conditions of intensifying the integration processes and the necessity of enhancement of the role of periphery regions’ economy in the framework of cross-border cooperation. Within the context of European Union regional politics the strategic priorities of the spatial development of the European regions are stated on the basis of self-organization of “hybrid” network quasi integration institutions. Their role in the competitive recovery of the European regions in the light of Ukrainian perspectives of joining European Union is investigated.
References
Declaration concerning regionalism in Europe (1996). Assembly of European Regions, Secretariat General Immeuble Europe, Strasbourg, 10 p.
Cluster policy in Europe (2008). A brief summary of cluster policies in 31 European countries, Europe Innovation Cluster Mapping Project, Oxford Research AS, 34 р.
Williamson, O. (1985). The economic institutions of capitalism, Free Press, New York, 450 p.
Coase, R. G. (1994). Nature of the firm, Lessons business organization, Lenizdat, St. Petersburg, p. 29 [in Russian]
Marshall, A. (1928). Elements of economics of industry being the first volume of elements of economics, London, 460 p.
Porter, M. E. (1998). Clusters and competition: new agendas for companies, govern¬ments, and institutions, Harvard Business School Working Paper, Boston, MA, No. 98-080.
Porter, M. E. (1990). The competitiveness advantage of nations, Macmillan, London.
Armstrong, H. W. (1995). The role and evolution of European Community Regional Policy. B. Jones, M. Keating (Eds.). The European Union and the Regions, Clarindon press, Oxford, pp. 23–62.
Rekord, S. I. (2012). Methodology of the cluster systems development as a mesolevel of international economic integration [Metodologiya razvitiya klasternykh sistem kak mezourovnya mezhdunarodnoy ekonomicheskoy integratsii], Izd-vo SPbGUEF, Sankt-Peterburg, 211 s. [in Russian]
Rekord, S. I. (2010). The industrial-innovative clusters development in Europe: evolution and contemporary discussion [Razvitie promyshlenno-innovacionnyh klasterov v Evrope: evolyuciya i sovremennaya diskussiya], Izd-vo SPbGUEF, Sankt-Peterburg, 109 s. [in Russian]
Anderson, N. V. (2007). Ukraine-EU trans-border cooperation: developing Euroregions on the border (the case study of lower danube). In: Democracy vs. Authoritarianism, Abstracts, Warsaw East European Conference, Warsaw, pp. 11–12.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2017 Socio-Economic Research Bulletin
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.