DOI: https://doi.org/10.24028/gzh.0203-3100.v37i4.2015.111129

Formation of three-dimensional image of the medium by the sum of CDP for the studies of geological structure of mine fields

V. Pilipenko, A. Verpahovskaya, V. Budkevich, E. Pilipenko

Abstract


Traditionally, seismic observations are carried out by the reflected wave method with multiple overlaps. Thus, the primary result of the processing of such data is the sum of CDP. For further imaging there is necessary to have the correct variant of migration without restrictions on the angle of reflectors, which is particularly important for the study of the geological structure of the mine fields.

The paper presents a three-dimensional variant of the full-wave finite-difference migration in the time scale of the depths. That variant allows defining delicate structural features of the environment, the velocity model of which can be non-uniform across the board. The effectiveness of the proposed method to study the geological structure of the mine fields is demonstrated on a model example and practical materials observed in the Donbas region.


Keywords


3D images; migration by CMP sum; mine fields

References


Antsiferov A. V., Tirkel M. G., Antsiferov V. A., 2008. Seismic rock mass. Donetsk: Veber, 204 p. (in Russian).

Verpahovskaya A. O., Pilipenko V. N., Kobolev V. P., 2013. Specifics of processing marine seismic observations using full-wave finite difference migration. Geofizicheskiy zhurnal 35(5), 187—195 (in Russian).

Dyadyura V. A., Budkevich V. B., 2005. Definition corrective static corrections for seismic ensembles equidistant Trace 3D. Collection of scientific papers UkrGGRI. Kiev: UkrGGRI Publ., number 3, 71—83 (in Russian).

Pilipenko V. N., Verpahovskaya A. O., Gnevush V. V., 2012. The finite-difference migration wave source seismograms common shot in the time domain. Geofizicheskiy zhurnal 34(3), 40—48 (in Russian).

Pilipenko V. N., Verpahovskaya A. O., Kekukh D. A., Pilipenko E. V., 2013. Continued time field in the three-dimensional inhomogeneous medium, the processing procedure and interpretation of seismic data. Geoinformatika (4), 32—43 (in Russian).

Samarskiy A. A., 1983. Theory of difference schemes. Moscow: Nauka, 616 p. (in Russian).

Bancroft J. C., 2007. A Practical Understanding of Pre- and Poststack migration. Vol. 1 (Poststack). Issue 13 of Course notes series. SEG Books, Science. 486 p.

Chun J. H., Jacewitz C., 1981. Fundamentals of frequency-domain migration. Geophysics 46, 717—732.

Claerbout J. F., Doherty S. N., 1972. Downward continuation of moveout corrected seismograms. Geophysics 37, 741—768.

Gazdag J., 1978. Wave-equation migration by phase shift. Geophysics 43, 124—131.

Hale D., 1991. 3-D depth migration by McClellan transformations. Geophysics 56, 1778—1785

Li Z., 1986. Wave-field extrapolation by the linearly transformed wave equation. Geophysics 51, 1538—1551.

Hoffe B. H., Burton A. J., Lines L. R., 1997. Comparison of 2D pre-stack and 3D post-stack migrations from the Matagami mining camp, Québec. CREWES Res. Report 9, 36—11.

Mayne W. H., 1962. Horizontal data stacking techniques. Supplement to Geophysics 27, 927—938.

Nemeth B., Danyluk T., Prugger A., 2002. Benefits of 3D poststack depth migration: Case study from the Potash Belt of Saskachewan Corporation of Saskatchewan Steve Halabura — North Rim Exp. CSEG Geophysics, P. 4.

Reshef M., Kessler D., 1989. Practical implementation of three-dimensional poststack depth migration. Geophysics 54, 309—318.

Yilmaz O., 2001. Seismic Data Analysis: Processing, Inversion and Interpretation of Seismic Data. Vols. 1 & 2. Society of Exploration Geophysicists, Tulsa Oklahoma, 2007 p.




Creative Commons License
Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Flag Counter