Protection of children’s rights and interests under war conditions in the east of Ukraine and in the annexed Crimea Republic: new challenges for Ukraine

Authors

  • Oleksandr Skrypniuk Institute of State and Law V. M. Koretsky National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine Trokhsviatytelska str., 4, Kyiv, Ukraine, 01601, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0155-9810
  • Lyudmila Tokarchuk Odessa I. I. Mechnikov National University Dvoryanska str., 2, Odessa, Ukraine, 65082, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/2523-4153.2020.210860

Keywords:

children’s rights protection, war, arm conflict, annexation, international standards, national legislation, international law

Abstract

The annexation of Crimea and Russian arm aggression at Donbas abruptly worsened the condition in the sphere of children protection and abruptly aggravated problems, which overcoming must be guided by state and social efforts.

Under these conditions the state government already in first months of arm actions took urgent measures for settlement of children, whose parents (one of parents) had died as a result of wound, contusion or inability, gotten in the districts of the anti-terrorist operation, in short terms (Order of the President № 835/2014 of 29.10.2014 “On urgent arrangements as to providing additional social guarantees for separate categories of citizens” (p. 5, part 1)).

Then accepted Laws of Ukraine “On provision of rights and freedoms of citizens and legal regime at the timely occupied territory of Ukraine”, “On timely arrangements for the period of the anti-terrorist operation” contain principles as to providing the educational process and social protection of children, norms of other laws – statements, directed on protection of rights of children in difficult living circumstances, on education, social protection, rest of children and so on.

In 2016 Article 1 of the Law of Ukraine “On childhood protection” was added by the term – a child, having suffered from military actions and arm conflicts, yet unknown to the national legislation.

The modern condition of the Ukrainian legislation needs improving a part of requirements to observing rights and interests of children, removed from AR Crimea, uncontrolled territory of the Donetsk and Lugansk region, that gives children a possibility to develop their potential as Ukrainian citizens, full-time responsible members of society.

At overcoming legislative gaps in the sphere of children’s rights protection in the arm conflict in Ukraine, the national legislation must be brought to correspondence with requirements of international legal acts.

Having ratified the Facultative protocol to the Convention as to children’s participation in arm conflicts, our state confirmed the readiness to oppose their huge harmful influence on children, condemned illegal encroachment on them under conditions of military actions, acknowledged a necessity to intensify children’s protection from a participation in arm conflicts. There is a series of problems, connected with realization of statements of the facultative protocol.

 The national legislation of Ukraine doesn’t determine if the Facultative protocol is a law of direct action, and if it can be directly used at court at protecting children’s rights, or it is necessary to refer to other – today absent – norms of the national legislation that explain its statements.

Ukraine has not ratified the Statute of the International criminal court that generates the condition of impunity of persons, committing crimes against children that are accepted as such by the international legislation on human rights and by the Roman statute, and violates the principle of inevitability of penalty for persons that commit military crimes against children.

The national legislation doesn’t contain norms that distinctly and unambiguously prohibit or introduce criminal responsibility for recruiting and using persons, younger than 18 years, in arm conflicts.

Observance of international standards of children’s rights protection in arm conflicts by Ukraine is a guarantee of preserving life, physical and psychical wholeness, health and relative social welfare of suffered children and their families and also of communities, both in the East of Ukraine and in regions, that settle migrants. A combination of efforts for providing children’s interests is an important precondition of integration to the European community and observance of general human values

Author Biographies

Oleksandr Skrypniuk, Institute of State and Law V. M. Koretsky National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine Trokhsviatytelska str., 4, Kyiv, Ukraine, 01601

Doctor of Law, Professor, Academician of the National Academy of Legal Sciences of Ukraine, Deputy Director for Scientific Work

Lyudmila Tokarchuk, Odessa I. I. Mechnikov National University Dvoryanska str., 2, Odessa, Ukraine, 65082

PhD, Professor

Department of Civil Law Disciplines

References

  1. Kraliuk, P. (2019). Stara stalіnska fіktsіia. Den, 7.
  2. Konchalovskii, A. (2014). Rossiia, kotoraia umiraet. Brestskaia gazeta, 3.
  3. Rukovodstvo ES po probleme detei v vooruzhennikh konfliktakh. Available at: https://www.refworld.org.ru/pdfid/5512c43f6.pdf
  4. Strashni tsyfry (2020). Den, 2.
  5. Shemshuchenko, Yu. S., Skrypniuk, O. V., Onishchenko, N. M., Denysov, V. N. et. al.; Shemshuchenko, Yu. S. (Ed.) (2020). Zakhyst prav ditei v umovakh zbroinoho konfliktu na skhodi Ukrainy ta v aneksovanii Avtonomnii Respublitsi Krym. Problemy zakhystu prav ditei u mizhnarodnomu pravi ta natsionalnomu zakonodavstvi Ukrainy. Kyiv, 160.
  6. Kochemyrovska, O. (2014). Shchodo dotrymannia Ukrainoiu mizhnarodnykh standartiv zakhystu prav ditei u zbroinykh konfliktakh. Analitychna zapyska. Sotsialna polityka, 11, 14.
  7. Lutkovska, V. (2014). Chynne zakonodavstvo rozrakhovane na myrnyi chas, y do tsoho chasu ne pryiniato zhodnoho normatyvnoho akta, spriamovanoho na zakhyst prav ditei v umovakh provedennia ATO.
  8. Mykoliuk, O. (2014). Viina – tse naibrutalnishe porushennia prav dytyny. Den, 157. Available at: http://www.day.kiev.ua/uk/article/cuspilstvo/viyna-ce-naybrutalnishe-porushennya-prav-ditini
  9. Ezhegodnii doklad Spetsialnogo predstavitelia Generalnogo sekretaria po voprosu o detiakh i vooruzhennykh konfliktakh Leily Zerrugi (A/HRC/25/46) (2013). Available at: http://www.ohchr.org/EN/HRBodies/HRC/RegularSessions/Session25/Documents/A-HRC-25-46_ru.doc
  10. Pro zupynennia dii Postanovy Verkhovnoi Rady Avtonomnoi Respubliky Krym vid 11 bereznia 2014 roku No. 1727-6/14 «Pro Deklaratsiiu pro nezalezhnist Avtonomnoi Respubliky Krym i mista Sevastopolia» (2014). Ukaz Prezydenta Ukrainy No. 296/2014. 14.03.2014. Available at: http://zakon4.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/296/2014;
  11. Rishennia Konstytutsiinoho Sudu Ukrainy u spravi za konstytutsiinym podanniam vykonuiuchoho oboviazky Prezydenta Ukrainy, Holovy Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy shchodo vidpovidnosti Konstytutsii Ukrainy (konstytutsiinosti) Postanovy Verkhovnoi Rady Avtonomnoi Respubliky Krym «Pro Deklaratsiiu pro nezalezhnist Avtonomnoi Respubliky Krym i mista Sevastopolia» No. 3-rp/2014. 20.03.2014 (2014). Ofitsiinyi Visnyk Ukrainy, 27, St. 776.
  12. Poslednye sobityia v Ukrayne: uhrozi dlia funktsyonyrovanyia demokratycheskykh ynstytutov (2014). Rezoliutsyia Parlamentskoi Assambley Soveta Evropi 1988 (2014) ot 9 aprelia 2014 h. (neofitsiinyi pereklad). Poshukova systema LIHA: Zakon Elit 9.1.2. Kod faila: MU14031.LHT.
  13. O priznanii Respubliki Krym (2014). Ukaz Prezidenta Rossiiskoi Federatsii No. 147. 17.03.2014. Available at: http://base.consultant.ru/cons/cgi/online.cgi?req=doc;base=LAW;n=160362
  14. Ob obrazovanii Krymskogo federalnogo okruga (2014). Ukaz Prezidenta Rossiiskoi Federatsii No. 168. 21.03.2014. Available at: http://base.consultant.ru/cons/cgi/online.cgi?req=doc;base=LAW;n=160616
  15. O priniatii v Rossiiskuiu Federatsiiu Respubliki Krym i obrazovanii v Sostave Rossiiskoi Federatsii novykh subektov – Respubliki Krym i goroda federalnogo znacheniia Sevastopolia (2014). Federalnii Konstitutsionnii Zakon Rossiiskoi Federatsii, odobren Gosudarstvennoi Dumoi 20 marta 2014 g. No. 6-FKZ, odobren Sovetom Federatsii 21 marta 2014 g. Available at: http://base.consultant.ru/cons/cgi/online.cgi?req=doc;base=LAW;n=160618
  16. Pro zabezpechennia prav i svobod hromadian ta pravovyi rezhym na tymchasovo okupovanii terytorii Ukrainy (2014). Zakon Ukrainy No. 1207-VII. 15.04.2014. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1207-18
  17. Pro tymchasovi zakhody na period provedennia antyterorystychnoi operatsii (2014). Zakon Ukrainy No. 1669-VII. 02.09.2014. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1669-18
  18. Shchodo orhanizatsii navchannia u zahalnoosvitnikh navchalnykh zakladakh osib, shcho prozhyvaiut na tymchasovo okupovanii terytorii v Avtonomnii Respublitsi Krym, misti Sevastopoli ta u mistsiakh provedennia antyterorystychnoi operatsii v Donetskii i Luhanskii oblastiakh (2014). Lyst Ministerstva osvity i nauky Ukrainy No. 1/9-535. 14.10.2014. Available at: http://ru.osvita.ua/legislation/Ser_osv/43287/
  19. Pro zatverdzhennia Poriadku zamovlennia, obliku i vydachi dublikativ ta vypravlenykh dokumentiv pro zahalnu seredniu osvitu derzhavnoho zrazka osobam, yaki zdobuly zahalnu seredniu osvitu u navchalnykh zakladakh na tymchasovo okupovanii terytorii Ukrainy ta u navchalnykh zakladakh okremykh naselenykh punktiv Donetskoi ta Luhanskoi oblastei (2014). Nakaz Ministerstva osvity i nauky Ukrainy No. 917. 08.08.2014. Zareiestrovanyi v Ministerstvi yustytsii Ukrainy 26 serpnia 2014 r. za No. 1024/2580 (u redaktsii zghidno z nakazom MON vid 26.12.2014 No. 1525). Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/z1024-14
  20. Pro vnesennia zmin do deiakykh zakonodavchykh aktiv Ukrainy shchodo posylennia sotsialnoho zakhystu ditei ta pidtrymky simei z ditmy (2016). Verkhovna Rada Ukrainy No. 936-VIII. 26.01.2016. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/936-19#n59
  21. Konventsiia pro zakhyst tsyvilnoho naselennia pid chas viiny (Zhenevska konventsiia 1949 r.) (1949). 12.08.1949. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/995_154
  22. Geneva Convention Relative To The Protection Of Civilian Persons In Time Of War of 12 august 1949 (1949). Available at: https://www.un.org/en/genocideprevention/documents/atrocity-crimes/Doc.33_GC-IV-EN.pdf
  23. Loizidou v. Turkey (40/1993/435/514) (1998). 28.07.1998. Available at: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-58201%22]}
  24. Cyprus v. Turkey (Application no. 25781/94). (2001). 10.05.2001. Available at: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng-press#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-59454%22]}
  25. Mozer v. the Republic of Moldova and Russia (Application no. 11138/10) (2010). 31.03.2010. Available at: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/fre#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-145069%22]}
  26. Ilaşcu and Others v. Moldova and Russia (Application no. 48787/99) (2004). 08.07.2004. Available at: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/fre#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-61886%22]}
  27. Itogi perepisi naseleniia v krymskom federalnom okruge (2015). Moscow: IITS «Statistika Rossii», 88. Available at: https://www.gks.ru/storage/mediabank/KRUM_2015.pdf
  28. REZOLIUTSIIA 2143 (2014). priniataia Sovetom Bezopasnosti Organizatsii Obedinennykh Natsii na ego 7129-m zasedanii (2014). Available at: http://search.ligazakon.ua/l_doc2.nsf/link1/MU14026.html
  29. Zakliuchni sposterezhennia shchodo dopovidei, podanykh derzhavamy-uchasnytsiamy vidpovidno do Statti 8 Fakultatyvnoho protokolu do Konventsii pro prava dytyny shchodo uchasti ditei u zbroinykh konfliktakh (CRC/C/OPAC/UKR/1) ta pysmovykh vidpovidei na perelik yoho zapytan (CRC/C/ OPAC/UKR/Q/1/Add.1) (2011).

Published

2020-07-10

How to Cite

Skrypniuk, O., & Tokarchuk, L. (2020). Protection of children’s rights and interests under war conditions in the east of Ukraine and in the annexed Crimea Republic: new challenges for Ukraine. ScienceRise: Juridical Science, (2 (12), 4–11. https://doi.org/10.15587/2523-4153.2020.210860

Issue

Section

Juridical Science