Problems of interpretation and constitutionality of the law of Ukraine No. 590-IX of 13.05.2020. analysis of the practice of its law enforcement
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15587/2523-4153.2020.212491Keywords:
banks, court proceedings, Law No. 590-IX of 13.05.2020, retroactive effect of the law in time, constitutionalityAbstract
In this article the author examines the problems of interpretation and constitutionality of the Law of Ukraine
No. 590-IX of 13.05.2020 "On Amendments to Legislative Acts of Ukraine to Improve Some Mechanisms for Banking Regulation" No. 590-IX, which entered into force on 23.05.2020.
In the context of this, the author analyzed the provisions of this Law for its compliance with the Constitution of Ukraine and international law, in particular with the principle of legal certainty and inadmissibility of retroactive effect of the law in time. To this end, the author examines and analyzes a number of decisions of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine and the case law of the European Court of Human Rights.
In particular, the author analyzed the provisions of the Law No. 590-IX for its compliance with Article 55 of the Con-stitution of Ukraine and Art. 13 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms in terms of the right to effective judicial protection and restoration of violated rights. The author also examined the ter-minology, used in the Law No. 590-IX for its clarity, unambiguity and compliance with the principle of legal certainty.
In this context, there were analyzed such decisions of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine as the decision of the Con-stitutional Court of Ukraine of 25 December 1997 in the case No. 9-zp, the decision of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine of 09.02.99 N 1-rp / 99, the decision of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine of April 5, 2001 No. 3-rp / 2001, decision of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine of January 26, 2011 No. 1-rp / 2011.
In addition, this article considers and studies the practice of applying the rules of this law by the courts of Ukraine in the context of real legal relations.
Based on the above, the author made a comprehensive analysis of this law, identified its shortcomings and proposed ways to eliminate them and suggestions for improving this law
References
- Tsarikova, O. V. (2018). Administratyvno-pravovi zasady derzhavnoho kontroliu za diialnistiu bankiv v Ukraini. Dnipro, 22.
- Hoikhman, M. I. (2017). Diahnostyka problemnykh sytuatsii ta derzhavne rehuliuvannia funktsionuvannia bankivskoho sektoru v Ukraini. Kyiv, 43.
- Latkovska, T. A. (2008). Finansovo-pravove rehuliuvannia orhanizatsii ta funktsionuvannia bankivskoi systemy v Ukraini ta zarubizhnykh krainakh: porivnialno-pravovyi analiz. Odesa, 37.
- Pro vnesennia zmin do deiakykh zakonodavchykh aktiv Ukrainy shchodo udoskonalennia mekhanizmiv rehuliuvannia bankivskoi diialnosti (2020). Zakon Ukrainy No. 590-IX. 13.05.2020. Holos Ukrainy. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/card/590-20
- Konstytutsiia Ukrainy (1996). Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy, 30, St. 141. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/254%D0%BA/96-%D0%B2%D1%80#Text
- Rishennia Konstytutsiinoho Sudu Ukrainy po spravi No. 9 zp. 25.12.1997. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/v009p710-97#Text
- Konventsiia pro zakhyst prav liudyny i osnovopolozhnykh svobod (1950). No. 995_004. 04.11.1950. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/995_004#Text
- Rishennia Yevropeiskoho sudu z prav liudyny roku u spravi “Afanasiev proty Ukrainy” (2005). No. 38722/02. 05.04.2005. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/980_239#Text
- Case of Bellet v. France (1995). European Court of Human Rights. 04.12.1995. Available at: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{%22fulltext%22:[%2223805/94%22],%22documentcollectionid2%22:[%22GRANDCHAMBER%22,%22CHAMBER%22],%22itemid%22:[%22001-57952%22]}
- Case of Ashingdane v. The United Kingdom (1985). European Court of Human Rights. 28.05.1985. Available at: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{%22fulltext%22:[%22Ashingdane%20v.%20the%20United%20Kingdom%22],%22documentcollectionid2%22:[%22GRANDCHAMBER%22,%22CHAMBER%22],%22itemid%22:[%22001-57425%22]}
- Rishennia Yevropeiskoho sudu z prav liudyny u spravi «Mosendz proty Ukrainy» (2013). No. 52013/08. 17.01.2013. Available at: https://cna.court.gov.ua/sud2590/2536/233223/6451/
- Rishennia Yevropeiskoho sudu z prav liudyny u spravi «Shestopalova proty Ukrainy» (2017). No. 55339/07. 21.12.2017. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/974_c61#Text
- Rishennia Konstytutsiinoho Sudu Ukrainy u spravi za konstytutsiinym zvernenniam Natsionalnoho banku Ukrainy shchodo ofitsiinoho tlumachennia polozhennia chastyny pershoi statti 58 Konstytutsii Ukrainy (sprava pro zvorotnu diiu v chasi zakoniv ta inshykh normatyvno-pravovykh aktiv) (1999). Rishennia Konstytutsiinoho Sudu Ukrainy No. 1-rp/99. 09.02.1999. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/v001p710-99#Text
- Rishennia Konstytutsiinoho Sudu Ukrainy u spravi za konstytutsiinym podanniam Prezydenta Ukrainy shchodo vidpovidnosti Konstytutsii Ukrainy (konstytutsiinosti) Zakonu Ukrainy "Pro vnesennia zmin do deiakykh zakonodavchykh aktiv Ukrainy" (sprava pro podatky) (2001). Rishennia Konstytutsiinoho Sudu Ukrainy No. 3-rp/2001. 05.04.2001. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/v003p710-01#Text
- Rishennia Konstytutsiinoho Sudu Ukrainy u spravi za konstytutsiinym podanniam Prezydenta Ukrainy shchodo vidpovidnosti Konstytutsii Ukrainy (konstytutsiinosti) Zakonu Ukrainy "Pro vnesennia zmin do deiakykh zakonodavchykh aktiv Ukrainy" (sprava pro podatky) (2011). Rishennia Konstytutsiinoho Sudu Ukrainy No. 1-rp/2011. 26.01.2011. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/v001p710-11#Text
- Rishennia Konstytutsiinoho Sudu Ukrainy u spravi za konstytutsiinymy podanniamy 53 i 47 narodnykh deputativ Ukrainy pro ofitsiine tlumachennia polozhennia chastyny tretoi statti 103 Konstytutsii Ukrainy (sprava shchodo strokiv perebuvannia na postu Prezydenta Ukrainy) (2003). Rishennia Konstytutsiinoho Sudu Ukrainy No. 22-rp/2003. 25.12.2003. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/v022p710-03#Text
- Case of Dimopulos v. Turkey (2019). European Court of Human Rights No. 37766/05. 02.07.2019. Available at: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/rus#{%22fulltext%22:[%2237766/05%22],%22documentcollectionid2%22:[%22GRANDCHAMBER%22,%22CHAMBER%22],%22itemid%22:[%22001-192443%22]}
- Ukhvala Hospodarskoho sudu m. Kyieva No. 910/18074/19. 22.07.2020 (2020). Available at: http://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/90592822
- Postanova Pivnichnoho apeliatsiinoho hospodarskoho sudu No. 910/18211/19. 21.07.2020 (2020). Available at: http://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/90593052
- Ukhvala Hospodarskoho sudu m. Kyieva No. 910/18211/19. 14.07.2020 (2020). Available at: http://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/90439016
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Viacheslav Krahlevych
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Our journal abides by the Creative Commons CC BY copyright rights and permissions for open access journals.
Authors, who are published in this journal, agree to the following conditions:
1. The authors reserve the right to authorship of the work and pass the first publication right of this work to the journal under the terms of a Creative Commons CC BY, which allows others to freely distribute the published research with the obligatory reference to the authors of the original work and the first publication of the work in this journal.
2. The authors have the right to conclude separate supplement agreements that relate to non-exclusive work distribution in the form in which it has been published by the journal (for example, to upload the work to the online storage of the journal or publish it as part of a monograph), provided that the reference to the first publication of the work in this journal is included.
