Juristic qualification of separate basements of labor contract denouncement because of revealed lack of conformity of the employee’s post held or job executed

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/2523-4153.2020.213645

Keywords:

labour function, insufficient qualification, attestation, health status of a worker, health status of a worker that prevents continuation of the work, medical-social examination, state secret

Abstract

Legal adjusting of the phenomenon of denouncement of a labour contract in connection with the educed disparity of a worker to a held post or executed work now is not covering the whole spectrum of features of grounds of such denouncement that predetermines the necessity of research of descriptions of its separate grounds. The purpose of the article is an exposure of the lacks of adjusting of denouncement of labour relations on the initiative of an employer in connection with the educed disparity of a worker to a held post or executed work and suggestion of ways of their solution. During the realization of the indicated research the following methods were used: dialectical, logical-legal, analysis and synthesis. By means of analysis and synthesis, the essence of grounds of labour contract denunciation because of disparity to a held post or executed work was described, and also basic ideas and vectors of development of the legal adjusting are educed and compared, in particular categorical apparatus within the limits of the research article. A dialectical method allowed to investigate general properties, copulas and conformities to law, that arise at the exposure of disparity of a worker to a held post or executed work. A logical-legal method was used for the formulation of suggestions in relation to further perfection of the legal adjusting of the institute of labour contract denunciation on the initiative of an employer. The results consist of the exposure of the importance of grant of the right to employers to denounce a labour contract at presence of corresponding grounds and substantiation of the necessity of improvement of positions within the limits of the considered theme, envisaged by the current legislation. Conclusion. The imperfection of the existent presently legal adjusting of exposure of disparity of a worker to a held post or executed work, resulted in labour contract denunciation, is manifested in gaps of the categorical apparatus within the limits of the considered question, in particular in absence of clear fixing of the concept "insufficient qualification", absence of the regulated methods of its exposure, direct obligation of an employer to break labour relations with a worker in statutory cases, is a limitation of him/her in the right to make a decision independently, is a considerable obstacle to an employer in establishment of an effective method of work execution and improvement of results of such execution

Author Biography

Sophia Shabanova, Yaroslav Mudryi National Law University Pushkinska str., 77, Kharkiv, Ukraine, 61024

PhD, Assistant

Department of Labor Law

References

  1. Konstytutsiia Ukrainy (1996). Zakon Ukrainy No. 254к/96-ВР. 28.06.1996. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/254к/96-вр#Text
  2. Bodnar, O. S. (2012). Yurydychni harantii trudovykh prav pratsivnykiv pid chas zvilnennia za nevidpovidnist zaimanii posadi. Naukovyi visnyk Dnipropetrovskoho derzhavnoho universytetu vnutrishnikh sprav, 1, 211–218.
  3. Spitsyna, H. (2015). The legal characteristic of labor agreements in Ukraine. Visegrad journal of human rights, 3 (1), 98–101.
  4. Kodeks zakoniv pro pratsiu Ukrainy (1971). Zakon Ukrainy No. 322-VII. 10.12.1971. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/322-08#Text
  5. Yaroshenko, O. M., Inshyn, M. I., Zhyhalkin, I. P., Pliesnov, K. M.; Yaroshenko, O. M., Inshyn, M. I. (Eds.) (2020). Rozirvannia trudovoho dohovoru u vypadku nevidpovidnosti pratsivnyka zaimanii posadi abo vykonuvanii roboti: aktualni pytannia pravovoi teorii ta praktyky. Kharkiv: Yurait, 196.
  6. Kravchenko, I. M. (2013). Nevidpovidnist pratsivnyka zaimanii posadi chy vykonuvanii roboti yak neobkhidna pidstava dlia rozirvannia trudovoho dohovoru z initsiatyvy robotodavtsia. Forum prava, 4, 178–183. Available at: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/FP_index.htm_2013_4_32
  7. Kravchenko, I. M. (2016). Shchodo pytannia udoskonalennia zakonodavstva Ukrainy, shcho poviazane iz rozirvanniam trudovoho dohovoru z initsiatyvy robotodavtsia u vypadku vyiavlennia nevidpovidnosti pratsivnyka zaimanii posadi abo vykonuvanii roboti. Aktualni problemy prava: teoriia i praktyka, 31, 242–254.
  8. Tsapenko, A. M. (2011). Zvilnennia pratsivnyka u razi skasuvannia dopusku do derzhavnoi taiemnytsi. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats Kharkivskoho natsionalnoho pedahohichnoho universytetu imeni H. S. Skovorody "Pravo", 17, 91–97.
  9. Shcherbyna, V. I. (2008). Trudove pravo Ukrainy. Kyiv: Istyna, 384.
  10. Vapniarchuk, N. (2012). Do pytannia pro rozirvannia trudovoho dohovoru za initsiatyvoiu robotodavtsia (p.2 st.40 KZpP Ukrainy). Visnyk akademii pravovykh nauk Ukrainy, 2, 159–166.
  11. Pro praktyku rozghliadu sudamy trudovykh sporiv (1992). Postanova Plenumu Verkhovnoho Sudu Ukrainy No. 92. 06.11.1992. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/v0009700-92#Text
  12. Kokhan, V. P. (2011). Pravove rehuliuvannia atestatsii pratsivnykiv za zakonodavstvom Ukrainy. Kyiv, 22.
  13. Pro profesiinyi rozvytok pratsivnykiv (2012). Zakon Ukrainy No. 4312–VI. 12.01.2012. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/4312-17#Text
  14. Prylypko, S. M., Yaroshenko, O. M. (2011). Trudove pravo Ukrainy. Kharkiv: FINN, 800.
  15. Lukasheva, N. M. (2009). Naslidky nevidpovidnosti pratsivnyka vymoham za stanom zdorovia. Uchenie zapysky Tavrycheskoho natsyaonalnoho unyversyteta ym. Vernadskoho, 22 (1 (61)), 157–164.
  16. Polozhennia pro medyko-sotsialnu ekspertyzu (2009). Postanova Kabinetu Ministriv Ukrainy No. 1317. 03.12.2009. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1317-2009-%D0%BF#Text
  17. Yatskevych, I. (2017). Elimination of employment discrimination of the persons with disabilities: International Standards and Ukrainian legislation. NaUKMA Research Papers. Law, 200, 41–46.
  18. Pliesnov, K. M. (2013). Rozirvannia trudovoho dohovoru u vypadku vyiavlenoi nevidpovidnosti pratsivnyka zaimanii posadi abo vykonuvanii roboti vnaslidok stanu zdorovia. Derzhavne budivnytstvo ta mistseve samovriaduvannia, 26, 271–279.
  19. Pro derzhavnu taiemnytsiu (1994). Zakon Ukrainy No. 3855–ХІІ. 21.01.1994. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/3855-12#Text
  20. Suprunenko, A. M., Bashta, I. I., Lyseiuk, A. M., Svirina, K. S. (2020). Orhanizatsiia okhorony derzhavnoi taiemnytsi v Ukraini. Irpin: UDFSU, 370.

Published

2020-09-30

How to Cite

Shabanova, S. (2020). Juristic qualification of separate basements of labor contract denouncement because of revealed lack of conformity of the employee’s post held or job executed. ScienceRise: Juridical Science, (3 (13), 20–26. https://doi.org/10.15587/2523-4153.2020.213645

Issue

Section

Juridical Science