Neurostimulating control of the blocks of medial branches of posterior rami of spinal nerves in treatment of the “pain facet syndrome” of lumbar spondyloarthritis and planning of denervation of zygapophysial joints
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15587/2519-4798.2016.85422Keywords:
pain facet-syndrome, neurostimulation, medial branches of posterior rami of spinal nervesAbstract
The aim of research is an improvement of blocks of medial branches of posterior rami of spinal nerves (MB PR SN) in treatment of the “pain facet syndrome” of lumbar spondyloarthritis and planning of denervation of zygapophysial joints by the additional identification of target nerves by neurostimulator.
Material and methods. 96 patients with lumbar “facet syndrome” (40 men and 56 women) 18 -75 years old. All patients underwent blocks of MB PR SN under “С-arm” control and electrostimulation by “B BRAUN Stimuplex Dig RC Nerve Stimulator”. The effectiveness of MB PR SN blocks was evaluated during a week, in 1, 3, 6 and 12 months by VAS and questionnaire Roland-Morris.
Results of research. At the beginning 524 blocks were done at the level L3-S1 in 96 (100 %) patients. 420 blocks in 70 patients at the levels L3-L4, L4-L5, L5-S1, and 104 ones in 26 patients at the levels L4-L5, L5-S1. The positive dynamics was observed during 3 months with decease of pain syndrome from 50 % to 72 %, and improvement of living activity from 50 % to 67 %. In 54 patients (56 %), the blocks were repeated at 7 day. That is 270 blocks in 45 patients at the levels L3-L4, L4-L5, L5-S1, and 36 blocks in 9 patients at the levels L4-L5, L5-S1. The positive dynamics was observed during 6 months with decrease of pain syndrome from 50 % to 58 %, and improvement of living activity from 38 % to 63 %. MB PR SN neurotomy was done in 18 patients (18,7 %) after two blocks under endoscopic control with decrease of pain syndrome by 63 %-86 % depending on age and improvement of living activity by 50 % - 75 % more than 1 year.
Conclusion. Electric stimulation of multi-sectional muscles during MB PR SN blocks allows reliably identify the necessary nerve rami, decrease the falsely positive and falsely negative results at anatomic variation of nerves location that gives a reason for using this method for both treatment of pain facet-syndrome and planning of ZJ denervation in patients with lumbar spondyloarthritisReferences
- Binder, D. S., Nampiaparampil, D. E. (2009). The provocative lumbar facet joint. Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine, 2 (1), 15–24. doi: 10.1007/s12178-008-9039-y
- Sirenko, A. A. (2011). Diagnostika, profilaktika i lecheni recidivov spondiloartralgii posle denervacii poyasnichnyh dugootrostchatyh sustavov. Kharkiv, 20.
- Radchenko, V., Kutsenko, V., Perfiliev, O., Popov, A. (2016). Neurotomy of the medial posterior branches of spinal nerves under endoscopic control in the treatment of lumbar syndrome spondyloarthralgiy. Orthopaedics, traumatology and prosthetics, 3, 16–21. doi: 10.15674/0030-59872016316-21
- Manchikanti, L., Pampati, V., Singh, V., Falco, F. J. (2013). Assessment of the escalating growth of facet joint interventions in the medicare population in the United States from 2000 to 2011. Pain Physician, 16 (4), E365–E378.
- Manchikanti, L., Kaye, A. D., Boswell, M. V., Bakshi, S., Gharibo, C. G., Grami, V., Grider, J. S. et. al. (2015). A systematic review and best evidence synthesis of the effec-tiveness of therapeutic facet joint interventions in managing chronic spinal pain. Pain Physician, 18 (4), E535–E582.
- Park, J. W., Cheon, M. W., Lee, M. H. (2016). Phantom Study of a New Laser-Etched Needle for Improving Visibility During Ultrasonography-Guided Lumbar Medial Branch Access With Novices. Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine, 40 (4), 575–582. doi: 10.5535/arm.2016.40.4.575
- Amrhein, T. J., Joshi, A. B., Kranz, P. G. (2016). Technique for CT Fluoroscopy–Guided Lumbar Medial Branch Blocks and Radiofrequency Ablation. American Journal of Roentgenology, 207 (3), 631–634. doi: 10.2214/ajr.15.15694
- Bogduk, N., Wilson, A. S., Tynan, W. T. (1982). The human lumbar dorsal rami. Journal of Anatomy, 134 (2), 383–397.
- Saito, T., Steinke, H., Miyaki, T., Nawa, S., Umemoto, K., Miyakawa, K. et. al. (2013). Analysis of the Posterior Ramus of the Lumbar Spinal Nerve. Anesthesiology, 118 (1), 88–94. doi: 10.1097/aln.0b013e318272f40a
- Cohen, S. P., Raja, S. N. (2007). Pathogenesis, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Lumbar Zygapophysial (Facet) Joint Pain. Anesthesiology, 106 (3), 591–614. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200703000-00024
- Rocha, I., Cristante, A., Marcon, R., Oliveira, R., Letaif, O., Barros Filho, T. (2014). Controlled medial branch anesthetic block in the diagnosis of chronic lumbar facet joint pain: the value of a three-month follow-up. Clinics, 69 (8), 529–534. doi: 10.6061/clinics/2014(08)05
- Cohen, S. P., Moon, J. Y., Brummett, C. M., White, R. L., Larkin, T. M. (2015). Medial Branch Blocks or Intra-Articular Injections as a Prognostic Tool Before Lumbar Facet Radiofrequency Denervation. Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, 40 (4), 376–383. doi: 10.1097/aap.0000000000000229
- Radchenko, V., Perfiliev, O., Larichev, V. (2016). The peculiarities of location of medial twigs of posterior branches of spinal nerves (topographic-anatomical studies). Orthopaedics, traumatology and prosthetics, 1, 78–83. doi: 10.15674/0030-59872016178-83
- Cohen, S. P., Williams, K. A., Kurihara, C., Nguyen, C., Shields, C., Kim, P. et. al. (2010). Multicenter, Randomized, Comparative Cost-effectiveness Study Comparing 0, 1, and 2 Diagnostic Medial Branch (Facet Joint Nerve) Block Treatment Paradigms before Lumbar Facet Radiofrequency Denervation. Anesthesiology, 113 (2), 395–405. doi:10.1097/aln.0b013e3181e33ae5
- Van Zundert, J., Mekhail, N., Vanelderen, P., van Kleef, M. (2010). Diagnostic Medial Branch Blocks before Lumbar Radiofrequency Zygapophysial (Facet) Joint Denervation. Anesthesiology, 113 (2), 276–278. doi: 10.1097/aln.0b013e3181e33b02
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2016 Олександр Вячеславович Перфільєв
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Our journal abides by the Creative Commons CC BY copyright rights and permissions for open access journals.
Authors, who are published in this journal, agree to the following conditions:
1. The authors reserve the right to authorship of the work and pass the first publication right of this work to the journal under the terms of a Creative Commons CC BY, which allows others to freely distribute the published research with the obligatory reference to the authors of the original work and the first publication of the work in this journal.
2. The authors have the right to conclude separate supplement agreements that relate to non-exclusive work distribution in the form in which it has been published by the journal (for example, to upload the work to the online storage of the journal or publish it as part of a monograph), provided that the reference to the first publication of the work in this journal is included.