A comparison of the e-government system architecture in Jordan with the E-government system of the United States

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/2312-8372.2017.100190

Keywords:

E-government system architecture, E-government services, E-government system in Jordan

Abstract

The research seeks to examine the structure of the E-government system in Jordan and comparing it with that of the United States. The research is based on the finding that few researchers have attempted to develop a good analysis of the Jordanian e-government system architecture, especially by making comparisons with those of developed nations like the US. Consequently, there is a knowledge gap in this field, which should be filled by analyzing the nation’s e-government system architecture and comparing it with that of a developed nation. The aim of this study was to determine the structure and composition of the e-government system architecture in Jordan. In particular, the study sought to determine how the structure is set and how it works by analyzing it in comparison to that of the United States, a developed nation and one of the countries that was among the first to adopt e-government systems. The researcher seeks to analyze the e-government architecture adopted in Jordan (a developing nation), to compare the e-government architecture in Jordan with that of the US and to determine the challenges facing the architecture in the country. Based on a qualitative analysis of the e-government system architecture in Jordan and comparing it with that of the United States, the study finds that the E-government system in Jordan has improved service delivery to the citizens because it provides timely, less costly and effective services. Nevertheless, it is prone to information threats and needs continuous improvement. Further, it is also less effective compared to that of the US, especially because the level of hierarchy in the Jordanian government is higher than that of the US. Despite this, it has been found that new e-government system has an advantage because it can continuously be improved by adding new technologies and infrastructure to tackle the above-mentioned problems.

Author Biography

Mohammad Alhawawsha, Taras Shevchnko National University of Kyiv, 60, Volodymyrska str., Kyiv, Ukraine, 01033

Postgraduate Student

Department of Information Systems

References

  1. Kaylor, C., Deshazo, R., Van Eck, D. (2001). Gauging e-government: A report on implementing services among American cities. Government Information Quarterly, 18 (4), 293–307. doi:10.1016/s0740-624x(01)00089-2
  2. Ebrahim, Z., Irani, Z. (2005). E‐government adoption: architecture and barriers. Business Process Management Journal, 11 (5), 589–611. doi:10.1108/14637150510619902
  3. Hashemi, S., Monfaredi, K., Masdari, M. (2013). Using Cloud Computing for E-Government: Challenges and Benefits. International Journal of Computer, Electrical, Automation, Control and Information Engineering, 7 (9), 1240–1247.
  4. Ndou, V. (2004). E-Government for Developing Countries: Opportunities and Challenges. The Electronic Journal on Information Systems in Developing Countries, 18, 1–24. Available: http://www.ejisdc.org/ojs2./index.php/ejisdc/article/view/110
  5. Pokharel, M., Park, J. S. (2009). Cloud computing. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance – ICEGOV ’09. ACM Press, 409–410. doi:10.1145/1693042.1693134
  6. Dias, G. P., Rafael, J. A. (2007). A simple model and a distributed architecture for realizing one-stop e-government. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 6 (1), 81–90. doi:10.1016/j.elerap.2006.02.001
  7. Schuppan, T. (2009). E-Government in developing countries: Experiences from sub-Saharan Africa. Government Information Quarterly, 26 (1), 118–127. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2008.01.006
  8. Ziegler, P., Dittrich, K. R. (2004). Three Decades of Data Intecration – all Problems Solved? IFIP International Federation for Information Processing. Springer US, 3–12. doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-8157-6_1
  9. Weerakkody, V., Janssen, M., Hjort-Madsen, K. (2007). Integration and Enterprise Architecture Challenges in E-Government. International Journal of Cases on Electronic Commerce, 3 (2), 13–35. doi:10.4018/jcec.2007040102
  10. Dada, D. (2006). The Failure of E-Government in Developing Countries: A Literature Review. The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 26, 1–10. Available: http://www.ejisdc.org/ojs2./index.php/ejisdc/article/view/277
  11. Kontogiannis, K., Lewis, G. A., Smith, D. B., Litoiu, M., Muller, H., Schuster, S., Stroulia, E. (2007). The landscape of service-oriented systems: A research perspective. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Systems Development in SOA Environments. IEEE Computer Society, 1. doi:10.1109/sdsoa.2007.12
  12. Sharma, S. K., Gupta, J. N. D. (2004). Web services architecture for m-government: issues and challenges. Electronic Government, an International Journal, 1 (4), 462–474. doi:10.1504/eg.2004.005921
  13. Al-Omari, H. (2006). E-Government Architecture In Jordan: A Comparative Analysis. Journal of Computer Science, 2 (11), 846–852. doi:10.3844/jcssp.2006.846.852
  14. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. Available: https://www.un.org/development/desa/en/
  15. UN E-Government Survey 2014. Available: https://publicadministration.un.org/egovkb/en-us/reports/un-e-government-survey-2014
  16. Seebach, P. (2006, June 13). The Interchange File Format (IFF). Simple, portable, and extensible data storage. IBM. Available: https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/library/pa-spec16/
  17. UDDI XML.org web site. Available: http://uddi.xml.org/

Downloads

Published

2017-03-30

How to Cite

Alhawawsha, M. (2017). A comparison of the e-government system architecture in Jordan with the E-government system of the United States. Technology Audit and Production Reserves, 2(2(34), 18–24. https://doi.org/10.15587/2312-8372.2017.100190

Issue

Section

Information Technologies: Original Research