Development of methodology of efficiency estimation of management technology of project-oriented organizations

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/2312-8372.2017.100213

Keywords:

project-oriented enterprise, operating subsystem, project subsystem, bi-adaptive management, homeostatic approach

Abstract

Support for the competitiveness of modern companies is realized through the application of the methodology of project management. The project management subsystem should be harmoniously integrated into the enterprise management system. At the same time, the coordinated operation of the project and operating subsystems should be ensured.

The interaction of the project and operating subsystems of the project-oriented enterprise can be realized within the framework of several approaches – the homeostatic approach, the bi-adaptive management approach.

To create management systems for project-oriented enterprises that work in concert, it is necessary to evaluate the interaction of management subsystems.

The article poses the task of estimation of the interaction between the projects subsystem and operating subsystem of a project-oriented enterprise. The essential parameters of the operating subsystem and project subsystem are divided into ten groups of parameters. In the operating subsystem 28 parameters are allocated, in the project subsystem – 27.

A method of combined analytical and expert estimation of the mutual influence of the project and operating subsystems of the project-oriented enterprise (MAEM method) is proposed. The eight steps of the method implementation are described – an analytical estimation of the state of parameters that can be estimated accurately; Selection of candidates for two expert groups (from operating managers and project managers); Determination of competence coefficients of candidates for experts; Identification of experts; Estimation by experts of the interaction between the parameters of the project and operating subsystems; Determination of the most sensitive parameters; Determination of deviations between expert group estimates; Formulation of conclusions. The method is based on expert estimation

The strengths, weaknesses of the method, its opportunities and threats are analyzed.

The method will allow to create coordinated control systems for project-oriented enterprises.

Author Biographies

Alexander Timinsky, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, 64/13, Volodymyrska str., Kyiv, Ukraine, 01601

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Management Technologies

Ivan Oberemok, Kyiv National University of Construction and Architecture, 31, Povitroflotsky ave., Kyiv-037, Ukraine, 03680

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Project Management

Nataliia Oberemok, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, 64/13, Volodymyrska str., Kyiv, Ukraine, 01601

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Geoinformatics

References

  1. A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide). Ed. 5. (2013). Project Management Institute, 590.
  2. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harold_Kerzner">Kerzner, H. (2009). Project Management: A Systems Approach to Planning, Scheduling, and Controlling. Ed. 10. USA, New Jersey: Wiley, 1120.
  3. P2M «Program & Project Management for Enterprise Innovation». (2016). Project Management Association of Japan. Available: http://www.pmaj.or.jp/ENG/p2m/p2m_guide/p2m_guide.html
  4. The Standard for Portfolio Management. Ed. 3. (2013). Project Management Institute, 189.
  5. ICB: IPMA Competence Baseline Version 3.0. (2006). IPMA, Netherlands, 200.
  6. ISO 21500:2012. Guidance on project management. (2012). Project Committee ISO/PC 236, 36.
  7. Champy, J. (2002). X-Engineering the Corporation: Reinventing Your Business in the Digital Age (Hardcover). New York: Warner Business Books, 232.
  8. Teslya, Yu., Timinsky, A. (2015). Analysis of approaches to constructing bi-adaptive management systems of project-oriented enterprises. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 2(3(74)), 38–42. doi:10.15587/1729-4061.2015.39988
  9. Oberemok, I. (2014). Flexible approach to the implementation of corporate project management system. Management of Development of Complex Systems, 17, 42–45.
  10. Oberemok, I. (2014) Homeostatic approach to project management. Management of Development of Complex Systems, 19, 50–53.

Published

2017-03-30

How to Cite

Timinsky, A., Oberemok, I., & Oberemok, N. (2017). Development of methodology of efficiency estimation of management technology of project-oriented organizations. Technology Audit and Production Reserves, 2(2(34), 24–29. https://doi.org/10.15587/2312-8372.2017.100213

Issue

Section

Information Technologies: Original Research