Modeling of intercity passenger transportation system

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/2312-8372.2017.100465

Keywords:

route system, transportation efficiency, passenger correspondence, transportation process

Abstract

The modern state of modeling of intercity passenger transportation systems is considered. It is determined that the search for various options for technologies of interaction between the society and the transport industry is constantly at the stage of searching for the best possible methods of transportation organization. To assess the proposed scientific approaches, full-scale measurements are carried out on the route flows of passengers on sections of route routes. The approach to modeling intercity passenger route transportation systems is considered as original in the article, taking into account economic, social and organizational components. These components determine the overall efficiency of the transport process. Together with this, the above approach can be improved. To do this, it is desirable to consider in more detail individual subsystems by mode of transport and separately allocate night and day transportation. Practitioners note that with the same parameters of the trip, people feel differently the consequences of a day and night trip. This can lead to different requirements for the transport network as a whole. But the above algorithm allows to take this into account. The means for assessing the performance parameters of the system of routes for passenger transportation systems are explored. The sequence of formation of the transportation system of intercity passenger transport is proposed, which relies on the achievements of science and practice and takes into account the patterns of distribution of transport correspondence between cities from the transport network. The attraction functions between cities are complemented in accordance with the number of inhabitants and purchasing power. New information has been obtained on the modeling of transport route systems for transportation of passengers between cities within the investigated system. This is more advantageous in comparison with analogues due to the consideration of ensuring the social and economic characteristics of the population, the possibility of increasing productivity by optimizing the use of the route network and meeting the economic interests of the transport industry.

This is more advantageous in comparison with the analogues due to ensuring the registration of social and economic characteristics of the population of Ukraine, a possible increase in productivity by optimizing the use of the route network, satisfaction of economic interests of the transport industry.

Author Biography

Constantine Dolya, O. M. Beketov National University of Urban Economy in Kharkiv, Kulikovska descent str., 12, Kharkiv, Ukraine, 61002

PhD, Senior Lecturer

Department of GIS, Land and Real Estate Appraisal

References

  1. Khan, A. M. (1981). II. Intercity passenger transportation: energy efficiency and conservation case study. Transportation Planning and Technology, 7 (1), 1–9. doi:10.1080/03081068108717200
  2. Seedat, I. (2007). Implementing the 2007 Public Transport Strategy and Action Plan. Civil Engineering, 13–16.
  3. Crozet, Y. (2010). The Prospects for Inter-Urban Travel Demand. The Future for Interurban Passenger Transport, 57–94. doi:10.1787/9789282102688-3-en
  4. Nokandeh, M. M., Ghosh, I., Chandra, S. (2016). Determination of Passenger-Car Units on Two-Lane Intercity Highways under Heterogeneous Traffic Conditions. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 142 (2), 04015040. doi:10.1061/(asce)te.1943-5436.0000809
  5. Joseph, P. (2016). Schwieterman. Michigan Historical Review, 42 (1), 110–111. doi:10.5342/michhistrevi.42.1.0110
  6. Borndörfer, R., Reuther, M., Schlechte, T., Waas, K., Weider, S. (2016). Integrated Optimization of Rolling Stock Rotations for Intercity Railways. Transportation Science, 50 (3), 863–877. doi:10.1287/trsc.2015.0633
  7. Li, T. (2016). A Demand Estimator Based on a Nested Logit Model. Transportation Science, 41–59. doi:10.1287/trsc.2016.0671
  8. Prasolenko, О., Lobashov, O., Galkin, A. (2015). The Human Factor in Road Traffic City. International Journal of Automation, Control and Intelligent Systems, 1 (3), 77–84.
  9. Grigorova, T., Davidich, Yu., Dolya, V. (2015). Transport Fatigue Simulation of Passengers in Suburban Service. International Journal of Automation, Control and Intelligent Systems, 1 (2), 87–99.
  10. Grigorovа, T., Davidich, Yu., Dolya, V. (2015). Assessment of elasticity of demand for services of suburban road passenger transport. Technology audit and production reserves, 3(2(23)), 13–16. doi:10.15587/2312-8372.2015.44768
  11. Park, M., Hahn, J. (2015). Regional Freight Demand Estimation Using Korean Commodity Flow Survey Data. Transportation Research Procedia, 11, 504–514. doi:10.1016/j.trpro.2015.12.042
  12. Andronov, A., Santalova, D. (2009). On Nonlinear Regression Model for Correspondence Matrix of Transport Network. Selected papers of the The XIII International Conference «Applied Stochastic Models and Data Analysis» (ASMDA-2009). Vilnius, 90–94.
  13. Baik, H., Trani, A., Hinze, N., Swingle, H., Ashiabor, S., Seshadri, A. (2008). Forecasting Model for Air Taxi, Commercial Airline, and Automobile Demand in the United States. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2052, 9–20. doi:10.3141/2052-02
  14. Wu, C., Han, J., Hayashi, Y. (2011). Airport attractiveness analysis through a gravity model: A case study of Chubu International Airport in Japan. Proceedings of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies The 9th International Conference of Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies, 8, 8.
  15. Vrtic, M., Fröhlich, P., Schüssler, N., Axhausen, K. W., Lohse, D., Schiller, C., Teichert, H. (2007). Two-dimensionally constrained disaggregate trip generation, distribution and mode choice model: Theory and application for a Swiss national model. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 41 (9), 857–873. doi:10.1016/j.tra.2006.10.003
  16. Rwakarehe, E. E., Zhong, M., Christie, J. (2014). Development of a Freight Demand Model for the Province of Alberta Using Public Sources of Data. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 138, 695–705. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.07.263
  17. Fornalchyk, Ye., Bilous, A., Demchuk, I. (2015). The Model of Correspondence of Passenger Transportation on the Basis of Fuzzy Logic. Econtechmod. An International Quarterly Journal, 04 (2), 59–64.
  18. Dolya, C. (2017). Modeling of passenger transport correspondence between regional centers in Ukraine. Technology audit and production reserves, 1(2(33)), 44–48. doi:10.15587/2312-8372.2017.93458

Published

2017-03-30

How to Cite

Dolya, C. (2017). Modeling of intercity passenger transportation system. Technology Audit and Production Reserves, 2(2(34), 37–43. https://doi.org/10.15587/2312-8372.2017.100465

Issue

Section

Systems and Control Processes: Original Research