Research of the aspects of modeling of the project management of risk of implementation system information support

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/2312-8372.2018.124538

Keywords:

modeling of risk management, information technology projects, implementation of the information support system

Abstract

The object of research is the risk management of the information support system of enterprise management. One of the most problematic places is the identification of anticipated risks and their minimization. The process of risk management is associated with the complexity and duration of the implementation of the information management system of the enterprise and its relatively high cost.

In the course of the study, the modeling approaches of the project risk management process were used. Stages of modeling the process of risk management of the project of implementing the information support system are determined. They include the identification and assessment of project risks, an analysis of key risks and opportunities, the definition of strategies and methods for responding to risks. As well as the development and implementation of action plans to minimize risks, measure, monitor and report on risk management activities with an analysis of the results of management decisions. For their implementation, a standard BPwin program procedure is proposed with the possibility of ABC estimation of the cost of performing each stage.

Thanks to this, it is possible to control the production costs at every stage of the information support system. In comparison with similar known methods, approaches are suggested that minimize the loss of the management of enterprise management information systems as a result of the impact of risks through predictability and minimizing the risks to which the project is exposed.

Author Biographies

Vitalina Babenko, V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, 4, Svobody sq., Kharkiv, Ukraine, 61022

Doctor of Economic Sciences, Professor

Department of International Business and Economic Theory 

Oleksandr Nakisko, Kharkiv Petro Vasylenko National Technical University of Agriculture, 44, Artema str., Kharkiv, Ukraine, 61002

PhD

Department of Accounting and Audit

Inna Mykolenko, Poltava State Agrarian Academy, 1/3, G. Skovoroda str., Poltava, Ukraine, 36003

PhD

Department of Enterprise Economics

References

  1. Baronov, V. V. et al. (2000). Avtomatizatsiya upravleniya predpriyatiem. Moscow: INFRA-M, 239.
  2. Maklakov, S. V. (2002). Modelirovanie biznes-protsessov s BPwin 4.0. Moscow: Dialog-mifi, 224.
  3. Malyarets, L., Draskovic, M., Babenko, V., Kochuyeva, Z. et al. (2017). Theory and practice of controlling at enterprises in international business. Economic Annals-ХХI, 165 (5–6), 90–96. doi:10.21003/ea.v165-19
  4. Turner, R., Ledwith, A., Kelly, J. (2012). Project management in small to medium‐sized enterprises. Management Decision, 50 (5), 942–957. doi:10.1108/00251741211227627
  5. Larson, E., Larson, R. (2009). Managing Small Projects. The Critical Steps. Watermark Learning, 12.
  6. Pollack, J., Adler, D. (2014). Does Project Management Affect Business Productivity? Evidence From Australian Small to Medium Enterprises. Project Management Journal, 45 (6), 17–24. doi:10.1002/pmj.21459
  7. Pollack, J., Adler, D. (2015). The relationship between project management and small to medium enterprise profitability. Global Conference on Business and Finance Proceedings, 10 (1), 344–355.
  8. Perez-Ezcurdia, A., Marcelino-Sdeba, S. (2012). The small project paradox in SMEs. Prime Journal of Business Administration and Management, 2 (9), 687–692.
  9. Babenko, V. O. (2016). Informatsiine zabezpechennia optymizatsii upravlinnia innovatsiinoiu diialnistiu pidpryiemstv Ukrainy. Enerhosberezhenye. Enerhetyka. Enerhoaudyt, 11 (154), 40–52.
  10. Barykin, A. N., Ikryannikov, V. O. (2013). Vozmozhnye puti primeneniya biznes-modelirovaniya v upravlenii proektami razvitiya malykh mnogoprofil'nykh kompaniy. Menedzhment innovatsiy, 3 (23), 226–239.
  11. Babenko, V. A. (2016). Dynamical models of the minimax program management of innovation processes in interprises with risks. Doslidzhennia ta optymizatsiia ekonomichnykh protsesiv «Optymum–2016». Kharkiv: NTU «KhPI», 71–73.
  12. Dosyukov, S. (2013, November). Distributed Information Systems. From A to Z Embarcadero Developer Network. Available at: http://dn.codegear.com/article/30025
  13. Gayfullin, B., Obukhov, I. (2001). Sovremennye sistemy upravleniya predpriyatiem. Part 1. Sredstva i sistemy komp'yuternoy avtomatizatsii. Available at: http://www.asutp.ru/?p=600254
  14. Murphy, A., Ledwith, A. (2007). Project management tools and techniques in high‐technology SMEs. Management Research News, 30 (2), 153–166. doi:10.1108/01409170710722973
  15. Vitlinskiy, V. V., Babenko, V. A. (2012). Obzor metodov kolichestvennoy otsenki vliyaniya riskov v agropromyshlennom proizvodstve. Rinkova transformatsіya ekonomіki, 14, 78–87.
  16. Babenko, V. A. (2012). Pokazately ekonomycheskoi effektyvnosty vnedrenyia ynformatsyonnoi systemi upravlenyia ynnovatsyonnimy protsessamy predpryiatyia. Naukovi pratsi Poltavskoi derzhavnoi ahrarnoi akademii. Seriia «Ekonomichni nauky», 2 (2 (5)), 7–11.
  17. Luo, W., Strong, D. (2004). A Framework for Evaluating ERP Implementation Choices. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 51 (3), 322–333. doi:10.1109/tem.2004.830862
  18. ISO 31000: Principles and Guidelines on Implementation. International Organization for Standartiztion, 20.

Downloads

Published

2017-12-28

How to Cite

Babenko, V., Nakisko, O., & Mykolenko, I. (2017). Research of the aspects of modeling of the project management of risk of implementation system information support. Technology Audit and Production Reserves, 1(4(39), 64–69. https://doi.org/10.15587/2312-8372.2018.124538

Issue

Section

Economics and Enterprise Management: Original Research