Comparative analysis of the efficiency of gas boilers by express method of multi-criteria assessment

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/2312-8372.2018.146126

Keywords:

gas boiler, energy equipment efficiency, system analysis, weighting factor

Abstract

The object of the research is a method of fast analysis of multi-criteria evaluation on the example of comparing the efficiency of domestic gas WHGA-type boilers. Currently, the Ukrainian market offers a large number of gas boilers of Ukrainian and foreign manufacturing plants, which has minor differences. This is primarily due to the simplicity of the constructive solution of gas boilers of this model and using the same Italian burner devices and automation units for them.

Comparing the efficiencyof this type of product is a big problem. Existing methods of calculating efficiencyindicators and existing regulatory documents do not always give a correct value of product quality. Therefore this paper proposes a new method of express analysis of efficiency comparison, which allows in a short time to make a correct comparison of the efficiencyof boiler equipment without using a large number of calculations that require a lot of time. This problem is solved by choosing three anchor efficiency criteria, namely, energy, environmental and economic, with the subsequent determination of the confidence intervals of each of the indicators and the construction of a three-criterion diagram on their basis. This method allows to visually see the disadvantages and advantages of each of the boilers, plan measures for their modernization and determine their rating.

In the course of the research, materials from a technical report of warm-heat tests of seven gas boilers using the standard technique were used. The analysis of the results was performed using the sum method followed by ranking of affects and subsequent verification of the proposed quick method of comparison of effectiveness. The obtained qualitative result allows to conclude that the proposed express method in more detail and correctly than other known methods of analysis determines the rating position of each boiler. This allows a potential investor to draw the right conclusion when replacing and purchasing new boiler equipment. Using the method of express analysis allows manufacturers of boiler equipment to conduct a real assessment of product quality and identify ways to overcome its shortcomings.

Author Biographies

Volodymyr Demchenko, Institute of Engineering Thermophysics of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, 2a, Zhelyabova str., Kyiv, Ukraine, 03057

PhD, Senior Researcher, Head of Department

Department of Processes and Technologies of Heat Supply

Andrii Trubachev, Institute of Engineering Thermophysics of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, 2a, Zhelyabova str., Kyiv, Ukraine, 03057

PhD, Senior Researcher

Department of Processes and Technologies of Heat Supply

Serhii Hron, Institute of Engineering Thermophysics of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, 2a, Zhelyabova str., Kyiv, Ukraine, 03057

Engineer

References

  1. Demchenko, V. G. (2018). Provedennia eksperymentalnykh teplo-ekolohichnykh vyprobuvan ta porivnialnykh rozrakhunkiv vodohriynykh kotliv, shcho pratsiuiut na hazovomu palyvi. Available at: https://atem.ua/files/Reklama/%D0%9E%D1%82%D1%87%D0%B5%D1%82%20%D0%9D%D0%90%D0%9D%20%D1%83%D0%BA%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%B8%D0%BD%D1%8B%20%D0%BE%20%D0%BA%D0%BE%D1%82%D0%BB%D0%B0%D1%85%200002.pdf
  2. Kuznecov, N. V. et. al. (1973). Teplovoy raschet kotel'nyh agregatov. Normativniy metod. Moscow: Energiya, 296.
  3. Sigal, I. Ya. (Ed.) (1992). Metodicheskoe posobie po provedeniyu kompleksnyh ekologo-teplotekhnicheskih ispytaniy kotlov, rabotayushchih na gaze i mazute. Kyiv, 213.
  4. Trebovaniya po effektivnomu ispol'zovaniyu prirodnogo gaza i ohrane okruzhayushchey sredy pri provedenii naladochnyh rabot toplivoispol'zuyushchego oborudovaniya (1995). Kyiv: Goskomneftegazprom.
  5. GDK 34.02.305-2002. Vikidi zabrudnyuyuchih rechovin v atmosferu vіd energetichnih ustanovok. Metodika viznachennya (2002). Kyiv.
  6. Saaty, T. L. (2001). Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback: The Analytic Network Process. Rws Publications, 370.
  7. Belyaev, I. P. (2005). Osnovy teorii prinyatiya resheniy. Moscow: MGSU, 275.
  8. Andreychikov, A. V., Andreychikova, O. N. (2004). Analiz, sintez, planirovanie resheniy v ekonomike. Moscow: Finansy i statistika, 464.
  9. Demchenko, V. G. (2017). Bahatokryterialna otsinka zakhodiv po optymizatsiyi spozhyvannia teplovoi enerhiyi. Sbornik trudov XXVI mezhdunarodnoy konferencii «Problemy ekologii i ekspluatacii ob'ektov energetiki». Odessa, 53–56.
  10. Saaty, T. L. (2008). Relative measurement and its generalization in decision making why pairwise comparisons are central in mathematics for the measurement of intangible factors the analytic hierarchy/network process. Revista de La Real Academia de Ciencias Exactas, Fisicas y Naturales. Serie A. Matematicas, 102 (2), 251–318. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03191825
  11. Banker, R. D., Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W. (1984). Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis. Management Science, 30 (9), 1078–1092. doi: https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.30.9.1078
  12. Cooper, W. W., Seiford, L. M., Tone, K. (2007). Data Envelopment Analysis. A Comprehensive Text with Models, Applications, References and DEA-Solver Software. Springer-Verlag. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-45283-8
  13. Drake, P. R. (1998). Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process in Engineering Education. International Journal of Engineering Education, 14 (3), 191–196.
  14. Hallowell, D. L. Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) – Getting Oriented. Available at: https://www.isixsigma.com/tools-templates/analytic-hierarchy-process-ahp/analytical-hierarchy-process-ahp-%E2%90%93-getting-oriented/
  15. Saaty, T. L. (2015). On the measurement of intangibles. A principal eigenvector approach to relative measurement derived from paired comparisons. Cloud of Science, 2 (1).
  16. Saaty, T. L. (2016). Relative Measurement and Its Generalization in Decision Making. Why Pairwise Comparisons are Central in Mathematics for the Measurement of Intangible Factors. Cloud of Science, 3 (2), 171–262. Available at: https://cloudofscience.ru/sites/default/files/pdf/CoS_3_171.pdf
  17. Demchenko, V. G., Trubachev, A. S. (2018). Ekspres-analiz dotsilnosti provedennia enerhozberihaiuchykh zakhodiv. The scientific method, 20, 74–77.
  18. Demchenko, V. G., Trubachev, A. S., Falko, V. Yu., Hron, S. S. (2018). Mobilni akumuliatory dlia dyskretnykh system teplokholodopostachannia. Chastyna 2. Promyslova teplotekhnika, 40 (3), 56–68.
  19. Mezhotraslevye normy raskhodov topliva dlya otopitel'nyh kotlov, kotorye ekspluatiruyutsya v Ukraine: Prikaz Goskomenergosberezheniya No. 46 ot 7.05.2001.
  20. Zvit pro postachannia teploenerhiyi: Instruktsiya shchodo zapovnennia formy derzhavnoho statystychnoho sposterezhennia N 1-tep. Zatverdzheno nakazom Derzhavnoho komitetu statystyky Ukrainy vid 17.08.2004. No. 482. Zareiestrovano v Ministerstvi yustytsiyi Ukrainy 31.08. 2004 r. za No. 1079/9678.

Published

2018-05-17

How to Cite

Demchenko, V., Trubachev, A., & Hron, S. (2018). Comparative analysis of the efficiency of gas boilers by express method of multi-criteria assessment. Technology Audit and Production Reserves, 5(1(43), 34–41. https://doi.org/10.15587/2312-8372.2018.146126

Issue

Section

Technology and System of Power Supply: Original Research