Adaptation of world experience of crisis management in Ukraine

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/2312-8372.2015.38718

Keywords:

anti-crisis management, public anti-crisis management, crisis, bankruptcy of enterprise, anti-crisis measures

Abstract

The forms of anti-crisis management in countries with developed market economics are revealed in the article. In most countries it is realized through legislation improvement in the field of employment, increase the number of jobs, especially for young people, coordinating the efforts of various government departments to develop and conduct of economic policy through increase a state intervention in the economy.

It is established that in direction of anti-crisis management in Europe prevails selective approach aimed at stimulation of specific companies; priorities of state sector in Scandinavia are education, health care, pension and labor market. In addition, in some countries to find innovative structures of enterprises, increase their competitiveness and efficiency of recovery used developing programs of privatization that have their own characteristics in each country.

The generalization of the world experience of solving the problems of bankruptcy of enterprises made it possible to distinguish two approaches to this problem. The first is a liquidation of the company, the second is the reorganization. It should be emphasized on dominance of the second approach.

Worldwide anti-crisis management models provide different potential for progressive social and economic progress. Usage of positive experience should be the first step in reforming the system of anti-crisis management.

Author Biographies

Валентина Валентинівна Храпкіна, Makiyivka Institute of Economics and Humanities

Doctor of Economics, Professor

Department of finance

Олена Петрівна Чучко, Makiyivka Institute of Economics and Humanities

Candidate of Economic Sciences, Associate Professor

Department of finance

References

  1. Krivov, V. D. (2002). Zakonodatel'noe regulirovanie makroekonomicheskih protsessov v SShA. Analiticheskii vestnik Soveta Federatsii FS RF, 3 (159), 18. – Available: http://www.budgetrf.ru/Publications/Magazines/VestnikSF/2002/vestniksf159-03/vestniksf159-03030.htm
  2. In: Korotkov, E. M. (2001). Antikrizisnoe upravlenie. M.: INFRA-M, 432.
  3. European Financial Stability and Integration. (2012, April). Report 2011. Available: http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/economic_analysis/docs/financial_integration_reports/20120426-efsir_en.pdf
  4. Deineka, O. V. (2009). Vzaiemozviazok masshtabiv ta efektyvnosti funktsionuvannia derzhavnoho sektoru ekonomiky. Aktualni problemy ekonomiky, 9 (99), 58-64.
  5. Treaty establishing the European stability mechanism. (2012). Available: http://www.efsf.europa.eu/attachments/esm_treaty_en.pdf
  6. Prodius, I. P., Doroshuk, A. A. (2003). Formirovanie strategii predotvrashcheniia bankrotstva na predpriiatii. Odesa: Iz-vo Odesskogo iuridicheskogo instituta NUVD, 136.
  7. Rodionova, N. V. (2002). Antikrizisnyi menedzhment. M.: IuNITI-DANA, 223.
  8. Pink, F.; Translation from English: Tarasenko, O. H. (2000). Profesiia fakhivtsia z pytan bankrutstva ta zakonodavstvo u Velykobrytanii. K.: Presa Ukrainy, 117–131.
  9. Borovski, M., Kiunlents, A. (2009). Nad Ukrainoiu navyslo bankrutstvo. Inozemna presa pro Ukrainu, 15, 20.
  10. Tsar, O. (2013). Svitovyi dosvid ozdorovlennia neplatospromozhnykh pidpryiemstv ta mozhlyvosti yoho zastosuvannia v Ukraini. Halytskyi ekonomichnyi visnyk, 2 (41), 34-42.
  11. Biriukov, O. M. (2008). Transkordonni bankrutstva: problemy i shliakhy rozviazannia. K.: Vyd-vo vydavnycho-polihrafichnyi tsentr Kyivskyi universytet, 318.
  12. Anishchenko, L. O. (2012). Zarubizhnyi dosvid antykryzovoho upravlinnia. Ekonomichnyi prostiriu, 68, 143-156.

Published

2015-01-29

How to Cite

Храпкіна, В. В., & Чучко, О. П. (2015). Adaptation of world experience of crisis management in Ukraine. Technology Audit and Production Reserves, 1(7(21), 42–49. https://doi.org/10.15587/2312-8372.2015.38718