Methodological and instrumental tools of generation of strategies of knowledge-intensive high-tech industries

Authors

  • Юрий Александрович Романенков Zhukovsky National Aerospace University "Kharkiv Aviation Institute", Chkalovа str., 17, Kharkiv, Ukraine, 61070, Ukraine
  • Василий Михайлович Вартанян Zhukovsky National Aerospace University "Kharkiv Aviation Institute", Chkalovа str., 17, Kharkiv, Ukraine, 61070, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9428-2763
  • Юрий Леонидович Прончаков Zhukovsky National Aerospace University "Kharkiv Aviation Institute", Chkalovа str., 17, Kharkiv, Ukraine, 61070, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0027-1452
  • Теймур Гидаятович Зейниев Zhukovsky National Aerospace University "Kharkiv Aviation Institute", Chkalovа str., 17, Kharkiv, Ukraine, 61070, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8418-7818

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/2312-8372.2015.47910

Keywords:

strategy of production development, modeling tools of business processes

Abstract

An approach to the problem of decomposition of decision support for strategic management of the development of knowledge-intensive high-tech industries is proposed in the article. The subject of the research is methodological tools and generates strategies for the development of knowledge-intensive high-tech industries. Complexity and specificity of the strategy development are analyzed. A scheme for generating strategies for the development of knowledge-intensive high-tech industries is considered, as well as the matrix model of the relative effectiveness level assessment of a hierarchical system of business processes in the organization is considered. It is used the original tool of normalized charts as graphic-analytical tools for analysis of the relative effectiveness of substrategies of organization. It is developed optimization mechanism for selecting strategies to improve the competitiveness of the organization, ensuring optimal allocation of resources between the volumes of measures to improve the efficiency of certain business processes in the organization. Algorithmic and software tools for modeling business processes in functionality are systematized.

Author Biographies

Юрий Александрович Романенков, Zhukovsky National Aerospace University "Kharkiv Aviation Institute", Chkalovа str., 17, Kharkiv, Ukraine, 61070

Candidate of Technical Sciences, Associate Professor, Doctoral Student

Department of Economics and Marketing

Василий Михайлович Вартанян, Zhukovsky National Aerospace University "Kharkiv Aviation Institute", Chkalovа str., 17, Kharkiv, Ukraine, 61070

Doctor of Technical Sciences, Professor, Head of Department

Department of Economics and Marketing

Юрий Леонидович Прончаков, Zhukovsky National Aerospace University "Kharkiv Aviation Institute", Chkalovа str., 17, Kharkiv, Ukraine, 61070

Candidate of Technical Sciences, Associate Professor

Теймур Гидаятович Зейниев, Zhukovsky National Aerospace University "Kharkiv Aviation Institute", Chkalovа str., 17, Kharkiv, Ukraine, 61070

Lead Engineer

Department of Economics and Marketing

References

  1. Gruzinov, V. P., Astaf'eva, I. A. (2012). Effektivnost' upravleniia promyshlennymi predpriiatiiami: teoreticheskii aspekt. Zhurnal avtomobil'nyh inzhenerov, 1 (72). Available: http://www.aae-press.ru/f/72/44.pdf
  2. Velihanova, A. R. (2008). Osnovnye printsipy i zadachi effektivnogo upravleniia predpriiatiem v problemnoi srede. Transportnoe delo Rossii, 3, 30.
  3. Kovalishina, G. V. (2002). Sistemnyi podhod v otsenke effektivnosti upravleniia firmoi. Audit i finansovyi analiz, 2. Available: http://www.auditfin.com/fin/2002/2/rkovalishina/rkovalishina.asp
  4. Pastuhova, V. V. (2000). Ispol'zovanie SWOT-analiza v protsesse vybora global'noi strategii predpriiatiia. Donetsk: AOOT Donetskii Torgovyi Dom «Donbass», 74.
  5. Gaponenko, A. L., Pankruhin, A. P. (2010). Strategicheskoe upravlenie. M.: Omega-L, 472.
  6. Vartanian, V. M., Steliuk, B. B., Golovanova, M. A., Dronova, I. V. (2009). Modeli, metody i instrumental'nye sredstva podderzhki priniatiia reshenii v naukoemkom vysokotehnologicheskom proizvodstve. H.: ID «INZhEK», 224.
  7. Romanenkov, Yu. A., Vartanian, V. M., Zeiniev, T. G. (2014). Optimizatsionnyi mehanizm vybora strategii po-vysheniia konkurentosposobnosti organizatsii. Radioelektronnye i komp'iuternye sistemy, 4 (68), 150–156.
  8. Pokropivnij, S. F. (2002). Ekonomika predpriiatiia. K.: KNEU, 605.
  9. Zueva, A. G., Noskov, B. V., Sidorenko, E. V., Vsiakih, E. I., Kiselev, S. P.; In: Tresko, I. A. (2008). Praktika i problematika modelirovaniia biznes protsessov. M.: DMK Press; Kompaniia AiTi, 246.
  10. Alad'ev, V. Z., Boiko, V. K., Rovba, E. A. (2011). Programmirovanie v paketah Maple i Mathematica: Sravnitel'nyi aspekt. Belarus': Grodno, Grodnenskii gosudarstvennyi universitet, 517.
  11. Plehanov, A. V. (2010). Matematiko-statisticheskie metody obrabotki informatsii s primeneniem programmy SPSS. SPb.: SPbGUEF, 96.
  12. Kul'tin, N. B. (2009). Instrumenty upravleniia proektami: Project Expert i Microsoft Project. SPb.: BHV-Peterburg, 160.
  13. Sravnitel'nyi analiz programm dlia biznes-modelirovaniia. Available: http://bigc.ru/instruments/compare/
  14. Cheremnyh, S. V. Semenov, I. O., Ruchkin,B. C. (2006). Modelirovanie i analiz sistem. IDEF-tehnologii. M.: Finansy i statistika, 192.

Published

2015-07-23

How to Cite

Романенков, Ю. А., Вартанян, В. М., Прончаков, Ю. Л., & Зейниев, Т. Г. (2015). Methodological and instrumental tools of generation of strategies of knowledge-intensive high-tech industries. Technology Audit and Production Reserves, 4(2(24), 40–44. https://doi.org/10.15587/2312-8372.2015.47910

Issue

Section

Information Technologies: Original Research