Model the effectiveness of a systematic process of technical re-equipment of production

Authors

  • Дар’я Валеріївна Безугла National Technical University of Ukraine «Kharkiv Polytechnic Institute», 21, Frunze str., Kharkiv, Ukraine, 61002, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9558-5026

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/2312-8372.2015.52101

Keywords:

enterprise, model of efficiency, functional components, technical re-equipment, the system function

Abstract

In the article the modern definition of "technical re-equipment of production", outlines the methodological approach to the analysis of its nature and content, as a system process efficiency is determined by performing technical-technological, organizational-economic and innovation-implementing subsystems consisting of technical object retooling.

Developed the optimization  mathematical of model system function efficiency of technical industry re-equipment aimed to the combination consisting of generalized analytical performance ratio of all nominated subsystems defined functional and technical components. Essential author's suggestion is calculating a priori and actual performance across all functional components of technical upgrading facility, comparison of achieved performance and efficiency and using of partial indices composed of system function performance. The possibility of interpreting the indicators of efficiency of the system function is not only to assess the outcomes of technical re-equipment of production, but also to identify the functional components of the overall system, which targets technical upgrading achieved with deviations from planned values.

Proposed author deals with both scientific-methodological significance and practical orientation that tested by the example of a concrete manufacturing plant and can be implemented in other enterprises industries.

Author Biography

Дар’я Валеріївна Безугла, National Technical University of Ukraine «Kharkiv Polytechnic Institute», 21, Frunze str., Kharkiv, Ukraine, 61002

PhD student

Department of production organization and personnel management

References

  1. In: Goncharov, V. V. (1992). Adaptatsiya promyshlennyh predpriyatiy k nauchno-tehnicheskim novshestvam. Kyiv: Tehnika, 132.
  2. Pererva, P. G., Zhegys, O. V. (2011). Naykovo-innovatsiyniy potentsial Ukrayini ta sychasni problemi yogo vikoristannya. Available: http://archive.nbuv.gov.ua/portal/Natural/vcpi/TPtEV/2011_26/statiya/Pererva.pdf
  3. In: Pererva, P. G., Mehovich, S. A., Pogorelov, M. I. (2008). Ekonomika ta organizatsiya innovatsiynoyi diyalnosti. Kharkiv: NTU «KhPI», 1080.
  4. Pererva, P. G., Mehovich, S. A., Pogorelov, M. I. (2008). Organizatsiya ta ypravlinnya innovatsiynoyu diyalnistyu. Kharkiv: NTU «KhPI», 1025.
  5. Grabchenko, A. I., Pererva, P. G., Smolovik, R. F. (1999). Osnovy marketinga vysokih tehnologiy. Kharkiv: KhGPU, 242.
  6. Larina, K. V. (2008). Upravlinnya tehnichnim pereozbroennyam pidpriemstva na osnovi kontseptsiyi marketingu. Kharkiv, 24.
  7. Melkumov, Ya. S. (2002). Organizatsiya i finansirovanie investitsiy: ucheb.posobie. Moscow: INFRA, 248.
  8. Pererva, P. G., Tovazhnyanskiy, V. L. (2010). Antikrizoviy monitoring finansovo-ekonomichnih pokaznikiv roboti mashinobydivnogo pidpriemstva. Ekonomika rozvitky, 2 (54), 46–50.
  9. Pererva, P. G., Tkachova, N. P. (2011). Rozvitok metodiv analizy faktichnogo stany konkyrentnih perevag pidpriemstva. Ekonomika rozvitky, 4 (60), 116–120.
  10. Pererva, P. G., Kotsiski, D., Sakay, D., Vereshne Shomoshi, M. (2012). Transfer tehnologiy. Kharkiv: Virovets A. P. «Apostrof», 668.
  11. Pererva, P. G., Kosenko, A. V., Kosenko, O. P. (2012). Antikrizovi instrymenti stalogo rozvitky pidpriemstva: innovatsiyna, investitsiyna ta marketingova politika. Available: http://www.nbuv.gov.ua/portal/natural/vcpi/TPtEV/2012_25 /statti/16Pererv.pdf.
  12. Samochkin, V. V. (2000). Gibkoe razvitie predpriyatiya: Analiz i planirovanie. Moscow: Delo, 376.
  13. Sapozhnikov, E. O. (2005). Innovatsiyni problemi tehnichnogo pereozbroennya virobnitstva. Kharkiv: KhNU im. Karazina, 260.
  14. Dhaoui, M. L. (2003). Metodological guide: restructuring, upgrading and industrial competitiveness. Vienna: UNIDO, 87.
  15. Narayanan, V. (2001). Managing Technology and Innovation for Competitive Advantage. UK: Prentice Hall, 168.
  16. Pererva, P. G., Gladenko, I. V. (2010). Monitoring innovatsiynoyi diyalnosti: interpretatsiya rezyltativ. Marketing i menedzhment innovatsiy, 2, 108–116.
  17. Drucker, P. (2007). Innovation and Entrepreneurship. UK: HarperBusiness, 288. doi:10.4324/9780080549415
  18. Pererva, P. G. (2003). Samomarketing menedzhera i biznesmena. Rostov-on-Don: Feniks, 592.
  19. Bezugla, D. V. (2013). Organizatsiyno-ekonomichni aspekti innovatsiynoyi diyalnosti pidpriemstv Harkivskoyi oblasti. Visnik Natsionalnogo tehnichnogo universitetu «KhPI». Seriya: Tehnichniy progres i efektivnist virobnitstva, 20 (993), 112–120.
  20. Pererva, P. G., Tkachova, N. P. (2011). Sinergetichniy efekt benchmarkingy konkyrentnih perevag. Marketing i menedzhment innovatsiy, 4 (1), 55–66.

Published

2015-09-22

How to Cite

Безугла, Д. В. (2015). Model the effectiveness of a systematic process of technical re-equipment of production. Technology Audit and Production Reserves, 5(5(25), 25–31. https://doi.org/10.15587/2312-8372.2015.52101