The experience of agri-food market regulation in the European Union under globalization

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/2312-8372.2015.52118

Keywords:

regulation, agricultural policy, industry, agri-food market, pork market, globalization, European Union

Abstract

The paper examines the approaches to the agri-food market regulation in the EU using innovative, scientifically based resource allocation rules. The fundamental principles of the agri-food market regulation in the EU in the context of binding regulations, directives and decisions were investigated. It was concluded that the measures of regulation of the agri-food market, including domestic pork market, competitiveness support of domestic production need substantial revision. Therefore, an attempt to prove the feasibility of the agri-food market regulation, which is based on respect for the fundamental principles of food law with the established procedures, which should be consistent with the production standards of domestic and imported goods was made.

The aforesaid will promote the application of experience of the EU member states in the area of agri-food market regulation by public application authorities, particularly in the issues of:

a) regulation of speculative foreign competition, manifested through subsidized imports and dumped prices;

b) acceleration of the implementation of the EU legislation in Ukraine;

c) feasibility of dual agri-food market regulation as horizontal at the level of regulations and vertical at the level of directives.

Author Biographies

Natalia Vdovenko, National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine, Heroes of Defense Street, 10, Кyiv, Ukraine, 03041

Doctor of Economic Sciences, Associate Professor, Head of the Department

Department of Global Economy

Vladimir Shepelev, National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine, Heroes of Defense Street, 10, Кyiv, Ukraine, 03041

Applicant

Department of Global Economy

References

  1. Heiets, V. M., Kyzym, M. O., Klebanova, T. S., Cherniak, O. I. et al.; In: Heiets, V. M. (2006). Modeliuvannia ekonomichnoi bezpeky: derzhava, rehion, pidpryiemstvo. Kharkiv: INZhEK, 240.
  2. Shkolnyi, O. O. (2013). Metodolohichni aspekty doslidzhennia svitovoho rynku ahroprodovolchoi produktsii. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats Umanskoho natsionalnoho universytetu sadivnytstva, Vol. 82, 191–197. Available: http://nbuv.gov.ua/j-pdf/zhpumus_2013_82_34.pdf
  3. Ostashko, T. O., Voloshchenko, L. Yu., Lienivova, H. V.; In: Tochylin, V. O. (2010). Vnutrishnii ahroprodovolchyi rynok Ukrainy v umovakh SOT. Kyiv, 208.
  4. Pavlenko, O. M. (2009). Shchodo perspektyv ahroprodovolchoho vyrobnytstva v umovakh formuvannia zony vilnoi torhivli Ukraina – YeS. Visnyk ahrarnoi nauky, 4, 71–74.
  5. Khorunzhyi, M. Y. (2002). Rozrobka ahrarno-prodovolchoi doktryny Ukrainy – imperatyv chasu. Osnovni napriamy vysokoefektyvnoho rozvytku poreformenoho ahropromyslovoho vyrobnytstva v Ukraini na innovatsiinii osnovi. Kyiv: IAE UAAN, 214–220.
  6. Sabluk, P. T., Kaletnik, H. M., Kvasha, S. M., Vlasov, V. I., Lysak, M. A. (2011). Natsionalna doktryna prodovolchoi bezpeky v Ukraini. Ekonomika APK, 8, 3–12.
  7. Kvasha, S. M., Kvasha, K. S. (2013). Stan ta tendentsii rozvytku silskoho hospodarstva krain-chleniv Yevropeiskoho Soiuzu. Kyiv: NNTs IAE, 40.
  8. Hnatiuk, S. A. (2015). Rezultaty i perspektyvy roboty hospodarstv korporatsii «Tvarynprom». Visnyk ahrarnoi nauky Prychornomoria, Vol. 2, № 4, 15–22.
  9. Kvasha, S. M. (2011). Napriamy udoskonalennia mekhanizmiv formuvannia rynkovoi rivnovahy na rynkakh silskohospodarskoi produktsii. Ekonomika APK, 2, 161–167.
  10. Kuzhel, V. V., Soltyk, Ya. V. (2012). Teoretychni zasady modernizatsii ahrarnoi ekonomiky. Vektor nauki TGU. Seriia: Ekonomika i upravlenie, 4 (10), 83–87.
  11. Mohylnyi, O. M. (2004). Spilna ahrarna polityka Yevropeiskoho soiuzu shchodo staloho silskoho rozvytku: uroky dlia Ukrainy. Ekonomika APK, 7, 3–4.
  12. Begemann, F., Ehling, C., Falge, R. (1996). Haltung und Erhaltung tiergenetischer Ressourcen in Ex-situ-Haltung in Zoos und Tierparks. Schriften zu genetischen Ressourcen, 60–77.
  13. Kotler, P. (1991). Marketing Management: Analysis, Planning, Implementation and Control. Prentise-Hall, 686.
  14. Burakovsky, I., Movchan, V., O'Keefe, T. A., Ulgen, S., Shnyrkov, O. (2012). The impact of an FTA between Ukraine and the EU. Oxford Economics, 138.
  15. Ivaniuta, V. F., Beidyk, N. M. (2008). Stan i problemy vyrobnytstva produktsii svynarstva Ukraini. Ahrosvit, 10, 25–27.
  16. Antoniuk, P. O. (2002). Zberezhennia eksportnoho prodovolchoho potentsialu Ukrainy. Ekonomika APK, 1, 110–113.
  17. Kravchenko, O. I., Hetia, A. A. (2012). Rynok svynyny – suchasni vymohy klasyfikatsii tush. Prybutkove svynarstvo, 5 (11), 34–42.
  18. Derevyankin, T., Kostiushko, O. (2003).Vitchyzniana ekonomichna dumka pro derzhavu i suspilni instytuty v systemi rynkovoho hospodarstva na rubezhi ХІХ-ХХ st. EkonomikaUkrainy, 11, 74–79.
  19. Kuzubov, M. V. (2002). Analiz i otsinka sytuatsii na rynku ahroprodovolchykh tovariv. Ekonomika APK, 6, 88–92.
  20. Kravchenko, R. G. (1978). Matematicheskoe modelirovanie ekonomicheskih protsessov v sel'skom hoziaistve. Moscow: Agropromizdat, 428.
  21. Kostner, U.; In: Nivievskyi, O. (2012). Osnovy analizu ahrarnoho rynku. Kyiv: ADEF-Ukraina, 486.

Downloads

Published

2015-09-22

How to Cite

Vdovenko, N., & Shepelev, V. (2015). The experience of agri-food market regulation in the European Union under globalization. Technology Audit and Production Reserves, 5(5(25), 65–70. https://doi.org/10.15587/2312-8372.2015.52118

Issue

Vol. 5 No. 5(25) (2015): Economics and management of enterprise. Development of the productive forces and regional economy. Economic cybernetics

Section

Problems of Macroeconomics and Socio-Economic Development: Original Research

License

Copyright (c) 2016 Natalia Vdovenko, Vladimir Shepelev

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The consolidation and conditions for the transfer of copyright (identification of authorship) is carried out in the License Agreement. In particular, the authors reserve the right to the authorship of their manuscript and transfer the first publication of this work to the journal under the terms of the Creative Commons CC BY license. At the same time, they have the right to conclude on their own additional agreements concerning the non-exclusive distribution of the work in the form in which it was published by this journal, but provided that the link to the first publication of the article in this journal is preserved.