Improvement of scientific conceptual paradigms of market development in conditions of economic globalization

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/2312-8372.2017.98401

Keywords:

intersectoral scientific relations, conceptual model, globalization of the economy, the market environment factors

Abstract

The article is devoted to scientific and conceptual models that describe the current market conditions.

Object of research is a global market environment, the conceptual gist of market, relationships in a market system. Market development in a globalizing economy is multilevel and multivector. The essence of the concept of «market» gets new content in a globalized economy. Elucidation of the new characteristics of the market needs to identify new features of national markets.

The methodological approach of research is being based on dialectical approach to the formation of new market paradigms and building of the conceptual models. Deduction method is being used also in the study, which is to interchange from the general to the conceptual models of partial elements of these models. Monographic method is being used to compile scientific experience. Methods of comparison, analysis and synthesis are being used to form the authors’ models.

Conceptual approaches to the interpretation of the category of «market» have been received and further developed. Treatment of this category has been improved, which, unlike existing, is signifying a system of economic relations between market actors on buying and selling market objects in a defined territory for a certain period of time provided free opportunistic pricing, limited government regulation, freedom of choice and free disposal traded under limited resources under the influence of economic globalization. Conceptual model of intersectoral scientific relations to category «market» has been built. Four basic approaches (political, administrative, marketing, logistics and approach in terms of intellectual property and business) have been used for building this model. The differences between the definition «international», «world», «global», «foreign trade» has been justified. The model of the structure of the market environment factors has been constructed.

Author Biography

Iuliia Samoilyk, Poltava State Agrarian Academy, 1/3, Scovorody str., Poltava, Ukraine, 36003

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Economic of Enterprise

References

  1. Dolan, E. G., Lindsey, D. E. (1994). Microeconomics. Dryden Press, 500.
  2. McConnell, C. R., Brue, S. L., Flynn, S. M. (2011). Economics: Principles, Problems and Policies. Ed. 19. McGraw-Hill Education, 896.
  3. Marshall, A. (2015). Principles of Economics. Arkose Press, 866.
  4. In: Bashnianin, G. I. (2013). Ekonomicheskie sistemy. Vol. 4. Lvov: Liga-Press, 508.
  5. Baturina, M., Lukov, V. (2005). Rynok: sutnist, osnovni poniattia i struktura. Kyiv, 384.
  6. Biletska, L. V., Biletskyi, O. V., Savych, V. I. (2009). Ekonomichna teoriia (Politekonomiia. Mikroekonmoika, Makroekonomika). Ed. 2. Kyiv: Tsentr uchbovoi literatury, 688.
  7. Esposo Guerrero, B. J. (2010). Politics, Globalization, and Food Crisis Discourse. Economics Discussion Papers, 22, 17. doi:10.2139/ssrn.1726779
  8. Castells, M. (1999). The Information Age, Volumes 1-3: Economy, Society and Culture. Wiley-Blackwel, 1488.
  9. Federico, G. (2011). How much do we know about market integration in Europe? The Economic History Review, 65 (2), 470–497. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0289.2011.00608.x
  10. Fernandez, F. J., Blanco, M. (2015). Modelling the Economic Impacts of Climate Change on Global and European Agriculture. Review of Economic Structural Approaches. Economics: The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal, 9, 1–53. doi:10.5018/economics-ejournal.ja.2015-10
  11. Mbekeani, K. K. (2010). Infrastructure, Trade Expansion and Regional Integration: Global Experience and Lessons for Africa. Journal of African Economies, 19 (Supplement 1), 88–113. doi:10.1093/jae/ejp021
  12. Samoilyk, Iu. V. (2012). Metodychni pidkhody do otsinky stratehichnoho potentsialu konkurentospromozhnosti pidpryiemstva. Ekonomika APK, 3, 72–78.
  13. Van Putten, I. E., Kulmala, S., Thébaud, O., Dowling, N., Hamon, K. G., Hutton, T., Pascoe, S. (2011). Theories and behavioural drivers underlying fleet dynamics models. Fish and Fisheries, 13 (2), 216–235. doi:10.1111/j.1467-2979.2011.00430.x
  14. Wier, M., O’Doherty Jensen, K., Andersen, L. M., Millock, K. (2008). The character of demand in mature organic food markets: Great Britain and Denmark compared. Food Policy, 33 (5), 406–421. doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2008.01.002
  15. Nikolenko, Yu. V. (2003). Osnovy ekonomichnoi teorii. Kyiv: TsUL, 540. Available: http://www.ebk.net.ua/Book/OsnEkTeor/Oet06-09/5601.htm
  16. Kayryak, O., Gamuga, O. (2012). World Market. Ekonomichni nauky. Ser.: Oblik i finansy, 9 (2), 9–13.
  17. Boblovskyi, O. (2012). Trans-cultural Interaction in the Terms of Globalization. Visnyk Kharkivskoho natsionalnoho universytetu imeni V. N. Karazina. Seriia: Teoriia kultury i filosofiia nauky, 995, 49–53.
  18. Maistro, S. V., Maistro, R. H. (2009). Osoblyvosti rozvytku natsionalnoi ekonomiky v umovakh hlobalizatsii. Visnyk NTU «KhPI»: Tekhnichnyi prohres ta efektyvnist vyrobnytstva, 36 (1), 76–82.
  19. Miazina, N. B. (2010). Dotsilnist sehmentuvannia hlobalnoho rynku silskohospodarskoi produktsii. Formuvannia rynkovoi ekonomiky, 24, 336–344.
  20. Grygorjev, O. Yu., Bojar, V. V., Malakhova, I. V. (2013). Global economy and Ukraine. Visnyk Natsionalnoho universytetu «Lvivska politekhnika». Menedzhment ta pidpryiemnytstvo v Ukraini: etapy stanovlennia i problemy rozvytku, 776, 364–369.
  21. Inozemtsev, M. M. (2016). The competitiveness of crop production and its ecological and economic support. Rozvytok yevropeiskoho prostoru ochyma molodi: ekonomichni, sotsialni ta pravovi aspekty: materialy Vseukr. nauk.-prakt. konf. molodykh uchenykh ta studentiv, 22 kvitnia 2016 roku. Kharkiv: NTMT, 533–537.

Downloads

Published

2017-03-30

How to Cite

Samoilyk, I. (2017). Improvement of scientific conceptual paradigms of market development in conditions of economic globalization. Technology Audit and Production Reserves, 2(5(34), 60–65. https://doi.org/10.15587/2312-8372.2017.98401

Issue

Vol. 2 No. 5(34) (2017): Macroeconomics

Section

Problems of Macroeconomics and Socio-Economic Development: Original Research

License

Copyright (c) 2017 Iuliia Samoilyk

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The consolidation and conditions for the transfer of copyright (identification of authorship) is carried out in the License Agreement. In particular, the authors reserve the right to the authorship of their manuscript and transfer the first publication of this work to the journal under the terms of the Creative Commons CC BY license. At the same time, they have the right to conclude on their own additional agreements concerning the non-exclusive distribution of the work in the form in which it was published by this journal, but provided that the link to the first publication of the article in this journal is preserved.