BIO-ORIENTATION OF HERPETOBIONS UNDER THE EFFECT OF GROUND HERBICIDES

Authors

  • С. О. Мазур Institute of Agroecology and Nature Management of NAAS, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33730/2310-4678.4.2018.166434

Keywords:

herpes botanical insects, agricultural landscaping, biodiversity, ecotone, entomocomplex

Abstract

One of the directions of modern biomonitoring of agroecosystems is the search for new approaches
and certain biomarkers for the state of the ecosystem and the individual populations that are part of it.
The viability of populations, as an integral indicator of their state, is a reliable biomarker, which gives an
idea of the future fate of the population and the species as a whole. In addition, viability as a quantitative
indicator of the survival rate of the population appears reflexive norms of the corresponding reactions
of the organism to changes in the environment.
The impact of various chemicals caused by human activity at the population level and biocenosis, as
well as the tolerance tolerance for all types and ecosystems, are not well-known and studied, therefore deep
research is needed to assess the impact and provide a fundamental effective monitoring of the quality of
the environment.
The integral indices of the herpesbiont groupings under conditions of use of soil herbicides are shown
and their application creates selective conditions and leads to a decrease in the number of species of different
taxonomic groups. It has been established that entomocomplexes of field ecosystems loaded with
soil herbicides are characterized by a depleted level of species diversity, polydominance and leveling in
numbers, compared to natural habitats.

Author Biography

С. О. Мазур, Institute of Agroecology and Nature Management of NAAS

researcher

References

Zlotin, A.Z., Markina, T.Iu. & Isichenko, N.V. (2014). Novye podkhody k monitoringu sostoianiia populiatcii nasekomykh v ekosistemakh [ New approaches to monitoring the state of insect populations in ecosystems]. Ukraїnskii entomologіchnii zhurnal. [Ukrainian Entomological Journal], 1 (8), 63–68. (In Ukr.)

Chernikov, V.A. & Cherkes, A.I. (2000). Agroekologiia [Agroecology]. M.: Kolos (In Ukr.)

Lobkov, V.T. (1999). Bioraznoobrazie v agroekosistemakh kak faktor optimizatcii biologicheskoi aktivnosti pochvy [Biodiversity in agro ecosystems as a factor for optimizing the biological activity of the soil]. Pochvovedenie [Soil science], 6, 732–737. (In Ukr.)

Puchkov, O.V. (2009). Zhuky-saprofahy (Insecta: Coleoptera) Ahrotsenoziv Ukrainy [Beetroot saprophagy (Insecta: Coleoptera) Agrocenoziv Ukraine]. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats Kharkivskoho natsionalnoho pedahohichnoho universytetu imeni H.S. Skovorody [Collection of scientific works of Kharkiv National Pedagogical University named after GS Pans], 11, 81–88. (In Ukr.)

Siutkina, N.H. & Lisovyi, M.M. (2013) Suchasnyi stan entomofauny herpetobiontiv v ahrolandshaftakh tsentralnoho Lisostepu [The current state of the entropy of herpetobionts in the agrolandscapes of the central forest-steppe]. Visnyk ahrarnoi nauky [Bulletin of Agrarian Science], 11, 31–33. (In Ukr.)

Lisovyi M.M., Borzykh O.I. & Vahaliuk L.V. (2015). Metodolohiia otsiniuvannia suchasnoho stanu riznomanittia entomofauny ahrolandshaftiv Ukrainy [Methodology for assessing the state of entomophage diversity of agrolandscapes of Ukraine]. Ahroekolohichnyi zhurnal [Agroecological journal], 2, 94–99. (In Ukr.)

Lisovyi, M.M., Siutkina, N.H. & Vahaliuk, L.V. (2014). Chyselnist dominuiuchykh vydiv entomofauny herpetobiontiv u ahrotsenozakh Lisostepu [The number of dominant species of entropophane herpetobionts in the agroenoses of the forest-steppe]. Ahroekolohichnyi zhurnal [Agroecological journal], 1, 43–48. (In Ukr.)

Stark, J.D., Vargas, R. & Banks, J.E. (2007). Incorporating ecologically relevant measures of pesticide effect for estimating the compatibility of pesticides and biocontrol agents. Econ Entomol, 100, 1027– 1032.

Antwi, F.B.. & Peterson, R.K.D. (2009). Toxicity of d-phenothrin and resmethrin to non-target insects. Pest Manag Sci, 65, 300–305.

James, D.G. (2003). Synthetic herbivore-induced plant volatiles as field attractants for beneficial insects. Environ Entomol, 32, 977–982.

Biddinger, D.J., Weber, D.C. & Hull, L.A. (2009). Coccinellidae as predators of mites: stethorini in biological control. Biol Control, 51, 268–282.

Hodek, I. & Honek, A. (2009). Scale insects, psyllids, and whiteflies (Hemiptera: Sternorrhyncha) as prey of ladybirds. Biol Control, 51, 232–243.

O’Connell, D.M., Wratten, S.D., Pugh, A.R. & Barnes, A.M. (2012). New species association’ biological control? Two coccinellid species and an invasive psyllid pest in New Zealand. Biol Control, 62, 86–92.

Fazil Hasan & Mohd Shafiq Ansari (2016). Ecotoxicological hazards of herbicides on biological attributes of Zygogramma bicolorata Pallister (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Chemosphere, 154, 398–407.

Yemelianov, I.H., Zahorodniuk, I.V. & Khomenko, V.M. (1999). Taksonomichna struktura i skladnist biotychnykh uhrupovan [Taxonomic structure and complexity of biotic groups]. Ecology and Noospherology, 8, 4, 6–17.

Rozenberg, G.S. (2007). Neskolko slov ob indekse raznoobraziia Simpsona [A few words about the Simpson diversity index]. Samarskaia Luka. [Samarskaya Luka], 16, 3 (21), 581–584.

Published

2019-05-16

Issue

Section

PROTECTION OF ENVIRONMENT