INTRODUCTION OF AGRICULTURAL LANDSCAPE IN ECONOMIC CIRCUMSTANCES IS ONE OF THE KEY PROBLEMS OF MODERN MARKET LAND RELATIONS IN UKRAINE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33730/2310-4678.4.2018.166435Keywords:
turnover, land turnover, moratorium, land reform, formation, land structure, land-resource potential, land market, development, institutional preconditions.Abstract
The essence of economic land turnover in agriculture and its constituents is theoretically substantiated,
discussion provisions on the scientific principles of turnover and circulation of agricultural lands
are highlighted, the necessity of lifting the moratorium on the free circulation of agricultural land is
determined in stages. The institutional preconditions of improvement of land relations in Ukraine are
substantiated. The essence of turnover and circulation of agricultural lands is revealed. In order to create
measures for recreation of land resource potential and stimulation of ecologically safe and balanced
land use, the financial and economic mechanism of land relations regulation is proposed, which envisages
strengthening of the targeted direction of financial resources accumulated on the basis of fiscal land
tenure regulators, such as revenues into special funds of recreated land resources potential through land
payment, environmental tax, fines for deteriorating land quality. It is alleged that the land market is an
area of exchange where the main commodity is the land. This market regulates redistribution of land and
rights to its ownership among landowners, as well as all factors related to production should operate in one
generally recognized market environment. The importance of stopping excessive concentration of land in
agroholdings is substantiated, and provision of opportunities for farmers, as promising economic entities,
to freely dispose of agricultural land. It is proved the importance of introducing agricultural land into
economic turnover, which will open important prospects for land management of lands and rural areas to
limit the deterioration of the state and productivity of land-resource potential and the priority provision
of socio-economic development of rural areas and village recovery.
References
Berlach, A.I. (1999). Orhanizatsijno-pravovi problemy stanovlennia orendnykh zemel’nykh vidnosyn v Ukraini: istoriia i suchasnist’ [Organizational-legal problems of the formation of lease land relations in Ukraine: history and modern times]. Pravo Ukrainy [The law of Ukraine], 2, 15–18. (In Ukr.)
Berlach, A.I. (1999). Orenda zemli iak shliakh do ii rynku [Renting land as a way to its market]. Predprinimatel’stvo, kh-vo i pravo [Entrepreneurship, economy and law], 4, 45–48. (In Rus.)
Bilyk, Yu.D. (2000). Formuvannia rynku sil’s’kohospodars’kykh zemel’ i pidvyschennia efektyvnosti ikh vykorystannia [Formation of the agricultural land market and increase the efficiency of their use]. Zemlevporyadnyy visnyk [Land Bulletin], 2, 24–28. (In Ukr.)
Boyko, A.L. (1990). Ekolohyya vyrusov rastenyy [Ecology of plant viruses]. Kyiv: Vyshcha shkola. 167. (In Rus.)
Busel, V.T., Vasyleha-Derybas, M.D. & Dmytriyeva, O.V. (2001). Velykyy tlumachnyy slovnyk suchasnoyi ukrayins’koyi movy [Great explanatory dictionary of modern Ukrainian language]. Irpin’: VTF Perun. 1440. (In Ukr.)
Hayduts’kyy P.I., Stel’mashchuk A.M. (1994). Zemlya: vlasnist’, orenda, renta [Land: property, lease, rent]. Kyiv: Urozhay. 184.
Heyets’ V.M. (2009). Suspil’stvo, derzhava, ekonomika: fenomenolohiya vzayemodiyi ta rozvytku [Society, state, economics: phenomenology of interaction and development]. Kyiv: Instytut ekonomiky ta prohnozuvannya NAN Ukrayiny. 864. (In Ukr.)
Hnatkovych, D.I. & Hnatkovych O.D. (1998). Rynok zemli i yoho marketynhove obsluhovuvannya [Land market and its marketing service]. Visnyk L’vivs’koho ahrarnoho universytetu [Visnyk of Lviv Agrarian University], 1, 102–106. (In Ukr.)
Holyan, V., Petrukha, S. & Zablivs’kyy, A. (2017). Zemel’na reforma v Ukrayini: Priorytety ta instytutsiyni peredumovy pohlyblennya [Land reform in Ukraine: Priorities and institutional prerequisites for deepening]. Ekonomist [Economist], 8, 8–17. (In Ukr.)
Dobryak, D.S. Martyn, A.H. & Palamarchuk, L.V. (2006). Aktual’ni problemy zakonodavchoho zabezpechennya rozvytku rynku zemel’ v Ukrayini [Actual problems of legislative provision of land market development in Ukraine]. Zemleustriy i kadastr [Land management and cadastre], 1, 3–7. (In Ukr.)
Dobryak, D.S. Tykhonov, A.H. & Palamarchuk, L.V. (2004). Ekonomichnyy oborot zemli v Ukrayini: teoriya, metodolohiya i praktyka [Economic Turnover of Land in Ukraine: Theory, Methodology and Practice]. Kyiv: Urozhay, 136. (In Ukr.)
Dobryak, D.S. & Shkuratov, O.I. (2018). Formuvannya i rozvytok rynkovykh zemel’nykh vidnosyn na terenakh Ukrayiny [Formation and development of market land relations in Ukraine]. Zbalansovane pryrodokorystuvannya [Balanced Nature Using], 1, 8–17. (In Ukr.)
Zemel’nyy kodeks Ukrayiny [Land Code of Ukraine]: 25 zhovtnya 2001 roku №2768-III // Vidom. Verkhov. Rady Ukrayiny (VVR). 2002, 3–4, 27. (In Ukr.)
Krylatykh, E.M. (1997). Stanovlennya i rozvytok systemy rehulyuvannya zemel’nykh vidnosyn [Formation and development of the system of regulation of land relations]. Problemy prohnozuvannya [Problems of Forecasting], 1, 35. (In Ukr.)
Lupenko YU.O. (2002). Ekonomichni peredumovy stanovlennya rynku sil’s’kohospodars’kykh zemel’ [Economic preconditions for the formation of the agricultural land market]. Rynok zemli [The land market], 3, 41–44. (In Ukr.)
Malik, M.Y. & Valentynov, V.L. (2002). Metodolohichni aspekty vklyuchennya zemli v hospodars’kyy oborot [Methodological aspects of inclusion of land in economic turnover]. Ekonomika APK [The Economy of Agro-Industrial Complex], 4, 29–34. (In Ukr.)
Martyn, A.H. (2011). Rehulyuvannya rynku zemli v Ukrayini [Martyn A.H. Rehulyuvannya rynku zemli v Ukrayini]. Kyiv Ahrar. Media hrup, 254. (In Ukr.)
Martyn, A. & Horbatovych, S. (2006). Moratoriy na prodazh zemel’ sil’s’kohospodars’koho pryznachennya: naslidky ta perspektyvy [Moratorium on the sale of agricultural land: implications and prospects]. Zemlevporyadnyy visnyk [Land Bulletin], 2, 58–60. (In Ukr.)
Moskalenko, A. (2001). Evolyutsiya orendnoho zemlekorystuvannya: zarubizhnyy ta vitchyznyanyy dosvid [Evolution of leased land use: foreign and domestic experience]. Ekonomika Ukrayiny [Economy of Ukraine], 12, 47–51. (In Ukr.)
Paskhaver, B.Y. (1997). Pytannya formuvannya rynku zemli v Ukrayini [Issues of formation of the land market in Ukraine]. Visnyk ahrarnoyi nauky [Bulletin of Agrarian Science], 5, 62–67. (In Ukr.)
Fedorov, M.M. (2003). Orhanizatsiyno-ekonomichni peredumovy formuvannya rynku zemel’ sil’s’kohospodars’koho pryznachennya [Organizational and economic prerequisites for the formation of the market of agricultural land]. Ekonomika APK [The Economy of Agro-Industrial Complex], 1, 25–31. (In Ukr.)
Yurchenko, I.V. (2013). Teoretychni zasady obihu zemel’ u sil’s’komu hospodarstvi [Theoretical principles of land use management in agriculture] Zemleustriy i kadastr [Land management and cadastre], 1, 68–71. (In Ukr.) 71.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
- The authors reserve the right to authorship their work and pass the journal the right to publish this work under a Creative Commons Attribution License license, which allows other persons to freely distribute the published work with the obligatory The authors of the original work and the first publication of this magazine.
- The authors have the right to make independent additional agreements on the nonexclusive dissemination of the work in the form in which it was published by this magazine (for example, to post work in the company's electronic storage or to publish as a monograph) , subject to the first publication of the link to this journal.
- Journal policy allows and encourages the placement of authors on the Internet (for example, in the repositories of institutions or on personal websites) manuscript work as to the presentation of this manuscript to the editorial board and during its editorial processing, as it contributes to The productive scientific discussion and positively affects the efficiency and dynamics of citation published work (see The Effect of Open Access).
