Foreign experience in managing natural park areas

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33730/2310-4678.3.2023.289321

Keywords:

nature reserve fund, recreation, national natural parks, sustainable development, environment, management activity

Abstract

Although the importance of preserving the environment and encouraging public recreation in national parks is widely recognized, challenges to achieving these goals remain. With over a century of national park management experience, the institutional knowledge of national park systems in the European Union and the United States can offer valuable insights into best management practices. Effective and sustainable management of a national park requires an organizational structure at the state level with respect for local institutions at the park level, involvement of stakeholders in park management decisions, public involvement encouraged by information sharing and education, clarity of boundaries, improved relations with landowners of adjacent lands, and give priority to improving relations with the indigenous population. It has been determined that better park management relies on education to increase public awareness of the importance of national parks and park systems. Tourism and climate change were identified as creating increasing challenges for park management, underscoring the shared urgency of addressing these challenges. The foreign experience on the example of the European Union and the United States of America regarding the management of the territories of natural parks is studied. Three methods of using information on management efficiency are characterized: programming, which includes identifying problems and setting priorities; adaptive management, which is based on the use of performance data for the purpose of continuous improvement of management processes; accountability, which means providing reports and answers about activities and performance. It has been proven that in modern times, due to restrictions established by legislation, the territories of national parks in Ukraine do not have wide access for organized mass tourism and recreation.

Author Biographies

N. Popadynets, Institute of Entrepreneurship and Advanced Technologies of the Lviv Polytechnic National University

Doctor of Economic Sciences, Senior Researcher

O. Hrafska, Lviv State University of Physical Culture n.a. Ivan Bobersky

Doctor of Economic Sciences

O. Halachenko, Vinnytsia Institute of Interregional Academy of Personnel Management

Doctor of Economic Sciences

References

Hazuda, M.V., & Diachenko, I.B. (2014). Rehionalnyi menedzhment zberezhennia i vidtvorennia pryrodnozapovidnykh terytorii: monohrafiia [Regional management of conservation and restoration of natural reserve territories: monograph]. Uzhhorod: Vydavnytstvo FOP Breza A. E [in Ukrainian].

Zhuk, P. (2023). Terytorialnyi rozvytok, pryrodne dovkillia, ekonomika: naukovi rozvidky: monohrafiia [Territorial development, natural environment, economics: scientific researches: monograph]. DU “Instytut rehionalnykh doslidzhen imeni M. I. Dolishnoho NAN Ukrainy” [in Ukrainian].

Drebot, O.I. (2011). Systema derzhavnoho upravlinnia pryrodno-zapovidnym fondom Ukrainy ta yii rehioniv[The system of state management of the nature reserve fund of Ukraine and its regions]. Rehionalna ekonomika — Regional economy, 4, 205–209 [in Ukrainian].

Shershun, M. Kh., Kasiukhnych, V.Yu. (2023). Ekonomichna skladova rozvytku lisovoi haluzi v umovakh voiennoho stanu [Economic component of the forest industry development under martial law]. Zbalansovane pryrodokorystuvannia — Balanced environmental management, 1, 45–52 [in Ukrainian].

Tretiak, V.M., Yurchenko, A.D., & Lobunko, Yu.V. (2015). Problemy udoskonalennia instytutsionalnoi bazy upravlinnia pryrodno-zapovidnym fondom Ukrainy [ Problems of improving the institutional framework for managing the nature reserve fund of Ukraine]. Zemleustrii, kadastr i monitorynh zemel — Land management, cadastre and land monitoring, 1, 65–73[in Ukrainian].

Kosheliuk, T.V. (2020). Instytutsiina systema upravlinnia natsionalnymy pryrodnymy parkamy v Ukraini [Institutional system of management of national natural parks in Ukraine]. Aktualni problemy vdoskonalennia chynnoho zakonodavstva Ukrainy — Actual problems of improving the current legislation of Ukraine, 54, 74–89 [in Ukrainian].

Hammer, T., Bär, R., Ehrensperger, A., Friedli, A., Liechti, K., Wallner, A., & Xenia Wiesli, T. (2022). A holistic assessment of the impacts of park management: findings from the evaluation of Regional Nature Parks in Switzerland. Journal on protected mountain areas research, 14 (1), 14–24. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1553/eco.mont-14-1s14 [in English].

Oberdorfer, R. (2001). National Park Management — A study of US National Parks with particular emphasis on sustainable tourism. URL: https://www.grin.com/document/317 [in English].

Ferretti-Gallon, K., Griggs, E., Shrestha, A., & Wang, G. (2021). National parks best practices: Lessons from a centurys worth of national parks management. International Journal of Geoheritage and Parks, 335–346. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgeop.2021.05.004 [in English].

Pro pryrodno-zapovidnyi fond Ukrainy: Zakon Ukrainy vid 16.06.1992 № 2456-XII [On the Nature Reserve Fund of Ukraine: Law of Ukraine dated June 16, 1992, no. 2456-XII]. (1992). URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2456-12#Text [in Ukrainian].

Halachenko, O.O. (2017). Rehionalna polityka rozvytku sanatorno-kurortnykh posluh: dosvid ta praktyka [Regional policy of development of sanatorium and resort services: experience and practice]. Economic development of the state and its social stability′ 17: Materialy Mizhnarodnoi naukovo-praktychnoi Internetkonferentsii — Materials of the International Scientific and Practical. Internet conference (pp. 71–73). Poltava [in Ukrainian].

Published

2023-06-28

Issue

Section

Articles