A mechanism for involving the public in monitoring the activities of local self-government bodies

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33730/2310-4678.4.2023.292711

Keywords:

public monitoring, administrative services, territorial communities, information collection

Abstract

On the basis of the conducted research, the essence of the concept of public monitoring is defined. The main purpose of public monitoring is outlined. The main stages of public monitoring are highlighted. It is determined that the most important stage of monitoring is the collection of information. The quality of monitoring in general depends on how complete, reliable, and impartial the information collected is. It is proved that the implementation of monitoring results in the activities of a local government body requires an established feedback mechanism. Therefore, it is necessary to diversify the forms and methods of feedback to the public and ensure their wider implementation. In particular, at the level of information, cooperation should be carried out through websites, mass media, public events, public hearings, announcements and banners, maximizing the potential of social networks. It is determined that public involvement in controlling the provision of administrative services has a number of positive results. The incentives and obstacles to the involvement of citizens in local self-government are outlined.

References

Azhazha, M.A. (2012). Monitorynh yak instrument zabezpechennia yakosti derzhavnykh ta munitsypalnykh posluh [Monitoring as a tool to ensure the quality of public and municipal services]. Humanitarnyi visnyk ZDIA — Humanitarian Bulletin of ZSEA, 50, 270–277 [in Ukrainian].

Dashchakivska, O. (2012). Osoblyvosti monitorynhu orhaniv mistsevoho samovriaduvannia yak metodu vyvchennia politychnoho protsesu [Peculiarities of monitoring local governments as a method of studying the political process]. Visnyk Lvivskoho universytetu: Seriia “Filosofsko-politolohichni studii” — Bulletin of Lviv University: Series “Philosophical and Political Studies”, 2, 181–191 [in Ukrainian].

Litvinov, O.V. (2014). Hromadskyi monitorynh protsesu stvorennia ta funktsionuvannia tsentriv nadannia administratyvnykh posluh v Ukraini [Public monitoring of the process of establishment and functioning of administrative service centers in Ukraine]. Aspekty publichnoho upravlinnia — Aspects of public administration, 3–4, 59–66. URL: http://nbuv.gov.ua/j-pdf/aplup_2014_3-4_10.pdf [in Ukrainian].

Chursin, V.P. (2011). Instytut hromadskykh inspektoriv yak orhanizatsiino-pravova forma zabezpechennia vidpovidalnosti orhaniv mistsevoho samovriaduvannia [Institute of Public Inspectors as an Organizational and Legal Form of Ensuring the Responsibility of Local Governments]. Publichne upravlinnia: teoriia i praktyka — Public Administration: Theory and Practice, 2 (6), 213–218 [in Ukrainian].

Krupnyk, A.S. Hromadskyi kontrol: sutnist ta mekhanizmy zdiisnennia [Public control: essence and mechanisms of implementation]. URL: http://novyi-stryi.at.ua/gromkontrol/KRUPNYKA _pro_grom_kontrol.pdf [in Ukrainian].

Zharaia, S.B. (2013). Kontseptsiia administratyvnykh posluh ta mizhnarodna praktyka upravlinnia yakistiu nadannia posluh. [The concept of administrative business is an international practice for the management of the quality of business]. Naukovyi visnyk Akademii munitsypalnoho upravlinnia. Seriia “Upravlinnia” — Scientific Bulletin of the Academy of Municipal Management. Series “Management”, 2, 28–35 [in Ukrainian].

Hromadianske suspilstvo i vlada [Civil society and the government]. (n.d.). URL: https://www.kmu.gov.ua/gromadskosti/gromadyanske-suspilstvo-i-vlada [in Ukrainian].

Mistsevi initsiatyvy ta zaluchennia hromadskosti do zdiisnennia mistsevoho samovriaduvannia: navchalnyi posibnyk dlia posadovykh osib mistsevoho samovriaduvannia [Local initiatives and public involvement in local self-government: Training manual for local self-government officials]. (2015). K.: VI EN AY ENTERPRISE LLC [in Ukrainian].

Vzaiemodiia orhaniv mistsevoho samovriaduvannia z hromadskistiu: stan, perspektyvy, rekomendatsii ta praktyky: analitychnyi zvit [Interaction of Local Governments with the Public: Status, Prospects, Recommendations and Practices: analytical report]. (2014). K.: AMU [in Ukrainian].

Karyi, O. (2006). Hromada i vlada: uchast hromadskosti u mistsevomu samovriaduvanni. Spivpratsia zi ZMI. Navch. posib. [Community and government: public participation in local government: Cooperation with mass media. Education manual]. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].

Published

2023-10-25

Issue

Section

Articles