Environmental risks due to the impact of pesticide load in agrocenoses of cereal crop predecessors

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33730/2310-4678.4.2023.292726

Keywords:

agroecotoxicological index, degree of danger of pesticides, agricultural crops, crop rotation, minimization of ecological risk, management of environmental risks

Abstract

The article is dedicated to the study of the impact of pesticide load on agrocenoses of cereal crop predecessors and the emergence of ecological risks in them. An assessment of ecological risks in the agrocenoses of the experimental field of the State Enterprise “Research Farm “Skvyrske” of IAEM of NAAS” was carried out using pesticides during the growing seasons 2021–2023. The methodology for assessing ecological risks of potential pesticide pollution of agrocenoses by indicators of agroecotoxicological index (AETI) was used. It was determined that the level of ecological risk from pesticide pressure in the crop rotation of the experimental field by AETI is within the range from 2.86·10–3 to 2.24·10–1 сonventional units and is characterized as slightly dangerous, which indicates a minimal ecological risk of pesticide use. The obtained results are a sign that the load of applied pesticides on the agrocenoses of the experimental farm corresponds to the territory’s ability to self-clean. It is shown that rational use of chemical methods of plant protection in combating pests, disease pathogens and weeds creates prerequisites for obtaining environmentally safe grain and seed products, as well as minimizes the likelihood of environmental of grain and seed contamination with pesticides of cultivated crops. Usually, longterm and repeated use of pesticides in any case leads to accumulation of their residues or metabolites in the soil and, as a result, is a source of contamination of crop products and environmental objects. Therefore, using the results of assessing pesticide load on agroecosystems, taking into account the territory’s ability to self-clean, can be considered as one of the levers for managing environmental risks. To minimize ecological risks from pesticide pollution of agrocenoses and increase environmental safety of agroecosystems, measures should be taken to regulate the use of chemical plant protection products. This should be done by banning or restricting the use of pesticides that have a high level of ecotoxicity and are persistent in soil.

References

Palapa, N.V., & Honchar, S.M. (2022). Ekolohichni ryzyky, poviazani iz silskohospodarskoiu diialnistiu liudyny [Ecological risks associated with human agricultural activity]. Ahroekolohichnyi zhurnal — Agroecological journal, 1, 68–80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33730/2077-4893.1.2022.255189 [in Ukrainian].

Sydorchuk, P.S. (2022). Ekolohichni ryzyky ta naslidky zastosuvannia pestytsydiv [Ecological risks and consequences of pesticide use]. Multidisciplinary academic notes. Theory, methodology and practice: The XXVII International Scientific and Practical Conference (July 12–15, 2022, Prague, Czech Republic), (p. 60–62) [in Ukrainian].

Accastello, C., Blanc, S., & Brun, F. (2019). A framework for the integration of nature-based solutions into environmental risk management strategies. Sustainability, 11 (2), 489. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su11020489 [in English].

Nazaruk, M.M., & Bota, O.V. (2020). Doslidzhennia ekolohichnykh ryzykiv yak kliuchovyi element otsinky vplyvu na dovkillia [Environmental risk research as a key element of environmental impact assessment]. Liudyna ta dovkillia. Problemy neoekolohii — Man and environment. Problems of neoecology, 34, 100–107. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26565/1992-4224-2020-34-10 [in Ukrainian].

Keruvannia ryzykom. Metody zahalnoho otsiniuvannia ryzyku [Risk management. General risk assessment methods]. (2015). DSTU IEC/ISO 31010:2013 from 2013-12-11. Kyiv: Ministry of Economic Development of Ukraine [in Ukrainian].

Azarov, S.I., Sydorenko, V.L., & Zadunai, O.S. (2018). Problemy analizu ryzyku proiavlennia nebezpechnykh protsesiv ta otsinka ekonomichnoho zbytku v mezhakh selbyshchnoi terytorii [Problems of risk analysis of dangerous processes and assessment of economic damage within the agricultural territory]. Matematychne modeliuvannia v ekonomitsi — Mathematical modeling in economics, 2, 84–92. URL: http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/handle/123456789/162035 [in Ukrainian].

Lysychenko, H.V., Khmil, H.A., Barbashev, S.V., Zabulonov, Yu.L., & Tyshchenko, Yu.E. (2014). Ekolohichnyi ryzyk: metodolohiia otsiniuvannia ta upravlinnia: Navchalnyi posibnyk [Environmental Risk: Assessment and Management Methodology: A Study Guide]. Kyiv: Naukova dumka [in Ukrainian].

Furdychko, O.I., & Shkuratov, O.I. (2016). Stratehichne upravlinnia ekolohichnoiu bezpekoiu v ahrarnomu sektori [Strategic management of environmental security in the agricultural sector]. AhroSvit — AgroSvit, 8, 3–8 [in Ukrainian].

Mazur, V.A., Tkachuk, O.P., & Yakovets, L.A. (2020). Ekolohichna bezpeka zernovoi ta zernobobovoi produktsii: monohrafiia [Environmental safety of grain and leguminous products: monograph]. Vinnytsia: Tvory [in Ukrainian].

Bezpechnist promyslovykh pidpryiemstv. Terminy ta vyznachennia [Safety of industrial enterprises. Terms and definitions]. (1993). DSTU 2156-93 from 1995-01-01. Kyiv: Derzhavnyi standart Ukrainy. URL: https://dnaop.com/html/41018/doc-ДСТУ_2156-93 [in Ukrainian].

Suter II, G.W. (2016). Ecological risk assessment. CRC Press is an imprint of Taylor & Francis Group, LCC [in English].

Marambe, B., & Wijesundara, S. (2021). Effects of climate change on weeds and invasive alien plants in Sri Lankan agro-ecosystems: policy and management implications. Frontiers in Agronomy, 3 (36), 641006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fagro.2021.641006 [in English].

Moklyachuk, L.I., Lishchuk, A.M., Draga, M.V., Horodyska, I.M., Plaksyuk, L.B., & Ternovy, Yu.V. (2020). Perekhid vid tradytsiinoi do ekobezpechnoi orhanichnoi systemy zemlerobstva v umovakh zmin klimatu: vyklyky ta shliakhy vyrishennia [Transition from traditional to eco-friendly organic farming system in the conditions of climate change: challenges and solutions]. Zbalansovane pryrodokorystuvannia — Balanced nature using, 2, 100–109. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33730/2310-4678.2.2020.208819 [in Ukrainian].

Lishchuk, A.M., Parfenyuk, A.I., Horodyska, I.M., Borodai, V.V., & Draga, M.V. (2022). Osnovni vazheli upravlinnia ekolohichnymy ryzykamy v ahrotsenozakh [The main levers of environmental risk management in agrocenoses]. Ahroekolohichnyi zhurnal — Agroecological journal, 2, 74–85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33730/2077-4893.2.2022.263320 [in Ukrainian].

Monarch, V.V. (2014). Otsinka ekolohichnykh ryzykiv zabrudnennia pestytsydamy komponentiv ahroekosystemy [Assessment of ecological risks of pesticide contamination of components of the agroecosystem]. Zbalansovane pryrodokorystuvannia — Balanced nature using, 1, 206–212 [in Ukrainian].

Voitsitskyi, V.M., Khyzhniak,S.V., Danchuk, V.V., Midyk, S.V., Hryshchuk, I.A., Ushkalov, V.O. (2020). Ekolohichni ryzyky: pryroda i kryterii [Environmental risks: nature and criteria]. Naukovo-praktychnyi zhurnal: Ekolohichni nauky — Scientific and practical journal: Ecological sciences, 4 (31), 131–135. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32846/2306-9716/2020.eco.4-31.21 [in Ukrainian].

Tokhtar, K.I., Havryliuk, Yu.V. Chy mozhlyve bezpechne vykorystannia pestytsydiv? [Is it possible to use pesticides safely?]. (2020). Ahrokhimiia i gruntoznavstvo: mizhvid. tem. nauk. Zbirnyk Agrochemistry and soil science: interdepartmental thematic scientific collection, 90, 76–85. Kharkiv: NSC “IGA named after O.N. Sokolovsky”. URI: http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/8221 [in Ukrainian].

Yakovets, L.A. (2020). Ekotoksykolohichna otsinka zernovoi produktsii ahrotsenoziv za vmistom zalyshkiv pestytsydiv v umovakh Lisostepu Pravoberezhnoho [Ecotoxicological assessment of grain products of agrocenoses according to the content of pesticide residues in the conditions of the Pravoberezhny Forest Steppe]. Silske hospodarstvo ta lisivnytstvo — Agriculture and forestry, 16, 226–237. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37128/2707-5826-2020-1-16 [in Ukrainian].

Martiianova, Yu.V., & Korshun, M.M. (2021). Prohnozuvannia stupeniu nebezpechnosti zabrudnennia gruntu, pidzemnykh ta poverkhnevykh vododzherel pestytsydamy riznykh khimichnykh klasiv zalezhno vid gruntovo-klimatychnykh umov [Forecasting the degree of contamination of soil, underground and surface water sources by pesticides of different chemical classes depending on soil and climatic conditions]. Ukrainskyi naukovyi medychnyi molodizhnyi zhurnal — Ukrainian scientific medical youth journal, 124(2), 77–88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32345/USMYJ.2(124).2021.77-88 [in Ukrainian].

Korshun, M.M., Martiianova, Yu.V., & Korshun, O.M. (2022). Hihiienichna otsinka translokatsii novykh pestytsydiv u systemi “grunt — roslyna” [Hygienic evaluation of the translocation of new pesticides in the “soil — plant” system]. Visnyk medychnykh i biolohichnykh doslidzhen — Herald of medical and biological research, 4, 28–34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11603/bmbr.2706-6290.2022.4.13261 [in Ukrainian].

Korshun, M.M., Martіianova, Yu.V., & Hhorbachevskyi, R.V. (2023). Hihiienichna otsinka mihratsii novykh pestytsydiv iz gruntu v nyzhni shary atmosfernoho povitria [Hygienic assessment of new pesticides migration from soil into the lower atmospheric air layer]. Dopovidi Vinnytskoho natsionalnoho medychnoho universytetu — Reports of Vinnytsia National Medical University, 27 (1), 144–149. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31393/reports-vnmedical-2023-27(1)-26 [in Ukrainian].

Tsytsiura, Ya.H., Shkatula, Yu.M., Zabarna, T.A., & Pelekh, L.V. (2022). Innovatsiini pidkhody do fitoremediatsii ta fitorekultyvatsii u suchasnykh systemakh zemlerobstva [Innovative approaches to phytoremediation and phytoremediation in modern farming systems]. Vinnytsia: TOV “Druk” [in Ukrainian].

Monaci, E., Polverigiani, S., Neri, D., Bianchelli, M., Santilocchi, R., Toderi, M.,... & Vischetti, C. (2017). Effect of contrasting crop rotation systems on soil chemical and biochemical properties and plant root growth in organic farming: First results. Italian Journal of Agronomy, 12 (4), 364–374. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4081/ija.2017.831 [in English].

Bublyk, L.I. (2007). Ekotoksykolohichnyi ryzyk zastosuvannia khimichnykh zasobiv zakhystu roslyn vid shkidlyvykh orhanizmiv (laboratorii analitychnoi khimii pestytsydiv 50 rokiv) [Ecotoxicological risk of using chemical plant protection agents against harmful organisms (laboratories of analytical chemistry of pesticides for 50 years)]. Zakhyst i karantyn roslyn — Protection and quarantine of plants, 53, 271–281 [in Ukrainian].

Markov I.L. (2017). Khvoroby hrechky ta zakhody shchodo obmezhennia yikh shkodochynnosti [Buckwheat diseases and measures to limit their harmfulness]. Ahronom — Agronomist. URL: https://www.agronom.com.ua/hvoroby-grechky-ta-zahody-shhodo-obmezhennya-yih-shkodochynnosti/ [in Ukrainian].

Derzhavnyi reiestr pestytsydiv i ahrokhimikativ, dozvolenykh do vykorystannia v Ukraini [State register of pesticides and agrochemicals approved for use in Ukraine]. URL: https://mepr.gov.ua/upravlinnyavidhodamy/derzhavnyj-reyestr-pestytsydiv-i-agrohimikativ-dozvolenyh-do-vykorystannya-v-ukrayini/[in Ukrainian].

Ivanyshyn, V.V., Shuvar, I.A., Havrylianchyk, R.Yu., Sendetskyi, V.M., Bunchak, O.M., & Tymofiichuk, O.B. (2016). Tekhnolohiia vyroshchuvannia hrechky v promizhnykh posivakh [Buckwheat cultivation technology in intercropping]. Zb. nauk. prats Podilskoho DATU — Collection of scientific papers of the Podilsk DATU, 24 (1), 93–100 [in Ukrainian].

Tanchyk, S.P., Pavlov, O.S., & Chumbei, V.V. (2020). Potentsiina zaburianenist gruntu zalezhno vid yoho obrobitku za vyroshchuvannia hrechky posivnoi v Prykarpatti Ukrainy [Potential weediness of the soil depending on its cultivation for the cultivation of seed buckwheat in the Carpathian region of Ukraine]. Naukovi dopovidi NUBiP Ukrainy — Scientific reports of NUBiP of Ukraine, 1 (83). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31548/dopovidi2020.01.006 [in Ukrainian].

Markov, I.L. (2018). Khvoroby vivsa: osoblyvosti zbudnykiv ta zakhody z obmezhennia yikh poshyrennia [Oat diseases: characteristics of pathogens and measures to limit their spread]. Ahronom — Agronomist. URL: https://www.agronom.com.ua/hvoroby-vivsa-osoblyvosti-zbudnykiv-ta-zahody-z-obmezhennya-yihposhyrennya/ [in Ukrainian].

Gorash, A., Armonienė, R., Mitchell Fetch, J., Liatukas, Ž., & Danytė, V. (2017). Aspects in oat breeding: nutrition quality, nakedness and disease resistance, challenges and perspectives. Annals of Applied Biology, 171 (3), 281–302 [in English].

Bublyk, L.I., Vasechko, G.I., Vasiliev, V.P., Lisovuy M.P. (Ed.). (1999). Dovidnyk iz zakhystu roslyn [Plant Protection Handbook]. Kyiv: Urozhai [in Ukrainian].

Downloads

Published

2023-10-25

Issue

No. 4 (2023)

Section

Articles

License

  1. The authors reserve the right to authorship their work and pass the journal the right to publish this work under a Creative Commons Attribution License license, which allows other persons to freely distribute the published work with the obligatory The authors of the original work and the first publication of this magazine.
  2. The authors have the right to make independent additional agreements on the nonexclusive dissemination of the work in the form in which it was published by this magazine (for example, to post work in the company's electronic storage or to publish as a monograph) , subject to the first publication of the link to this journal.
  3. Journal policy allows and encourages the placement of authors on the Internet (for example, in the repositories of institutions or on personal websites) manuscript work as to the presentation of this manuscript to the editorial board and during its editorial processing, as it contributes to The productive scientific discussion and positively affects the efficiency and dynamics of citation published work (see The Effect of Open Access).