Deformational regimes and kinematic conditions of modern tectonic faulting within the limits of the Mountain Crimea. 2
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24028/gzh.0203-3100.v37i1.2015.111328Keywords:
tectonic faulting formation, strain fields, deformation regimes, kinematic conditions, stereographic models, faulting, displacements, thrust-faultsAbstract
Description and analysis of stereographic models of deformational regimes of tectonic faulting and corresponding kinematic conditions given in part 1 [Wolfman, 2014] have been continued. Models and examples of manifestations of fault, uplift and uplift-fault deformational regimes have been given. Naturally determined order of strain field orientations has been substantiated, which specified the processes of tectonic faulting in the Mountain Crimea area, inversion mode of kinematic conditions manifestation, special features of transformation of structure forming strain fields and accordingly deformational regimes as well as the role of tectonic faults of those or other structural-kinematic types (including blanket-thrust faults) in the structure of the region. Necessity has been shown to introduce some corrections to problems definition, methodology and interpretation of results of tectonic studies being conducted.
References
Borisenko L. S., 1983. Faults of the Crimean Mountains. Geologicheskiy zhurnal (2), 126—129 (in Russian).
Borisenko L. S., Plakhotnyy L. G., 1997. Geodynamics Crimean Black Sea region as a consequence of the multilevel orogeny. In: Geodynamics Crimean Black Sea region. Simferopol: Institute of Geophysics NASU, Crimean advisory council, 54—64 (in Russian).
Volfman Yu. M., 2014. Deformation modes and kinematic conditions recent tectonic faulting within the Crimean Mountains. 1. Geofizicheskiy zhurnal 36 (6), 93—112 (in Russian).
Volfman Yu. M., 2008. On the influence of kinematic environments on cyclicity of geological processes within the Crimea and Northern Black Sea during the Alpine stage. Geofizicheskiy zhurnal 30 (5), 101—114 (in Russian).
Volfman Yu. M., 2013 a. Reflection different ranks voltage systems and their transformations in the processes seismotectogenesis. Geodinamіka (2), 31—33 (in Russian).
Volfman Yu. M., 2013 б. Structural and kinematic identification of seismogenic zones of the Zagros (according to the decisions of earthquake focal mechanisms). Geofizicheskiy zhurnal 35 (2), 38—64 (in Russian).
Volfman Yu. M., Gintov O. B., Kolesnikova E. Ya, Lazarenko O. E., Ostanin A. M., 2006. Structural and tectonophysical aspects of the decision of some controversial issues of Geodynamics of the Crimean Mountains. Geofizicheskiy zhurnal 28 (2), 23—38 (in Russian).
Volfman Yu. M., Gintov O. B., Ostanin A. M., Kolesnikova E. Ya., Murovskaya A. V., 2008. On the role of structural and kinematic identification of tectonic faults in the formation of the structure and geodynamics of the Crimean region. Geofizicheskiy zhurnal 30 (1), 49—61 (in Russian).
Gazli earthquakes in 1976 and 1984. Ed. G. A, Mavlyanova. Tashkent: Fan, 1986. 368 p.
Gintov O. B., 2001. Planetary crustal deformation, rotation of the Earth and the movement of lithospheric plates. Geofizicheskiy zhurnal 23 (4), 69—82 (in Russian).
Gintov O. B., 2005. Field tectonophysics and its application in the study of crustal deformation in Ukraine. Kiev: Feniks, 572 p. (in Russian).
Gintov O. B., Isay V. M., 1988. Tectonophysical study faults crust. Kiev: Naukova Dumka, 228 p. (in Russian).
Gintov O. B., Korchemagin V. A., Sim L. A., 2002. Ukrainian Carpathians and the Crimean Mountains — similarities and differences between the kinematic characteristics of tectonic movements (tectonophysical analysis). Geofizicheskiy zhurnal 24 (6), 75—92 (in Russian).
Gonchar V. V., Patalakha E. I., Gintov O. B., 2004. Models stretching and Prirazlomnoe inclusion in paleotectonic reconstruction of the Crimean Mountains. Dopovidi NAN Ukrainy (6), 112—118 (in Russian).
Gushchenko O. I., 1979. Method of kinematic analysis of the structures of destruction in the reconstruction of tectonic stress fields. In: Stress and strain fields in the lithosphere. Moscow: Nauka, 7—25 (in Russian).
Gushchenko O. I., Mostryukov A. O., Petrov V. A., 1991. Structure of the field of contemporary regional stress seismically active zones of crustal eastern Mediterranean active zone. Doklady AN SSSR 312 (4), 830—835 (in Russian).
State geological map of Ukraine, 2005. Scale 1 : 200 000. The Crimea series. Sheets L-36-XXVIII (Evpatoria), L-36-XXXIV (Sevastopol). Explanatory note. Typesetters B. P. Chaykovsky, S. V. Beletsky, V. B. Deev, O. S. Demyan, S. I. Krasnorudska. Simferopol: Min. Environmental Protection of Ukraine, State Geological Service, the State enterprise «Pivdenekoheotsentr», 383 p. (in Ukrainian).
State geological map of Ukraine, 2006. Scale 1 : 200 000. The Crimea series. Sheets L-36-XXIX (Simferopol), XXXV (Yalta). Explanatory note. Typesetters L. Fikolina, A. Bilokrys, N. Obsharska, S. Krasnorudska. Simferopol: Min. Environmental Protection of Ukraine, State Geological Service, the State enterprise «Pivdenekoheotsentr», 380 p. (in Ukrainian).
Kazantsev Yu. V., 1982. Tectonics Crimea. Moscow: Nauka, 112 p. (in Russian).
Lobatskaya R. M., 1983. Rank classification of faults. Izvestiya VUZov. Geologiya i razvedka (6), 11—18 (in Russian).
Murovskaya A. V., 2011. Stress-strain state of West Mountain Crimea in Oligocene—Holocene on tectonophysical data. Geofizicheskiy zhurnal 33 (6), 46—56 (in Russian).
Novik N. N., Volfman Yu. M., 1997. Evolution of planetary stress fields within seismically active regions of Ukraine, the latest breaks and discontinuous displacement. In: Geodynamics Crimean Black Sea region. Simferopol: Institute of Geophysics NASU, Crimean advisory council, 81—90 (in Russian).
Pivovarov S. V., Borisenko L. S., Chuba B. S., 1984. Geological map of the Crimean Mountains. 1 : 200 000. Kiev: Ministry of Geology of the USSR (in Russian).
Pustovitenko A. A., 2002. Catalog mechanisms (Crimea). In: Earthquakes of Northern Eurasia in 1996. Moscow: Nauka, P. 354 (in Russian).
Pustovitenko B. G., 1977. Tectonic stresses in the crust of the Crimean region according to the centers of small earthquakes. Geofizicheskiy sbornik AN USSR is. 78, 15—23 (in Russian).
Pustovitenko B. G., 2002. Focal mechanisms of earthquakes tangible Crimean Black Sea last 20 years. Proc.: Seismological Bulletin of Ukraine for 2000. Sevastopol: NPC «EKOSI-Gidrofizika», 59—64 (in Russian).
Tectonic map of Ukraine in scale 1 : 1 000 000, 2004. Eds D. S. Gursky, S. Kruglov. Kyiv: State. Geol. Service of Ukraine (in Ukrainian).
Sherman S. I., Boriyakov S. A., Buddo V. Yu., 1983. Dynamic region of influence razlomov. Novosibirsk: Nauka, 112 p. (in Russian).
Yudin V. V., 2011. Geodynamics Crimea. Simferopol: DIAYPI, 336 p. (in Russian).
Yudin V. V., Gerasimov M. E., 1997 a. Geodynamic models Crimean Black Sea and adjacent regions. In: Geodynamics of the Crimean Black Sea region. Simferopol: Institute of Geophysics, National Academy of Sciences, the Crimean Expert Council, 1997 a. 16—23. (in Russian).
Yudin V. V., Gerasimov M. E., 1997 b. Criticism of tectonic concepts of Crimea. In: Geodynamics of the Crimean Black Sea region. Simferopol: Institute of Geophysics, National Academy of Sciences, the Crimean Expert Council, 1997 b. 4—11. (in Russian).
Mann P., Hempton M. R., Bradley D. C., Burke K., 1982. Development of pull-apart basins. J. Geology 91, 529—554.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Geofizicheskiy Zhurnal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
