Internal structure and kinematics of the Zvenyhorod-Brats’k fault zone of the Ukrainian shield according to geophysical data
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24028/gj.v45i3.282413Keywords:
Zvenyhorod-Bratskfault zone, Ukrainian shield, magnetic anomalies and models, deep seismic sounding, structural textural elements of rocks, the stress fieldsAbstract
Complex geomagnetic and tectonophysical studies were performed in order to characterize in detail the heterogeneity of the Earth’s crust of the Zvenyhorod-Bratskfault zone and to clarify its internal structure and kinematics. Based on the results of magnetometric studies, maps of the different wavelength components of magnetic anomalies were obtained, the sources of which are associated with different layers of the crust; the magnetization of the upper, middle and lower parts of the crust was estimated; 2D and 3D magnetic models of individual structures and areas were developed; geological and tectonic interpretations were performed.
The Zvenyhorod-Bratskfault zone is clearly manifested in the regional component of the geomagnetic field, separating its maxima and minima zones, and is also reflected by linear anomalies and bands of the short-wavelength component of the upper part of the crustal section. At the same time, it separates areas of the Earth’s crust with fundamentally different types of sources and their magnetization values: in the west, linear sources of the upper and middle crust of the GSZ are characterized by significant magnetization (up to 3—6 A/m) in contrast to the oval-shaped sources of the Ingul block with magnetization up to 1 A/m m.
Tectonophysical measurements of structural and textural elements of rocks were carried out at four sites along the rivers Velyka Vys’, Kilten’, Suhyi Tashlyk and Mertvovid. Processing and interpretation of field measurements of structural textural elements of rocks were done by the structural-paragenetic method of tectonophysics for III-IV depth levels using the Stereonet program.
It was established that the Zvenyhorod-Bratskfault zone was formed ≤2.45 billion years ago and consists of rectilinear shear zones related to different stages of fault formation. However, the main factor in the formation of the fault zone is the Pervomaisk stage, during which the L-shears with a strike azimuth of 345° and R-shears with a strike azimuth of 357° were formed. The presence of Archean phases of shear in it can testify to the earlier formation of the Zvenyhorod-Bratskfault zone relative to the Pervomaysk one.
The Proterozoic cycle of activation (~2.1—1.70 billion years ago) contributed to the formation of deposits and ore manifestations of minerals within the Zvenyhorod-Bratskfaults zone.
References
Bakarjieva, M.I., & Orliuk, M.I. (2008). 3D numerical magnetic modeling of the structures Ingul Megablock of Ukrainian Shield, which are promising for kimberlite-lamproite magmatism. Proceeding of the scientific confer-ence «Geophysical technologies of geological media predicting and monitoring», Lviv, October 6—10, 2008 (pp. 153—154). Lviv: SPOLOM (in Ukrainian).
Gintov, O.B. (2005). Field tectonophysics and its application in the study of deformations of the Earth’s crust of Ukraine. Kiev: Feniks, 572 p. (in Russian).
Gintov, O.B. (2014). Scheme of periodization of faulting stages in the Earth’s crust of the Ukrainian shield — new data. Geofizicheskiy Zhurnal, 36(1), 3—18. https://doi.org/10.24028/gzh.0203-3100.v36i1.2014.116145 (in Russian).
Gintov, O.B., Entin, V.A., & Mychak, S.V. (2017). On plotting the scheme of fracture-mega-block tectonics of the Ukrainian Shield in a scale 1:500 000. Geofizicheskiy Zhurnal, 39(5), 63—82. https://doi.org/10.24028/gzh.0203-3100.v39i5. 2017.112340.
Gintov, O.B., Mychak, S.V. (2011а). Geodynamic development of the Ingul megablock of the Uk¬rainian Shield for geological-geophysical and tectonophysical data. I. Geofizicheskiy Zhur¬nal, 33(3), 102—118. https://doi.org/10. 24028/ gzh.0203-3100.v33i3.2011.116932 (in Rus¬sian).
Gintov, O.B., & Mychak, S.V. (2011б). Geodynamic development of the Ingul megablock of the Uk¬rainian Shield for geological-geophy¬sical and tectonophysical data. II. Geofizi¬ches¬kiy Zhurnal, 33(4), 89—99. https://doi.org/10.24028/gzh. 0203-3100.v33i4.2011.116898 (in Russian).
Gintov, O.B., & Mychak, S.V. (2011в). Stressed states and deformations of the earth’s crust of the central part of the Ingul megablock according to the materials of the tectonophysical study of the Novoukrainsky massif. Geofizicheskiy Zhurnal, 33(2), 28—45. https://doi.org/10.24028/gzh.0203-3100.v33i2.2011.117289 (in Russian).
Gintov, О.B., Orlyuk, M.I., Entin, V.A., Pashkevich, I.K., Mychak, S.V., Bakarzhieva, M.I., Shimkiv, L.M., & Marchenko, A.V. (2018). The structure of the Western and Central parts of the Uk¬rainian schield. Controversial issues. Geofi¬zi¬cheskiy Zhurnal, 40(6), 3—29. https://doi.org/ 10.24028/gzh.0203-3100.v40i6.2018.151000 (in Ukrainian).
Gintov, O.B., Pashkevich, I.K., & Mychak, S.V. (2013). Geodynamic evolution of the Ingul me¬ga¬block. In V.I. Starostenko, O.B. Gintov (Eds.), The Kirovograd ore area. Deep structure. Tectonophysical analysis. Ore deposits (pp. 278— 285). Kiev: Prastiye ludi (in Russian).
Gintov, O.B., & Shevchuk, V.V. (2017). Structurality of the Ukrainian shield and peculiarities of the Early Pre-cambrian faulting on the example of the Golovanіvsk suture zone. Kyiv: TOV «NVP Іnterservіs», 162 p. (in Ukrainian).
Shcherbak, N.P. (Ed.). (1993). Granitoids of the Ukrainian Shield. Petrochemistry, geochemistry, ore content. Di-rectory. Kiev: Naukova Dum¬ka, 231 p. (in Russian).
Ilchenko, T.V. (2003). Structure of the Earth’s crust and upper mantle of the Kirovohrad Block of the Ukrainian Shield according to the DSS data (Babanka—Pyatikhatka and Cherkasy—Novy Bug profiles). Geofizicheskiy Zhurnal, 25(6), 30—42 (in Russian).
Krutikhovskaya, Z.A., Pashkevich, I.K., & Silina, I.M. (1982). Magnetic model and the structure of the crust of the Ukrainian shield. Kiev: Naukova Dumka, 216 p. (in Russian)
Kryuchenko, V.A. (1987) Deep structure of the earth’s crust in the central part of the Ukrainian shield according to geophysical data and regularities in the distribution of uranium mineralization. Doctor's thesis. Kiev, 404 p. (in Russian).
Kryuchenko, V.A. (1989). Manifestation of protoactivation processes in the central part of the Ukrainian shield, according to geological and geophysical data. Geologicheskiy Zhurnal, (2), 23—29 (in Russian).
Kuprienko, P.Ya., Makarenko, I.B., Starostenko, V.I., & Legostaeva, O.V. (2007). Three-dimensional density model of the Earth’s crust and upper mantle of the Ingul megablock of the Ukrainian Shield. Geofizicheskiy Zhurnal, 29(2), 17—41 (in Russian).
Chekunov, A.V. (Ed.). (1989). Lithosphere of Central and Eastern Europe. East European Platform. Kyiiev: Nau-kova Dumka, 187 p. (in Russian).
Makarenko, I.B., Starostenko, V.I., Kuprienko, P.Ya., Savchenko, O.S., & Legostaeva, O.V. (2021). Heterogeneity of the Earth’s crust in Ukraine and the southern regions as a result of 3D gravity modeling. Kyiv: Naukova Dumka, 203 p. (in Ukrainian).
Mychak, S.V. (2014). Deformation of rocks of the Uman, Novograd-Volyn, and Novoukrainian massifs in the peri-od 2.02—2.05 according to the results of tectonophysical study. Geodyna¬mics, 17(2), 150—162. https://doi.org/10. 23939/ jgd2014.02.150 (in Ukrainian).
Nechaev, S.V., Gintov, O.B., & Mychak, S.V. (2019). On the relation between the rare-earth — rare-metal and gold ore mineralization and fault-block tectonics of the Ukrainian Shield. 1. Geo¬fi¬zi¬cheskiy Zhurnal, 41(1), 3—32. https://doi.org/10.24028/gzh.0203-3100.v41i1.2019.158861 (in Ukrainian).
Nechaeva, T.S., Shimkiv, L.M., & Gorkavko, V.M. (2002). Map of the anomalous magnetic field (ΔT)a Ukrainian. 1:1000 000. Kyiv, 1 p. (in Ukrainian).
Orlyuk, M.I. (2000). Spatial spatio-temporal models varying in structures continental lithosphere. Geofizicheskiy Zhurnal, 22(6), 148—165 (in Russian).
Orlyuk, M.I., & Bakarjieva, M.I. (2011).Geomagnetic criteria of diamond bearing of the Earth’s crust and 3D mag-netic modeling of prospective structures of the Ingul Megablock of the Ukrainian Shield. Heoloh Ukrainy, (1), 30—44 (in Ukrainian).
Orlyuk, M.I., Bakarjieva, M.I., & Marchenko, A.V. (2018). Geomagnetic field and magnetization of the Earth’s crust of the Ingul megablock, Golovaniv and Ingulets-Kremenchuk suture zones. Abstracts of Sci. Conf. «Geology and mi¬ne¬rals of Ukraine», Kyiv, October 2¬—4, 2018 (pp. 172—184) (in Ukrainian).
Orlyuk, M.I., & Pashkevich, I.K. (2012). Deep sources of regional magnetic anomalies: tec¬tonotypes and relation with transcrustal fa¬ults. Geofizicheskiy Zhurnal, 34(4), 224—234. https://doi.org/10.24028/gzh.0203-3100.v34i4. 2012.116776 (in Russian).
Orlyuk, M.I., Pashkevich, I.K., Burakhovich, T.K., Kuprienko, P.Ya., Makarenko, I.B., & Tsvetkova, T.A. (2018). Deep structure of the territory of Ukraine according to modern geophysical data. Ukrainian shield. In V.I. Starostenko, O.B. Gin¬tov (Eds.), Essays on the geodynamics of Ukraine (pp. 24—36). Kyiv: VI EN EY (in Rus¬sian).
Orlyuk, M.I., Romenets, A.A., Marchenko, A.V., Orlyuk, I.M., Ivashchenko, I.N. (2015). Magnetic declination of the territory of Ukraine: the results of observations and calculations. Geofizicheskiy Zhurnal, 37(2), 73—85. https://doi.org/10.24028/gzh.0203-3100.v37i2.2015.111307 (in Russian).
Pashkevich, I.K., & Bakarzhieva, M.I. (2013). 3D magnetic model of the Korsun-Novomirgorod pluton and the Novoukrainka massif and its geological interpretation. Geofizicheskiy Zhurnal, 35(4), 115—126. https://doi.org/10.24028/gzh.0203-3100.v35i4.2013.111427 (in Russian).
Pashkevich, I.K., Orlyuk, M.I., Eliseeva, S.V., Bakarjieva, M.I., Lebed, T.V., & Romenets, A.A. (2006). 3D magnetic model of the Earth’s crust of the Ukrainian Shield and its petrological and tectonic interpretation. Geofizicheskiy Zhurnal, 28(5), 7—18 (in Russian).
Ponomarenko, A.N., Stepanyuk, L.M., & Shumlyanskyi, L.V. (2014). Geochronology and geodynamics of the Paleoproterozoic of the Ukrainian shield. Mineralogicheskiy Zhurnal, 36(2), 48—60 (in Russian).
Ponomarenko, O.M., Lisna, I.M., Stepanyuk, L.M., Shumlyanskyi, L.V., Mineeva, V.M., Zayats, O.V., Sy-omka, L.V., Gulko, V.V., & Kova¬len¬ko, O.O. (2021). On the question of the age of charnockitoids of the Tashlyt complex (Ingul Me¬gablock of the Ukrainian Shield). Mineralo¬gi¬cheskiy Zhurnal, 43(3), 73—84 (in Ukrainian).
Starostenko, V.I., Kuprienko, P.Ya., Makarenko, I.B., Savchenko, A.S., & Legostaeva, O.V. (2015). Density heter-ogeneity of the Earth’s crust of the Ingul megablock of the Ukrainian Shield according to the data of three-dimensional gravity modeling. Geofizicheskiy Zhurnal, 37(3), 3—21. https://doi.org/10.24028/gzh.0203-3100.v37i3.2015.111089 (in Russian).
Stepanyuk, L.M., Vysotskyi, O.B., Kovtun, O.V., Kurylo, S.I., & Dovbush, T.I. (2022). Uranium-lead isotopic age of monazites of plagiogneyses of the ingulo-inguletse series (Ingul megablock of the Ukrainian Shield). Heokhimiia ta rudoutvorennia, (43), 12—19. https://doi.org/10.15407/gof.2022.43.012 (in Ukrainian).
Stoyanov, S.S. (1977). Mechanism of formation of discontinuous zones. Moscow: Nedra, 144 p. (in Russian).
Tectonophysical model of the lithosphere and dynamics of the earth’s crust in the Precambrian in connection with the development of detailed search criteria for ore minerals: report. Gin¬tov O.B. and others. Kyiv, 1990. 253 p. (in Russian).
Shevchuk, V.V., Kuz, I.S., & Yurchishin, A.S. (2002). Tectonophysical foundations of struc¬tu¬ral analysis. Lviv: Edition of the Ivan Franko National University of Lviv, 124 p. (in Ukrainian).
Shevchuk, V.V., Lavrenyuk, M.V., & Krav¬chen¬ko, D.V. (2013). Fundamentals of struc¬tu¬ral analysis. Kyiv: PPS «Kyyivs'kyy universytet», 287 p. (in Ukrainian).
Shcherbak, N.P., Artemenko, G.V., Lesnaya, I.M., Ponomarenko, A.N., Shumlyanskiy, L.V. (2008) Geochronology of Early Precambrian of the Ukrainian Shield. Proterozoic. Kiev: Naukova Dumka, 240 p. (in Russian).
Allmendinger, R., Cardozo, N., & Fisher, D. (2012). Structural geology algorithmas: vectors and tensors. Cam-bridge: Cambridge University Press, 313 p.
Bogdanova, S., Gintov, O.B., Kurlovich, D.M., Lubnina, N.V., Nilsson, M., Orlyuk, M.I., Pashkevich, I.K., Shum-lyanskyy, L.V., & Starostenko, V.I. (2013). Late Palaeoproterozoic ma¬fic dyking in the Ukrainian Shield of Vol-go-Sarmatia caused by rotation during the assembly of supercontinent Columbia (Nuna). Lithos, 174, 196—216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lithos. 2012.11.002.
Cardozo, N., & Allmendinger, R. (2012). Spherical projections with OSXStereonet. Computers & Geosciences, (51), 193—205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2012.07.021.
Fossen, H. (2010). Structural geology. Cambridge Univer. Pres. 463 p. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511777806.
Mychak, S., Farfuliak, L., Bakarzhyeva, M., Marchenko, A., & Hlavatskyi, D. (2022). The inner structure and kin-ematics of the Zvenyhorod-Brats`k fault zone of the Ukrainian Shield by the results of tectonophysics, magne-tometric and deep seismic sounding data. XVI Int. Scientific Conf. «Monitoring of Geological Processes and Ecological Condition of the Environment» 15—18 November 2022, Kyiv, Ukraine (pp. 1—5).
Orlyuk, M., Marchenko, A., Romenets, A., & Bakarjieva, M. (2018). Ukrainian Regional Magnetic Map: the results of calculations of the geomagnetic field components for the Epoch 2015. COBS Journal (Special Issue: IAGA Workshop 2018), (5), 40.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 S.V. Mychak, M.I. Bakarzhieva, M.I. Orlyuk, A.V. Marchenko, S.I. Kurylo
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
