Prospects of transition to European standards – features of Eurocode 8

Authors

  • I.A. Viktosenko Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic, Czechia
  • M.M. Dovbnich Dnipro University of Technology, Dnipro, Ukraine, Ukraine
  • M. Mazanec Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic, Czechia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24028/gj.v47i2.322493

Keywords:

DBN V.1.1.12-2014, Eurocode-8, seismic microzonation, shear-wave velocities, peak ground acceleration

Abstract

This paper analyzes the features of Eurocode-8, the European standard for earthquake-resistant construction, regarding seismic microzonation and seismic hazard assessment. The standard is compared to the methodology of similar studies in Ukraine. There is a significant difference in approaches to considering local near-surface geological conditions of survey sites. The study shows the critical role of shear-wave velocity in the uppermost subsurface as a primary indicator of a site’s seismic response. It explores innovative approaches to obtaining velocity characteristics based on multichannel analysis of surface waves and modeling regional near-surface velocity based on Shuttle Radar Topography Mission data. The key issue of implementing Eurocode-8 requirements in Ukrainian conditions is discussed, with a particular focus on making seismic hazard map based on peak ground acceleration.

References

Castellaro, S., Mulargia, F., & Rossi, P.L. (2008). Eqn014.wmf: Proxy for seismic amplification? seismological research letters. Seismological Research Letters, 79(4), 540—543. https://doi.org/10.1785/

gssrl.79.4.540.

DBN Ukrainy V.1.1.12-2014. (2014). Construction in seismic areas of Ukraine. Kyiv: Publ. House of the Ministry of Construction of Ukraine, 110 p. (in Ukrainian).

Dovbnich, M., & Viktosenko, I. (2023). Regional model Eqn015.wmf and seismic ground types for Ukraine. 17th International Conference Monitoring of Geological Processes and Ecological Condition of the Environment, EAGE, Kyiv.

Eurocode 8: design of structures for earthquake resistance. Part 1: general rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings. (2004). European standard EN 1998-1, European Committee for Standardization, Brussels. Retrieved from https://www.confinedmasonry.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/Eurocode-8-1-Earthquakes-general.pdf.

Kendzera, O., & Semenova, Y. (2021). Dynamic Deformation Characteristics of Soil in the Tasks of Seismic Micro Zoning. European Journal of Environment and Earth Sciences, 2(3), 41—48. https://doi.org/10.24018/ejgeo.2021.2.3.142.

Mazanec, M., & Valenta, J. (2023). Surface waves as a cost-effective tool for enhancing the interpretation of shallow refraction se ismic data. Acta Geodynamica et Geomaterialia, 20(3), 121―138. https://doi.org/10.13168/AGG.2023.0012.

Mazanec, M., Valenta, J., & Málek, J. (2024). Does VS30 reflect seismic amplification? Observations from the West Bohemia Seismic Network. Natural Hazards, 120, 12181—12202. https://doi.org/10.1007/11069-024-06679-x.

Newmark, N.M., & Rousenblueth, E. (1971). Fundamentals of Earthquake Engineering (pp. 61—99). Prentice-Hall 555 Inc., Englewood Cliffs.

Park, C.B., Miller, R.D., & Xia, J. (1999). Multichannel analysis of surface waves. Geophysics, 64(3), 800―808. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1444590.

Socco, L.V., Foti, S., & Boiero, D. (2010). Surface-wave analysis for building near-surface velocity models — Established approaches and new perspectives. Geophysics, 75(5), 75A83—75A102. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.3479491.

Wald, D.J., & Allen, T.I. (2007). Topographic slope as a proxy for seismic site conditions and amplification. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 97(5), 1379—1395. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120060267.

Downloads

Published

2025-04-07

How to Cite

Viktosenko, I., Dovbnich, M., & Mazanec, M. (2025). Prospects of transition to European standards – features of Eurocode 8. Geofizicheskiy Zhurnal, 47(2). https://doi.org/10.24028/gj.v47i2.322493

Issue

Section

Conferences