Magnetic anomalies and model of the magnetization in the Earth's crust of circumpolar and polar the sectors of Ural region
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24028/gzh.0203-3100.v39i1.2017.94014Keywords:
magnetic anomaly, magnetization, modeling, Earth's crust, Urals regionAbstract
The study of the structural features of the anomalous magnetic field for the territory of the circumpolar and polar sector of the Urals region was carried out. The anomalies of the Earth's crust layers were identified and the maps of such anomalies were created. Map of local anomalies was used for mapping basic-ultrabasic massifs in the upper parts of the foundation within the sedimentary basins. An interpretation of regional magnetic anomalies was carried out, a model structure of the Earth's crust and their parameters are based on the results of the studies along the DSS profiles. Comparison of the deep structure of the cuts produced by independent geophysical methods based on seismic and magnetic data has enabled us to share the consolidated crust into two layers with different magnetic properties. Top layer of the Earth's crust does not make a significant contribution into regional magnetic field and is characterized by a low magnetization (less than 0,3 A/m). Within this layer magnetized local sources were identified. The lower layer has greater crustal magnetization. As a result of the two-dimensional modeling of the value of the magnetization of the basalt layer of the crust is 3—4 A/m, The average depth to the top surface of the layer is 18—20 km. The resulting parameters were used for three-dimensional modeling, Model with uniform magnetization directed along the modern geomagnetic field has been considered. For the entire region it was built the upper surface of the magnetized layer, which allowed to clarify mafic layer in the space between the DDS profiles. It was found that at the Northern, Circumpolar and Polar Urals basalt layer plunged to a considerable depth of 26—30 km.
References
Anomalies of the geomagnetic field and deep crustal structure, 1982. Ed. Z.A. Krutikhovskaya. Kiev: Naukova Dumka, 172 p. (in Russian).
Byzov D.D., Muraviev L.A., 2015. Geomagnetic field vertical component calculation by magnetizated rods system approximation of its absolute value. Uralskiy geofizicheskiy vestnik (2), 24—28 (in Russian).
Geotraverse "Granite": East-European platform— Urals—Western Siberia (the structure of the Earth's crust as a result of complex geological and geophysical studies), 2002. (Ed. S.N. Kashubin). Yekaterinburg: IRA UTK, 312 p (in Russian).
Igolkina G.V., 2012, Borehole magnetometry survey at ultra-deep and deep wells. Yekaterinburg: UB RAS, 215 p. (in Russian).
Kolmogorova V.V., Fedorova N.V., 2015. Results of the deep structure crust modeling for Ural part of the Quartz Geotravers. Geofizika (6), 67— 82 (in Russian).
Krutikhovskaya Z.A., 1976. The problem of crea tion of the ancient shield crust. Geofizicheskiy sbornik (73), 3—29 (in Russian).
Krutikhovskaya Z.A., Pashkevich I.К., 1976. The magnetization of the crust of ancient shields and regional magnetic anomalies. In: Magnetic anomalies in the earth's depths. Kiev: Naukova Dumka, 108—125 (in Russian).
Krutikhovskaya Z.A., Pashkevich I.K, Silina I.M., 1982. The magnetic model and the structure of the crust of the Ukrainian Shield. Kiev: Naukova Dumka, 216 p. (in Russian).
Magnetic anomalies in the earth's depths, 1976. Ed. S.I. Subbotin. Kiev: Naukova Dumka, 232p. (in Russian).
Magnetic Prospecting: Handbook for Geophysicist, 1990. Eds V.E. Nikitskiy, Yu.S. Glebovskiy. Moscow: Nedra, 470 p. (in Russian).
Martyshko P.S., Prutkin I.L., 2003. Technology for separating the gravity sources by the depth. Geofizicheskiy zhurnal 25(3), 159—168 (in Russian).
Martyshko P.S., Rublev A.L., Pyankov V.A., 2010. Using local corrections technigue to solve structural magnetometry problems. Ceofizika (4), 3— 8 (in Russian).
Martyshko P.S., Fedorova N. V., Akimova E. N., Gemaydinov D. V., 2014. Studying the structural features of the lithospheric magnetic and gravity fields with the use of parallel algorithms. Izvestiya Physics of the Solid Earth, 50(4), 508—513 (in English). doi: 10.1134/S1069351314040 090.
Martyshko P.S., Fedorova N.V., Gemaidinov D.V., 2012. Study of the anomalous magnetic field structure in the Urals region using parallel algorithms. Doklady Earth Sciences, 446(1), 1102—1104 (in English). doi: 10.1134/S1028334X12090127.
Milanovsky E.E., 2006. Tectonic map of Russia, adjacent territories and water areas. 1 : 4000000. Moscow: Publ. MSU (in Russian).
Nagaytseva L.S., Zaporozhtseva I. V., 1984. Geomagnetic model of the crust of the European North- East of the USSR. Proceedings of the Institute of Geology, Komi Branch of the USSR Academy of Sciences, Is. 47, 46—49 (in Russian).
Orlyuk M.I., 2000. Spatial and spatio-temporal magnetic models of the varying in ranks structures lithosphere of the continental type. Geofizicheskiy zhurnal 22(6), 148—165 (in Russian).
Orlyuk M.I., MarchenkoA. V., Bakarzhieva M. I., 2013. Kursk magnetic anomaly: an analysis of the anomalous magnetic field according to the ground, stratospheric and satellite surveys. Collection of scientific works: Theoretical and applied aspects of geoinformatics. Kiev, 107—116 (in Ukrainian).
Orlyuk M.I., Pashkevich I.K., 2012. Deep sources of regional magnetic anomalies: tectonotypes and relation transcrustal faults. Geofizicheskiy zhurnal 34(4), 224—234 (in Russian).
Pashkevich I.K., Markovskiy V.S., Orlyuk M.L, EliseevaS.V., Mozgovaya O.P., Tarashchan S.A„ 1990. The magnetic model of the lithosphere of Europe. Kiev: Naukova Dumka, 168 p. (in Russian).
Pashkevich I.K., Orlyuk M.I., Eliseeva S. V., Bakarzhieva M.I., Lebed Т. V., Romenets A. A., 2006. 3D magnetic model of the Earth's crust of the Ukrainian Shield and its petrologic-tectonic interpretation. Geofizicheskiy zhurnal 28(5), 7—18 (in Russian).
Pashkevich I.K., Pecherskiy D.M., Gorodnitskiy A. M., Valyashko G.M., Verba V.V., Witte L.V., Wolk V.E., Genshaft Yu. S., Gordin V. M., Eliseeva S. V., Lukyanov S. V., Lykov A. V., Markovskiy V. S., Orlyuk M. I., Popov К. V., Shcherbakov V.P., 1994. Petromagnetic model of the lithosphere. Kiev: Esse, 175 p. (in Russian).
Pashkevich I.K., Sharov N. V., SavchenkoA.S., Starostenko V.I., 2014. Three-dimensional geological- geophysical model of the lithosphere of the central part of the Karelian Craton. Geofizicheskiy zhurnal 36(6), 58—78 (in Russian).
Pecherskiy D.M., Orlyuk M.I., Pashkevich I.K., 2006. Magnetism bottom of the crust over the world: the development of research results and ideas Z.A. Krutikhovskaya. Geofizicheskiy zhurnal 28(5), 40—52 (in Russian).
Prutkin I.L., 1986. The solution of the three-dimen- sional inverse problem of gravimetry in a class of contact surfaces by local corrections. Izvestiya AN SSSR. Fizika Zemli (1), 67—77 (in Russian).
Fedorova N. V., 2016. Mapping mafic-ultramafic massif in the upper horizons of the basement polar sector of Eurasia. Uralskiy geofizicheskiy vestnik (1), 48—52 (in Russian).
Fedorova N.V., 2001. Earth's crust magnetization model of Geotraverse Granite. Uralskiy geofizicheskiy vestnik (I), 88—93 (in Russian).
Fedorova N.V., Kolmogorova V.V., 2013. Models of distribution of the magnetization and the longitudinal wave velocity of the Earth's crust in Timan-Pechora and Northern Ural regions. Litosfera (5), 160—169 (in Russian).
Fedorova N. V., Kolmogorov V. V., Ladovskiy I. V., 2010. Geophysical model of crustal structure on Krasnoleninsk profile. Uralskiy geofizicheskiy vestnik (1), 59—68 (in Russian).
Fedorova N. V., Kolmogorova V. V., Rublev A. L., Tsidaev A.C., 2013. The magnetic model of the North- Eastern region of Europe. Ceofizicheskie issledovaniya 14(2), 25—37 (in Russian).
Fedorova N. V., Martyshko P.S., Gemaydinov D. V., Rublev A.L., 2015. The computer technology for highlighting the magnetic anomalies of the Earth crust layers, and results of its usage for the sector of northern Eurasia. Uralskiy geofizicheskiy vestnik (2), 58—66 (in Russian).
Fedorova N. V., Shapiro V.A ., Tyurmina L. O., 1989. Reference fields in regional aeromagnetic survey and detection of long-wave geomagnetic anomalies in the Ural area. Izvestiya AN SSSR. Fizika Zemli (4), 104—112 (in English).
Tsirulskiy A. V., Nikonova F. I., Fedorova N. V., І980. The method of interpretation of gravity and magnetic anomalies with the construction of families of equivalent solutions. Sverdlovsk: USC AS of USSR, 135 p. (in Russian).
Chuisin A. V., Prutyan A. M., Fedorova N. V., 2008. Digital map of the anomalous magnetic field of the Northern, Middle and Southern Urals and adjacent areas of the East European and West Siberian platforms. Litosfera (6), 63—72 (in Russian).
Shapiro V.A., Tsirulskiy A. V. Nikonova F.I., Fedorova N. V., Belyaeva O. Ya., Tyurmina L. O., Chursin A. V., 1982. The problem of constructing a magnetic model of the Earth's crust on the example of East-West crossing of the Urals. Izvestiya AN SSSR. Fizika Zemli (9), 39—50 (in Russian).
Fedorova N. V., Martyshko P.S., Gemaidinov D. V., Rublev A.L., 2015. Computer technology for highlighting the magnetic anomalies from the deep layers of the Earth's crust. EAGE International Conference on Geoinformatics — Teoretical and Applied Aspects, Geoinformatics, 1 —14 May 2015, Kiev, Ukraine. 4 p. doi: 10.3997/2214-4609. 201412426.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Geofizicheskiy Zhurnal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
