UAV application for geophysical research

Authors

  • А. Prystai Lviv centre of Institute for Space Research, Ukraine
  • B. Ladanivkyy Carpathian Department of the Institute of Geophysics by S. I. Subbotin name of the National Academy of sciences of Ukraine, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24028/gzh.0203-3100.v39i2.2017.97378

Keywords:

aeromagnetic exploration, drone, magnetometer, tests

Abstract

The paper provides an overview of the main features of the aeromagnetic survey techniques and some of their types with regards of their use with a new type of small unmanned carriers such as remotely piloted copters or drones. In connection with the emergence of a new set of requirements for on-board magnetometers for drones the development of the corresponding instrument was carried out. The comparison of the created flux-gate magnetometer LEMI-026 technical parameters with similar instrument from abroad is given; a number of its advantages over the known one by such the most important parameters — the sensitivity threshold and especially energy consumption — are noted. Using two constructed experimental models of magnetometer LEMI-026 the possibility of obtaining the data suitable for further processing was tested, and the results of these tests are described. It is shown that a strong anomaly of the magnetic field can be confidently identified and at the same time a number of problems that require solutions for more efficient use of small light UAV with a magnetometer was outlined. So, it is pointed that in order to take advantage of vector measurements that provides flux-gate sensor, the method of reducing the system of coordinates of mobile sensor to the geomagnetic coordinate system requires further upgrade. Existing algorithms for stationary magnetometers solve the problem only partially. Also further attention requires suspension system for separation by mechanical vibrations of drone motor and suspended magnetometer.

References

Verba V. S., Neronskiy L. B, Osipov I. G., Turuk V. G., 2010. Systems monitoring air, outer space and the Earth’s surface. Moscow: Radiotekhnika, 680 p. (in Russian).

Ladanivskyy B. T., 2013. Reduction of magnetovariation al data from arbitrary to geomagnetic reference system. Ukrayinskyy antarktychnyy zhurnal (12), 34—38 (in Ukrainian).

Ball L. B., Bloss B. R., Bedrosian P. A., Grauch V. J. S., Smith B. D., 2015. Airborne Electromagnetic and Magnetic Survey Data of the Paradox and San Luis Valleys, Colorado. Open-File Report 2015-1024, U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Geological Survey. 23 p.

Broughton Edge A. B., Laby T. N., 2012. The Principles and Practice of Geophysical Prospecting. Cambridge University Press, 404 p.

Clarke J., Gamble T. D., Goubau W. M., Koch R. H., Miracky R. F., 1983. Remote-reference magnetotellurics: Equipment and procedures. Geophys. Prospect. (31), 149—170.

Das Y., 2009. Soil magnetism and landmine (metal) detectors. In: J. A. Hannam, R. L. Van Dam, R. S. (eds.). Harmon Workshop on Soil Magnetism: Multidisciplinary Perspectives, Emerging Applications and New Frontiers. Report ERDC. P. 15—20.

Dobos E., Carrй F., Hengl T., Reuter H. I., Tуth G., 2006. Digital Soil Mapping as a support to production of functional maps. EUR 22123 EN, Luxemburg, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. 68 p.

Dyson L., Johnson C., Heppell E., Pieters M., 2007. Archaeological evaluation of wetlands in the Planarch area of North West Europe. The report. 91 p.

Geometrics, OYO Corporation, http://www.geometrics.com/geometrics-products/geometrics-magnetometers.

Holtham E., Oldenburg D. W., 2010. Three-dimensional inversion of ZTEM data. Geophys. J. Int. 182(1), 168—182. doi:10.1111/j.1365-246X.2010.04634.x.

Korepanov V., Marusenkov A., 2012. Flux-Gate Magnetometers Design Peculiarities. Surv. Geophys. (33), 1059—1079. doi:10.1007/s10712-012-9197-8.

Korepanov V., Tsvetkov Yu., 2005. Gradient magnetometer system for balloons. Proceedings of the 17th ESA Symposium on European Rocket and Balloon Programmes and Related Research, Sandefjord, Norway, 30 May — 2 June 2005. P. 443—448.

Korhonen J. V., 2005. Airborne Magnetic Method: Special Features and Review on Applications. Geological Survey of Finland, Special Paper (39), 77—102.

Linford N., 2009. Archaeogeophysics: Applications and challenges for magnetic methods. In: J. A. Hannam, R. L. Van Dam, R. S. Harmon (eds.). Workshop on Soil Magnetism: Multidisciplinary Perspectives, Emerging Applications and New Frontiers: Report. ERDC. Report. P. 35—36.

Lo B., Zang M., 2008. Numerical modeling of ZTEM (airborne AFMAG) responses to guide exploration strategies. 78th Annual International Meeting, SEG, Las Vegas, Expanded Abstracts (27). P. 1098—1101.

Lo B., Legault J. M., Kuzmin P., Combrinck M., 2009. ZTEM (Airborne AFMAG) tests over unconformity uranium deposits. 20th ASEG International Geophysical Conference and Exhibition, Australian Society of Exploration Geophysicists, Extended Abstracts. 4 p.

Mayr T., 2009. Digital Soil Mapping — spatial variability and prediction of soil properties. In: J. A. Hannam, R. L. Van Dam, R. S. Harmon (eds.). Workshop on Soil Magnetism: Multidisciplinary Perspectives, Emerging Applications and New Frontiers: Report. ERDC. Report. P. 41—45.

Pasion L. R., Billings S. D., Oldenburg D. W., Li Y., Lhomme N., 2009. Soil compensation techniques for the detection of buried metallic objects using electromagnetic sensors, In: J. A. Hannam, R. L. Van Dam, R. S. Harmon (eds.). Workshop on Soil Magnetism: Multidisciplinary Perspectives, Emerging Applications and New Frontiers: Report. ERDC. Report. P. 64.

Prystai A., Korepanov V., Dudkin F., Ladanivskyy B., 2016. Vector Magnetometer Application with Moving Carriers. Sensors & Transducers 207(is. 12), 44—49.

Reeves C., 2005, Aeromagnetic Surveys: Principles, Practice & Interpretation. Published by Geosoft, 155 p.

SENSYS GmbH, http://www.sensysmagnetometer.com/en/magdrone-one.html.

Stull S. D., 2015. From west to east: current approaches to medieval archaeology. Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 275 p. Unwin N., Postula A., 2015. Motor Bourn Magnetic Noise Filtering for Magnetometers. Sensors and Transducers 193(is. 10), 161—169.

Wannamaker P. E., Legault J. M., 2014. Two-dimensional joint inversion of ZTEM and MT plane-wave EM data for near surface applications. 27th Symposium on the Application of Geophysics to Engineering and Environmental Problems, SAGEEP. P. 134—139.

Published

2017-06-01

How to Cite

Prystai А., & Ladanivkyy, B. (2017). UAV application for geophysical research. Geofizičeskij žurnal, 39(2), 109–125. https://doi.org/10.24028/gzh.0203-3100.v39i2.2017.97378

Issue

Section

Articles