Abdominal vacuum therapy is a component of DAMAGE CONTROL SURGERY tactics for combat trauma to the abdomen

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26641/2307-0404.2024.3.313568

Keywords:

abdominal VAC-therapy, DCS tactics, combat abdominal trauma

Abstract

The goal of the study was to improve the outcomes of surgical care and treatment for patients with combat-related abdominal injuries at different levels of medical support during combat operations by using abdominal vacuum therapy as a component of Damage Control Surgery tactics.  At the II level of combat medical support within the Damage Control Surgery tactics, abdominal vacuum therapy was applied to 75 wounded male combatants with a combat abdominal injury, aged 37.4±8.3 years (main group). The comparison group consisted of 87 wounded patients aged 37.5±10.2 years, operated on using Damage Control Surgery tactics with drainage of the abdominal cavity and suturing of the skin only. 40.0% of the wounded in the main group and 46.0% of the comparison group were admitted with signs of traumatic shock of various degrees. According to the AdTS scale, 78.7% of the wounded in the main group were admitted in a serious condition, 21.3% – in an extremely serious condition; in the comparison group, 74.7% were in severe condition, 25.3% were in extremely severe condition. In 57.3% of the wounded of the main group, abdominal vacuum therapy was carried out in the irrigation-flow mode. 24.0% used standard bandages for abdominal vacuum therapy, 76.0% used partially improvised ones. The level of negative pressure was set in the range of 40-125 mm Hg in constant mode. Intra-abdominal pressure was measured by a standard method (through the bladder) at admission and after surgery. The assessment of the state of the abdominal cavity in the I and III phases of Damage Control Surgery was carried out according to the Abdominal Cavity Index scale – an integral assessment expressed in points based on factors that can be assessed visually during surgery. The volume of surgical interventions in the 1st phase of the Damage Control Surgery tactic depended on the nature of the damage to the abdominal organs and the condition of the wounded. After the completion of Phase I of Damage Control Surgery tactics, all wounded were evacuated by road medical transport and medical helicopters to the next level of medical support, with abdominal vacuum therapy during evacuation in the main group and Damage Control Resuscitation measures. Under the effect of abdominal vacuum therapy, the reduction of intra-abdominal pressure in the main group was pronounced (Δ=9.2; p<0.01) than in the comparison group (Δ=6.1; p<0.01). Abdominal vacuum therapy during the II phase of the Damage Control Surgery tactic made it possible to clean the abdominal cavity better (p<0.0001) than in the comparison group and provided better preparation for the implementation of the III phase of this tactic. As a result, reliable protection from external factors, active prevention of intra-abdominal pressure and rehabilitation of the abdominal cavity during the application of abdominal vacuum therapy during the II phase of Damage Control Surgery tactics in the main group of wounded after obstructive resections of the small intestine in the I phase made it possible to completely abandon terminal stomas in the III phase (in the comparison group – 5) in favor of the formation of small bowel intestinal anastomoses, and during obstructive colon resections, the number of terminal colostomas in the main group was reduced to 50.0% (in the comparison group -90.9%, р=0.004), also in favor of the formation anastomoses, which significantly improved the functional results of providing assistance to the wounded with a combat abdominal injury. The use of abdominal vacuum therapy during phases I-II of the Damage Control Surgery (DCS) tactics allows for the optimization of the scope of surgical interventions in phase III of Damage Control Surgery and significantly improves the functional outcomes of surgical care and treatment for patients with combat abdominal injuries at various levels of medical support during combat operations.

References

Skoroplit SM, Mykhnevich KG, Zamyatin PM, Khoroshun EM, Borodai VO, Tertyshny SV, et al. [Features of modern combat trauma and the organization of medical care]. Kharkivska khirurhichna shkola. 2022 Dec 30;6:51-3. Ukrainian. doi: https://doi.org/10.37699/2308-7005.6.2022.10

Zarutskyi YaL, Klishevych BA, Poleizjaev GO. [Combat closed abdominal trauma, diagnosis and treatment at the stages of medical and evacuation support]. Viiskova medytsyna Ukrainy. 2019;19(3):46-55. Ukrainian.

Polovyi VP, Railyanu SI, Palyanitsa AS, Chepega IG. [Application of "damage control" tactics in surgical treatment of victims with severe abdominal trauma]. Shpytalna khirurhiia. 2020;(3),63-9. Ukrainian. doi: https://doi.org/10.11603/2414-4533.2020.3.11463

Boychak MP, Yurchenko BV, Moshkivskyi VM, Fedorova OO. Development of the principles of treatment of patients with gunshot wounds according to the modern strategy of Damage Control Resuscitation. Ukrainskyi zhurnal viiskovoi medytsyny. 2022;2(3):120-8. Ukrainian. doi: https://doi.org/10.46847/ujmm.2022.2(3)-120

Rotondo MF, Schwab CW, McGonigal MD, Phillips GR, Fruchterman TM, Kauder DR. “Damage control”: an approach for improved survival in exsanguinating penetrating abdominal injury. Journal Trauma. 1993;35(3):375-82. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/00005373-199309000-00008

Hirshberg A, Walden R. Damage Control for abdominal trauma. Surgical Clinics of North America. 1997;4(77):813-20. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0039-6109(05)70586-7

Volpin G, Pfeifer R, Saveski J, Hasani I, Cohen M, Pape HC. Damage control orthopaedics in polytraumatized patients – current concepts. Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma. 2021;12(1):72-82. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcot.2020.10.018

Coccolini F, Montori G, Ceresoli M, Catena F, Ivatury R, Sugrue M, et. al. IROA: International Register of Open Abdomen, preliminary results. World Journal of Emergency Surgery. 2017;(12):10. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-017-0123-8

Roberts DJ, Bobrovitz N, Zygun DA, Kirkpatrick AW, Ball CG, Faris PD. Evidence for use of damage control surgery and damage control interventions in civilian trauma patients: a systematic review. World Journal of Emergency Surgery. 2021;16(1):10. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-021-00352-5

Pfeifer R, Pape HC. Trends in nomenclature to describe concepts in trauma patients: time for stan-dardization. Injury. 2020;51(11):2353-5. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2020.10.061

Padar M, Reintam BA, Talving P, Lipping E, Starkopf J. Abdominal Compartment Syndrome: Improving Outcomes With A Multidisciplinary Approach – A Nar-rative Review. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2019;12:1061-74. doi: https://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S205608

Pape HC, Halvachizadeh S, Leenen L, Velma-hos GD, Buckley R, Giannoudis PV. Timing of major fracture care in polytrauma patients - An update on principles, parameters and strategies for 2020. Injury. 2019;50(10):1656-70. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2019.09.021

Loftus TJ, Efron PA, Bala TM, Rosenthal MD, Croft CA, Walters MS, et al. The impact of standardized protocol implementation for surgical damage control and temporary abdominal closure after emergent laparotomy. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2019;86:670-8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000002170

Roberts DJ, Leppäniemi A, Tolonen M, Mentula P, Björck M, Kirkpatrick AW, et al. The open abdomen in trauma, acute care, and vascular and endovascular surgery: comprehensive, expert, narrative review. BJS Open. 2023;7(5):zrad084. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zrad084

Fernández LG. Treatment of Complex Thoracic and Abdominal Trauma Patients: A Review of Literature and Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Treatment Options. Advances in Wound Care. 2023;13(8):1-8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1089/wound.2023.0113

Zarutskyi YaL, Aslanyan SA, Zhovtonozhko OI, Oliynyk YuM, Forostyany PP, Honcharuk VS, et al. [Anatomic-functional scale for assessing the severity of injury in the wounded with thoraco-abdominal injuries in the conditions of the Joint Forces Operation]. Clinical surgery. 2020;87(1-2):3-7. Ukrainian. doi: https://doi.org/10.26779/2522-1396.2020.1-2.03

Savelyev VS, Gelfand BR, Filimonov MI, Podachin PV, Sergeeva NA. [Criteria for choosing effective tactics for surgical treatment of widespread peritonitis]. Annals of Surgery. 2013;2:48-54. Russian.

Antomonov MJ, Korobeinikov GV, Hmelnytska IV, Harkovliuk-Balakina NV. [Mathematical methods of processing and modeling the results of experimental research: a study guide]. Kyiv: Olimpiiska literatura; 2021. 216 p. Ukrainian.

Crumley C. Abdominal Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Devices for Management of the Open Abdomen: A Technologic Analysis. Journal of Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nursing. 2022;49(2):124-7. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/WON.0000000000000862

Fernandez LG, Sibaja Alvarez P, Kaplan MJ, et al. Application of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy with Instillation and Dwell Time of the Open Abdomen: Initial Experience. Cureus. 2019;11(9):e5667. doi: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.5667

Kocaaslan FND, Ozkan MC, Akdeniz Z, Sacak B, Erol B, Yuksel M, et al. Use of abdominal negative pres-sure wound therapy in different indications: a case series. Journal of Wound Care. 2019;28:4. doi: https://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2019.28.4.240

Mansoor J, Ellahi I, Junaid Z, Habib A, Ilyas U. Clinical evaluation of improvised gauzebased negative pressure wound therapy in military wounds. International Wound Journal. 2013;12(50):559-63. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.12164

Alhan D, Şahin I, Güzey S, Aykan A, Zor F, Öztürk S, et al. Staged repair of severe open abdomens due to highenergy gunshot injuries with early vacuum pack and delayed tissue expansion and dualsided meshes. Turkish Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery. 2015;21(6):457-62. doi: https://doi.org/10.5505/tjtes.2015.05942

Published

2024-04-01

How to Cite

1.
Aslanyan S, Bily V, Sobko I, Davidyuk M. Abdominal vacuum therapy is a component of DAMAGE CONTROL SURGERY tactics for combat trauma to the abdomen. Med. perspekt. [Internet]. 2024Apr.1 [cited 2024Nov.21];29(3):85-96. Available from: https://journals.uran.ua/index.php/2307-0404/article/view/313568

Issue

Section

CLINICAL MEDICINE