Complications of surgical treatment for esophageal leiomyoma: a case series

Ye. Kozak; Yu. Kondratskyi; I. Nastashenko; O. Dobrzhanskyi; M. Pepenin; A. Kolesnyk; Ye. Shudrak; A. Horodetskyi; V. Turchak; N. Koval; Ya. Svichkar; I. Ukrainets; S. Blizhnikova

doi:10.26641/2307-0404.2026.1.356815

Authors

Ye. Kozak NPO "National Cancer Institute", Yulii Zdanovska str., 33/43, Kyiv, 03022, Ukraine, Ukraine http://orcid.org/0009-0005-0726-2307
Yu. Kondratskyi NPO "National Cancer Institute", Yulii Zdanovska str., 33/43, Kyiv, 03022, Ukraine, Ukraine http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3664-5903
I. Nastashenko NPO "National Cancer Institute", Yulii Zdanovska str., 33/43, Kyiv, 03022, Ukraine, Ukraine http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6517-4437
O. Dobrzhanskyi NPO "National Cancer Institute", Yulii Zdanovska str., 33/43, Kyiv, 03022, Ukraine, Ukraine http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9422-4977
M. Pepenin NPO "National Cancer Institute", Yulii Zdanovska str., 33/43, Kyiv, 03022, Ukraine, Ukraine http://orcid.org/0009-0008-1803-1979
A. Kolesnyk NPO "National Cancer Institute", Yulii Zdanovska str., 33/43, Kyiv, 03022, Ukraine, Ukraine http://orcid.org/0009-0005-1824-3179
Ye. Shudrak NPO "National Cancer Institute", Yulii Zdanovska str., 33/43, Kyiv, 03022, Ukraine, Ukraine http://orcid.org/0009-0003-6270-2518
A. Horodetskyi NPO "National Cancer Institute", Yulii Zdanovska str., 33/43, Kyiv, 03022, Ukraine, Ukraine http://orcid.org/0009-0003-7902-9809
V. Turchak NPO "National Cancer Institute", Yulii Zdanovska str., 33/43, Kyiv, 03022, Ukraine, Ukraine http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1002-4466
N. Koval NPO "National Cancer Institute", Yulii Zdanovska str., 33/43, Kyiv, 03022, Ukraine, Ukraine http://orcid.org/0009-0006-0195-0798
Ya. Svichkar NPO "National Cancer Institute", Yulii Zdanovska str., 33/43, Kyiv, 03022, Ukraine, Ukraine http://orcid.org/0009-0008-5682-1234
I. Ukrainets NPO "National Cancer Institute", Yulii Zdanovska str., 33/43, Kyiv, 03022, Ukraine, Ukraine http://orcid.org/0009-0009-3968-2858
S. Blizhnikova NPO "National Cancer Institute", Yulii Zdanovska str., 33/43, Kyiv, 03022, Ukraine, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5655-2707

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26641/2307-0404.2026.1.356815

Keywords:

esophageal leiomyoma, postoperative complications, thoracoscopic surgery, enucleation, minimally invasive surgery, benign esophageal tumors, anastomotic leak, endoscopic vacuum therapy

Abstract

Esophageal leiomyomas are the most common benign tumors of the esophagus. While surgical resection is the definitive treatment for symptomatic cases, it carries a risk of postoperative complications. This study presents a case series on the surgical management of esophageal leiomyomas, with a particular emphasis on postoperative complications and their management. This retrospective case series, conducted at the National Cancer Institute (Kyiv, Ukraine), analyzed patients who underwent surgical treatment for symptomatic esophageal leiomyoma between 2021 and 2024 and developed postoperative complications classified as Clavien-Dindo grade III or higher. Data were collected from medical records, including demographics, tumor characteristics, surgical details, postoperative course, complications, management strategies, and outcomes. The total number of observations was n=3. Three cases with Clavien-Dindo III-IV postoperative complications were analyzed. Complications included anastomotic leakage following Ivor Lewis esophagectomy (managed with endoscopic stenting and endoscopic vacuum therapy – EVT), esophageal perforation during enucleation leading to mediastinitis (managed with stenting and endoscopic vacuum therapy), and a complex case involving hemopericardium, post-cardiac arrest syndrome, peritonitis and diaphragmatic herniation requiring multiple reinterventions. Despite the severity of these complications, multidisciplinary management led to complete recovery of all patients. Histopathological evaluation confirmed benign leiomyoma in all cases. Surgical management of esophageal leiomyomas, particularly for large tumors, is often associated with significant postoperative complications. While minimally invasive techniques may reduce these risks, they do not eliminate them entirely. Endoscopic therapy plays a critical role in the non-surgical management of anastomotic leakage and esophageal perforation. Vigilant postoperative monitoring and a multidisciplinary approach are essential for achieving favorable outcomes in these complex cases.

References

Gowrie S, Noel A, Wooten C, Powel J, Gielecki J, Zurada A, et al. Slicing Through the Options: A Systematic Review of Esophageal Leiomyoma Management. Cureus. 2025;17(4):e81614. doi: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.81614

Impellizzeri G, Donato G, De Angelis C, Pagano N. Diagnostic Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS) of the Luminal Gastrointestinal Tract. Diagnostics (Basel). 2024;14(10):996. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14100996

Asaf BB, Bishnoi S, Puri HV, et al. Robotic enucleation of oesophageal leiomyoma: technique and surgical outcomes. J Minim Access Surg. 2022;18(1):84-9. doi: https://doi.org/10.4103/jmas.JMAS_263_20

Li W, Shao M, Hu S, Xie S, He B. The diagnostic value of endoscopic ultrasound for esophageal subepithelial lesions: a review. Medicine (Baltimore). 2024;103(46):e40419. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000040419

Tien TPD, Trung LV, Nguyen HN. Minimally Invasive Enucleation of Esophageal Leiomyoma: Expe-rience From a Single Institution. Cureus. 2024;16(10):e71384. doi: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.71384

A-Lai GH, Hu JR, Yao P, Lin YD. Surgical Treatment for Esophageal Leiomyoma: 13 Years of Experience in a High-Volume Tertiary Hospital. Frontiers in Oncology. 2022;12:876277. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.876277

Mishra S, Jain N, Soni B, et al. Thoracoscopic enucleation of oesophageal submucosal tumours in prone position gives excellent long-term outcome: A single-centre experience. J Minim Access Surg. 2022;18(3):401-7. doi: https://doi.org/10.4103/jmas.JMAS_169_21

Tun KM, Dhindsa BS, Dossaji Z, et al. Efficacy and safety of submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection…: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 2900 patients. iGIE. 2023;2(4):529-537.e2. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.igie.2023.08.005

Liapis SC, Baloyiannis I, Perivoliotis K, et al. Submucosal Tunneling Endoscopic Resection for Upper Gastrointestinal Subepithelial Lesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer. 2025;56:110.

doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12029-025-01235-7

Kinney T, Waxman I. Treatment of benign esophageal tumors by endoscopic techniques. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2003;15(1):27-34. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1043-0679(03)00004-2

Daitch ZE, Heller SJ. Endoscopic ultrasonography in esophageal carcinoma: a narrative review. Annals of Esophagus. 2023;6:14.

doi: https://doi.org/10.21037/aoe-21-25

Triantafyllou A, Mela E, Theodoropoulos C, et al. Addressing Anastomotic Leak After Esophagectomy: Insights from a Specialized Unit. J Clin Med. 2025;14(11):3694. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14113694

Wang R, Guo Y, Duan X, Jiang H. Robot-assisted resection of oesophageal leiomyoma: a single-centre retrospective analysis of 57 cases. ANZ Journal of Surgery. 2025;95(3):356-62. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/ans.70022

Ubels S, Lubbers M, Verstegen MHP, et al. Treat-ment of anastomotic leak after esophagectomy: insights of an international case vignette survey and expert discus¬sions. Diseases of the Esophagus. 2022;35(12):doac020. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/dote/doac020

Milito P, Asti E, Aiolfi A, et al. Clinical Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Enucleation of Leiomyoma of the Esophagus and Esophagogastric Junction. J Gastrointest Surg. 2020;24(3):499-504. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-019-04210-3

Ubels S, Verstegen MHP, Rosman C, Reynolds JV. Anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: risk factors and operative treatment. Annals of Esophagus. 2021;4:8. doi: https://doi.org/10.21037/aoe-2020-18

Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, et al. The Clavien–Dindo classification of surgical complications. Annals of Surgery. 2009;250(2):187-96. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b13ca2

Low DE, Alderson D, Cecconello I, et al. International consensus on standardization of data collection for complications associated with esophagectomy. Annals of Surgery. 2015;262(2):286-94. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000001098

Livingstone I, Maloney A, Chowdhury A, Cad-dy G. Current Status of Endoscopic Vacuum Therapy in the Management of Esophageal Perforations and Post-Operative Leaks. Clinical Endoscopy. 2021;54(6):789-97. doi: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2021.240

Han S, Girotra M, Abdi M, et al. Endoscopic vacuum therapy. iGIE. 2024;3(3):333-41. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.igie.2024.06.003

Papadakos SP, Argyrou A, Katsaros I, et al. The Impact of EndoVAC in Addressing Post-Esophagectomy Anastomotic Leak in Esophageal Cancer Management. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2024;13(23):7113. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13237113

Goenka MK, Goenka U. Endotherapy of leaks and fistula. World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 2015;7(7):702-13. doi: https://doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v7.i7.702

Vohra I, Gopakumar H, Sharma NR, Puli SR. Ef-ficacy of endoscopic vacuum therapy in esophageal luminal defects: systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical Endoscopy. 2025;58(1):53-62. doi: https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2023.282