Features of surgical treatment of esophageal injuries complicated by purulent mediastinitis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26641/2307-0404.2020.3.214850Ключевые слова:
esophageal perforation, purulent mediastinitis, surgical tacticsАннотация
The goal of the work is to improve the results of treatment of patients with esophageal perforations complicated by purulent mediastinitis. Examination and treatment of 30 patients with esophageal perforation (EP) complicated by purulent mediastinitis were performed. The causes of EP were foreign body damages in 12 (40%) of 30 patients, spontaneous rupture of the esophagus – in 11 (36.6%), iatrogenic damage to the esophagus – in 7 (23.4%) patients. The main method of surgical treatment of esophageal perforations complicated by acute purulent mediastinitis is thoracotomy with suturing of the perforated wall of the esophagus and sanation of mediastinal tissue. In case of purulent melting of the esophageal wall and total mediastinitis with severe endogenous intoxication, surgical interventions should be aimed at minimizing surgical trauma and elimination of the purulent process in the mediastinum using video-assisted thoracoscopy. The use of developed surgical tactics for the treatment of esophageal perforations complicated by acute purulent mediastinitis with intramediastinal administration of antibacterial drugs and the method of irrigation of the esophageal sutures contributes to a significant rapid reduction in endogenous intoxication, namely leukocytosis units up to 2.103±0.182 d. units (p<0,001) with normalization of the indicator on the 5th day from the beginning of treatment, the severity of the condition on the APACHE II scale in the modification of Radzikhovsky AP from 14.91±1.80 points at the time of hospitalization to 9.4±0.3 points on the second day after surgery (p<0.001), the severity of patients’ condition on the SOFA scale on the 3rd day to 3.221±0.445 points, on the 5th day – 1.832±0.219 points (p<0.001), the level of C-reactive protein on the 2nd day after surgery decreased from 236.2±21.4 mg/l to 144.3±9.3 mg/l, and on the 3rd day was 112.1±7.2 mg/l (in both cases p<0.001), reducing the content of procaltcytonin from 8.7±0.9 ng/ml to 3.828±0.251 ng/ml on the 2nd day after surgery. The use of this surgical tactic allows you to quickly eliminate the purulent process in the mediastinum, reduce the healing time of the perforation of the esophagus and reduce mortality from 28.5 to 6.2%.Библиографические ссылки
Ivchenko GI, Vtlvedev YuI. Introduction to mathematical statistics. Moscow: publishing house LCI; 2010. p. 600. Russian.
Snizhko SS. [Analysis of the results of treatment of patients with esophageal injuries complicated by acute purulent mediastinitis]. Art of medicine. 2018;4(8):158-62. Ukrainian.
Shevchuk IM, Snizhko SS, Andreyeshchev SA. [Surgical treatment of patients with esophageal perforation complicated by acute purulent mediastinitis]. Clinical surgery. 2018;85(11):13-17. Ukrainian.
Mircea Chirica, Michael D Kelly, StefanoSiboni, Alberto Aiolfi, Carlo Galdino Riva, Emanuele Asti. Esophageal Emergencies: WSES Guide-lines World J Emerg Surg. 2019 May 31;14:26. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-019-0245-2
Mustafa Kupeli, Abdullah Dogan. SuccessfulTreatment of a Late Diagnosed Esophageal Perforation With Mediastinitis and Pericardial Abscess. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2018 Dec;28(12):972-3. doi: https://doi.org/10.29271/jcpsp.2018.12.972
Markar SR, Mackenzie H, Wiggins T, Askari A,Faiz O, Zaninotto G, Hanna GB. Management and Outco-mes of Esophageal Perforation: A National Study of 2,564 Patients in England. Am J Gastroenterol. 2015 Nov;110(11):1559-66. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/ajg.2015.304
Sasha Still, Marissa Mencio, Estrellita Ontiveros,James Burdick,Steven G Leeds. Primary and Rescue Endoluminal Vacuum Therapy in the Management of Esophageal Perforations and Leaks. Ann Thorac Cardio-vasc Surg. 2018 Aug 20;24(4):173-9. doi: https://doi.org/10.5761/atcs.oa.17-00107
Kruger M, Decker S, Schneider JP, Haverich A,Schega O. Surgical treatment of acute mediastinitis Chirurg. 2016 Jun;87(6):478-85. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00104-016-0171-8
Pezzetta E, Kokudo T, Uldry E, Yamaguchi T,et al. The surgical management of spontaneousesopha-geal perforation (Boerhaave’s syndrome) ‒ 20 years of experience. Biosci Trends. 2016 May 23;10(2):120-4. Russian. doi: https://doi.org/10.5582/bst.2016.01009
Singer M, Deutschman CS, Warren Seymour C,Manu Shankar-Hari, Djillali Annane, Bauer M, et al. "The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3)". JAMA. 2016;315(8):801-10. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.0287
Vest Michael T, Dross Peter. Boerhaave Syndrome. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2018 Nov 1;118(11):764. doi: https://doi.org/10.7556/jaoa.2018.165
Загрузки
Опубликован
Как цитировать
Выпуск
Раздел
Лицензия
Copyright (c) 2020 Medicni perspektivi (Medical perspectives)
Это произведение доступно по лицензии Creative Commons «Attribution» («Атрибуция») 4.0 Всемирная.
Submitting manuscript to the journal "Medicni perspektivi" the author(s) agree with transferring copyright from the author(s) to publisher (including photos, figures, tables, etc.) editor, reproducing materials of the manuscript in the journal, Internet, translation into other languages, export and import of the issue with the author’s article, spreading without limitation of their period of validity both on the territory of Ukraine and other countries. This and other mutual duties of the author and all co-authors separately and editorial board are secured by written agreement by special form to use the article, the sample of which is presented on the site.
Author signs a written agreement and sends it to Editorial Board simultaneously with submission of the manuscript.