Perceived quality of nursing education from a health systems perspective: a cross-sectional study of two universities in Albania
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26641/2307-0404.2026.1.356868Ключевые слова:
Nursing education, clinical learning environment, preceptorship, simulation-based education, AlbaniaАннотация
Nursing students’ perceptions of educational quality – particularly the clinical learning environment (CLE) – are an early indicator of whether programs are producing graduates who feel ready for practice. This study aimed to describe nursing students’ perceived educational quality and clinical learning environment (CLE) in two Albanian universities, and to identify factors independently associated with low perceived preparedness for practice. In May 2025, a cross-sectional questionnaire was administered to 367 students at the department of medical technical sciences, University “Aleksandër Moisiu” of Durrës and the University “Eqrem Çabej” of Gjirokastra. Items covered staff availability, teaching quality and clinical skills, preparedness for practice, teaching approaches, and placement conditions. Domain scales were created (Cronbach’s α ≥0.70) and low preparedness was defined as a preparedness score below the sample median. In multivariable binary and ordinal logistic regression, limited availability of clinical supervisors/preceptors, poorer overall CLE quality, and lower exposure to simulation-based teaching were independently associated with low preparedness. Descriptively, around half of respondents reported that key CLE domains need improvement, including distance to clinical practice sites (52.0%), transportation (49.6%), availability of equipment and supplies (50.1%), quality of supervision (50.1%), and student assessment (51.0%). Clinical supervisors/preceptors were often available for 31.9% of students. Only 23.4% rated clinical supervisors/preceptors’ teaching quality as good. Simulation and role-play were among the least frequently used teaching approaches. Students’ responses indicate systematic gaps in clinical supervision capacity, placement logistics, and clinical learning infrastructure. Strengthening structured preceptorship, clinical site agreements, and skills-lab/simulation capacity are practical targets for quality improvement.
Библиографические ссылки
Panda S, Dash M, John S, et al. Challenges faced by student nurses and midwives in the clinical learning environment: a systematic review and meta-synthesis. Nurse Educ Today. 2021;105:105141. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2021.105141
Cant R, Ryan C, Cooper S. Nursing students’ evaluation of clinical practice placements using the Clinical Learning Environment, Supervision and Nurse Teacher scale (CLES+T): a systematic review of the psychometric properties and factors influencing student satisfaction. Nurse Educ Today. 2021;104:104983. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2021.104983
Zhang Y, Wei W, Zhang L, et al. The clinical learning environment, supervision and future intention to be a nurse in nursing students: a cross-sectional and descriptive study. BMC Med Educ. 2022;22:548. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03609-y
World Health Organization. State of the world’s nursing 2025: investing in education, jobs, leadership and service delivery [Internet]. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2025 [cited 2025 Nov 28]. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240110236
Forbes H, Järvinen T, Korhonen A, et al. Explo-ring assessment policies for clinical practice: a scoping review. Nurse Educ Pract. 2023;68:103588. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2023.103588
Davis K, Stipcevich M, Cant R, Ryan C, Bogos-sian F. Addressing nursing student clinical placement poverty concerns: a discussion paper. Nurse Educ Today. 2025;144:106483. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2024.106483
Alhassan A, Duke M, Phillips NM. Nursing stu-dents’ satisfaction with the quality of clinical placement and their perceptions of preceptors competence: a prospective longitudinal study. Nurse Educ Today. 2024;133:106081. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2023.106081
Cronbach LJ. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika. 1951;16(3):297-334. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02310555
R Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing [Internet]. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2023 [cited 2025 Nov 28]. Available from: https://www.R-project.org/
Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S, Sturdivant RX. Ap-plied logistic regression. 3rd ed. Hoboken (NJ): Wiley; 2013. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118548387
Agresti A. An introduction to categorical data analysis. 3rd ed. Hoboken (NJ): Wiley; 2019.
McCullagh P. Regression models for ordinal data. J R Stat Soc Ser B. 1980;42(2):109-42. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1980.tb01109.x
Cant R, Ryan C, Cooper S, et al. Nursing student voices: a qualitative thematic synthesis of education elements supporting nursing students’ clinical learning during placement. Nurse Educ Pract. 2024;80:104150. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2024.104150
Russ D, Whiteing N, Aggar C. An integrative review of nursing students’ clinical placement experiences throu¬ghout their nursing degrees. Collegian. 2023;30(1):154-62. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colegn.2022.07.002
Kurt E, Eskimez Z. Examining self-regulated lear-ning of nursing students in clinical practice: a descriptive and cross-sectional study. Nurse Educ Today. 2022;109:105242. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2021.105242
Jadalla A, Hardan-Khalil K, Dyo M, et al. The perceived preparedness of prelicensure nursing students to transition to practice. Teach Learn Nurs. 2024;19(3):260-4. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teln.2024.04.001
Ugwu SN, Ogbonnaya NP, Chijioke VC, Esievo JN. Causes and effects of theory-practice gap during clinical practice: the lived experiences of baccalaureate nursing students. Int J Qual Stud Health Wellbeing. 2023;18:2164949. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/17482631.2023.2164949
Ota Y, Aikawa G, Nishimura A, et al. Effects of educational methods using extended reality on pre-registration nursing students’ knowledge, skill, confidence, and satisfaction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Nurse Educ Today. 2024;141:106313. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2024.106313
Lee TW, Damiran D, Konlan KD, Ji Y, Yoon YS, Ji H. Factors related to readiness for practice among undergraduate nursing students: a systematic review. Nurse Educ Pract. 2023;68:103614. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2023.103614
Lee TW, Damiran D, Konlan KD, et al. Clinical readiness for practice of nursing students: a concept analysis. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024;21(12):1610. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph21121610
von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, et al. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. PLoS Med. 2007;4(10):e296. doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0040296
Groves RM, Fowler FJ Jr, Couper MP, et al. Survey methodology. 2nd ed. Hoboken (NJ): Wiley; 2009. ISBN: 978-0-470-46546-2
Fowler FJ Jr. Survey research methods. 5th ed. [Internet]. Thousand Oaks (CA): SAGE; 2014 [cited 2025 Nov 28]. Available from: https://www.perlego.com/book/4792018/survey-research-methods-pdf
Szklo M, Nieto FJ. Epidemiology: beyond the basics. 4th ed. Burlington (MA): Jones & Bartlett Learning; 2019. ISBN: 9781284116595
Görücü Y, Günüşen NP, Arslan GG, et al. The effect of simulation-based learning on nursing students’ clinical decision-making skills: systematic review and meta-analysis. Nurse Educ Today. 2024;137:106270. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2024.106270
Ryan C, Hyun A, Hughes L, Bogossian F, Cooper S. Nursing students’ evaluation of clinical placement education quality: a national database analysis. Nurse Educ Pract. 2024;81:104185. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2024.104185
Загрузки
Опубликован
Как цитировать
Выпуск
Раздел
Лицензия
Copyright (c) 2026 Medicni Perspektivi

Это произведение доступно по лицензии Creative Commons «Attribution» («Атрибуция») 4.0 Всемирная.
Submitting manuscript to the journal "Medicni perspektivi" the author(s) agree with transferring copyright from the author(s) to publisher (including photos, figures, tables, etc.) editor, reproducing materials of the manuscript in the journal, Internet, translation into other languages, export and import of the issue with the author’s article, spreading without limitation of their period of validity both on the territory of Ukraine and other countries. This and other mutual duties of the author and all co-authors separately and editorial board are secured by written agreement by special form to use the article, the sample of which is presented on the site.
Author signs a written agreement and sends it to Editorial Board simultaneously with submission of the manuscript.



