Prognostic factors of intracranial purulent-septic complications of combat-related gunshot penetrating skull and brain wounds.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26641/2307-0404.2019.3.181881Ключові слова:
purulent-septic complications, intracranial complications, craniocerebral wounds, combat-related gunshot wounds, prognostic factors, antibacterial therapy, mortality, outcomesАнотація
Purpose – to analyze the structure of intracranial purulent-septic complications (IPSC), determine the factors influencing development of purulent-septic complications in patients with combat-related gunshot penetrating skull and brain wounds (CRPSBW), determine the effect of intracranial PSC on patients’ outcomes. A prospective analysis of results of examination and treatment of 121 patients was performed. All patients had gunshot penetrating skull and brain wounds sustained in combat conditions during a local armed conflict in the Eastern Ukraine. Evaluation of treatment outcome included analysis of mortality in 1 month (survived/died) and dichotomous Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) score in 12 months (favorable/unfavorable outcome). 121 wounded men aged 18 to 56 (average, 34.1±9.1) were included in the study. Intracranial purulent-septic complications (IPSC) were diagnosed in 14 (11.6%) gunshot CRPSBW patients. The following prognostic factors had statistically significantly correlation with the risk of intracranial purulent-septic complications development: wound liquorrhea on admission (p = 0.043), intraventricular hemorrhage (p = 0.007), bone fragments left in the wound (p = 0.0152), and duration of inflow-outflow wound drainage for more than 3 days (p= 0.0123). Intracranial PSC patients had mortality rate of 50%, and only 14.3% of those patients had a favorable outcome according to GOS score in one year. Presence of intracranial PSC had statistically significant association with mortality rate (p=0.0091) and GOS score in one year (p=0.0001).
Посилання
Aarabi B. Causes of infections in penetrating head wounds in the Iran-Iraq War. Neurosurgery. 1989:923. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/00006123-198912000-00011
Aarabi B. Comparative study of bacteriological contamination between primary and secondary exploration of missile head wounds. Neurosurgery. 1987;20(4):610-616. doi: https://doi.org/10.1227/00006123-198704000-00018
Aarabi B. Surgical Outcome in 435 Patients Who Sustained Missile Head Wounds during the Iran-Iraq War. Neurosurgery. 1990;27(5):692-695. doi: https://doi.org/10.1227/00006123-199011000-00004
Brandvold B, Levi L, Feinsod M, George E. Penetrating craniocerebral injuries in the Israeli involvement in the Lebanese conflict, 1982–1985. Journal of Neurosurgery. 1990;72(1):15-21. doi: https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1990.72.1.0015
Carey M, Young H, Rish B, Mathis J. Follow-up study of 103 American soldiers who sustained a brain wound in Vietnam. Journal of Neurosurgery. 1974;41(5):542-549. doi: https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1974.41.5.0542
Coşar A, Gönül E, Kurt E, Gönül M, Taşar M, Yetişer S. Craniocerebral Gunshot Wounds: Results of Less Aggressive Surgery and Complications. min - Minimally Invasive Neurosurgery. 2005;48(2):113-8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2004-830222
Stephens F, Mossop C, Bell R, Tigno T, Rosner M, Kumar A, et al. Cranioplasty complications following wartime decompressive craniectomy. Neurosurgical Focus. 2010;28(5):E3. doi: https://doi.org/10.3171/2010.2.FOCUS1026
Jennett B, Snoek J, Bond M, Brooks N. Disability after severe head injury: observations on the use of the Glasgow Outcome Scale. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry. 1981;44(4):285-93. doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.44.4.285
Bell R, Mossop C, Dirks M, Stephens F, Mulligan L, Ecker R, et al. Early decompressive craniectomy for severe penetrating and closed head injury during wartime. Neurosurgical Focus. 2010;28(5):E1. doi: https://doi.org/10.3171/2010.2.FOCUS1022
Erdogan E, Izci Y, Gonul E, Timurkaynak E. Ventricular Injury following Cranial Gunshot Wounds: Clinical Study. Military Medicine. 2004;169(9):691-5. doi: https://doi.org/10.7205/MILMED.169.9.691
Ling G, Bandak F, Armonda R, Grant G, Ecklund J. Explosive Blast Neurotrauma. Journal of Neurotrauma. 2009;26(6):815-825. doi: https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2007.0484
Fathalla H, Ashry A, El-Fiki A. Managing military penetrating brain injuries in the war zone: lessons learned. Neurosurgical Focus. 2018;45(6):E6. doi: https://doi.org/10.3171/2018.8.FOCUS18371
Gleeson T, Petersen K, Mascola J. Successful treatment of Acinetobacter meningitis with meropenem and rifampicin. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. 2005;56(3):602-603. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dki274
Carney N, Totten A, OʼReilly C, Ullman J, Hawryluk G, Bell M et al. Guidelines for the Management of Severe Traumatic Brain Injury, Fourth Edition. Neurosurgery. 2016;1. doi: https://doi.org/10.1227/NEU.0000000000001432
Hospenthal D, Murray C, Andersen R, Bell R, Calhoun J, Cancio L, et al. Guidelines for the Prevention of Infections Associated With Combat-Related Injuries: 2011 Update. The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care. 2011;71:S210-S234. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e318227ac4b
Meirowsky A. Secondary removal of retained bone fragments in missile wounds of the brain. Journal of Neurosurgery. 1982;57(5):617-21. doi: https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1982.57.5.0617
Bell R, Vo A, Neal C, Tigno J, Roberts R, Mossop C, et al. Military Traumatic Brain and Spinal Column Injury: A 5-Year Study of the Impact Blast and Other Military Grade Weaponry on the Central Nervous System. The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care. 2009;66(Supplement):S104-S111. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e31819d88c8
Myers P, Brophy J, Salazar A. Retained bone fragments after penetrating brain wounds: long−term follow−up in Vietnam veterans. Journal of Neurosurgery. 1989;70:319.
Pitlyk P, Tolchin S, Stewart W. The experimental significance of retained intracranial bone fragments. Journal of Neurosurgery. 1970;33(1):19-24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1970.33.1.0019
Salazar A, Schwab K, Grafman J. Penetrating Injuries in the Vietnam War: Traumatic Unconsciousness, Epilepsy, and Psychosocial Outcome. Neurosurgery Clinics of North America. 1995;6(4):715-726. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1042-3680(18)30427-3
Ragel B, Klimo P, Martin J, Teff R, Bakken H, Armonda R. Wartime decompressive craniectomy: technique and lessons learned. Neurosurgical Focus. 2010;28(5):E2. doi: https://doi.org/10.3171/2010.3.FOCUS1028
Whitman T. Infection Control Challenges Related to War Wound Infections in the ICU Setting. The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care. 2007;62(Supplement):S53. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e318065aa71
Wilson J, Pettigrew L, Teasdale G. Structured Interviews for the Glasgow Outcome Scale and the Extended Glasgow Outcome Scale: Guidelines for Their Use. Journal of Neurotrauma. 1998;15(8):573-85. doi: https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.1998.15.573
##submission.downloads##
Як цитувати
Номер
Розділ
Ліцензія
Авторське право (c) 2019 Медичні перспективи
Ця робота ліцензується відповідно до Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Submitting manuscript to the journal "Medicni perspektivi" the author(s) agree with transferring copyright from the author(s) to publisher (including photos, figures, tables, etc.) editor, reproducing materials of the manuscript in the journal, Internet, translation into other languages, export and import of the issue with the author’s article, spreading without limitation of their period of validity both on the territory of Ukraine and other countries. This and other mutual duties of the author and all co-authors separately and editorial board are secured by written agreement by special form to use the article, the sample of which is presented on the site.
Author signs a written agreement and sends it to Editorial Board simultaneously with submission of the manuscript.
