HET-CAM test in evaluation of irritating action of adhesives used in shoe making industry

Автор(и)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26641/2307-0404.2023.4.294232

Ключові слова:

shoe adhesives, irritating action, the hen's egg test on the chorioallantoie membrane assay, in vitro method

Анотація

The global tendency of the contemporary scientific studies is using alternative biologic models as substitutes of experimental animals. HET-CAM (The Hen's Egg Test on the Chorioallantoie Membrane Assay) is an alternative to in vivo tests involving experimental animals. This test is actively used in different biomedical studies. The aim of our work was to study the irritating potential of adhesives used in shoe making industry in experimental setting using the alternative HET-CAM method. Polyurethane, polychloroprene, rubber and styrene-butadiene adhesives that are widely used in shoe-making industry were studied . HET-CAM test was used for the evaluation of the irritating action of the aforementioned adhesives. All adhesives were applied directly onto the chorioallantoic membrane of chick embryos with reactions and changes (hemorrhages, vascular lysis and coagulation) observed and registered in 30, 120 and 300 seconds after the application of the adhesive. Irritating potential of the adhesives was evaluated according to a calculated irritating index. The most pronounced signs of irritating action were caused by polyurethane adhesives, namely hemorrhages and coagulation (30 sec) – two-component adhesive and hemor­rhages (30 sec) and coagulation (120-300 sec) – one-component adhesive. Vascular reactions from application of sty­rene-butadiene adhesives manifested predominantly with lysis and hemorrhages (30 sec), in some samples these reactions were observed at a later time-point (120-300 sec). Irritating action of rubber adhesives manifested mostly with hemor­rhages (30 sec), one observation showed lysis (120 sec). Polychloroprene adhesive caused hemorrhages (30-120 sec) and also lysis (30 sec) in one of the samples. According to the irritating index, polyurethane (one- and two-component) and styrene-butadiene adhesives were estimated to be strong irritants, while rubber and polychloroprene ones cause moderate irritating action. НЕТ-САМ test can be used as a component in the evaluation of evidence of irritating action of shoe adhesives.

Посилання

Maestri E. The 3Rs principle in animal experimentation: A legal review of the state of the art in Europe and the case in Italy. BioTech (Basel). 2021;10(2):9. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/biotech10020009

Laroche C, Annys E, Bender H, Botelho D, et al. Finding synergies for the 3Rs - Repeated Dose Toxicity testing: Report from an EPAA Partners' Forum. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2019;108:104470. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2019.104470

Vimalraj S, Renugaa S, Dhanasekaran A. Chick embryo chorioallantoic membrane: a biomaterial testing platform for tissue engineering applications. Process Biochemistry. 2023;124:81-91. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2022.11.007

Harnoss JC, Abu Elrub QM, Jung J, Koburger T, et al. Irritative potency of selected wound antiseptics in the hen's egg test on chorioallantoic membrane to predict their compatibility to wounds. Wound Repair and Regeneration. 2019;27(2):183-9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/wrr.12689

Rivero MN, Lenze M, Izaguirre M, Damonte SH, et al. Comparison between HET-CAM protocols and a product use clinical study for eye irritation evaluation of personal care products including cosmetics according to their surfactant composition. Food and Chemical Toxicology. 2021;153:112229. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2021.112229

Budai P, Kormos É, Buda I, et al. Comparative evaluation of HET-CAM and ICE methods for objective assessment of ocular irritation caused by selected pesticide products. Toxicology in vitro. 2021;74:105150. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tiv.2021.105150

Talaei S, Mahboobian MM, Mohammadi M. Investigating the ocular toxicity potential and therapeutic efficiency of in situ gel nanoemulsion formulations of brinzolamide. Toxicology Research. 2020;9:578-87. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/toxres/tfaa066

Chen L, Wang S, Feng Y, Zhang J, et al. Utilisation of chick embryo chorioallantoic membrane as a model platform for imaging-navigated biomedical research. Cells. 2021;10(2):463. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/cells10020463

Viera LM, Silva RS, da Silva CC, Presgrave OA, et al. Comparison of the different protocols of the Hen's Egg Test-Chorioallantoic Membrane (HET-CAM) by eva-luating the eye irritation potential of surfactants. Toxicol in vitro. 2022;78:105255. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tiv.2021.105255

Ribatti D. The chick embryo chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) assay. Reprod Toxicol. 2017;70:97-101. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reprotox.2016.11.004

Kuzminov BP, Turkina VA, Chemodurova NYe. [Methodological guidelines. Evaluation of ir¬ritation action of substances on the chorioallantoic membrane of the chick embryo (HET-CAM test)]. Lviv; 2023. р. 20. Ukrainian. doi: https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.32544.56322

Antomonov MYu. [Mathematical processing and analysis of medical and biological data]. Кyiv: MYCz "Medynform"; 2018. р. 579. Russian.

Lukács J, Präßler J, Gebhardt M, Elsner P. Adhe-sives and glues. Kanerva’s Occupational Dermatology. Springer; 2020. р. 891-900. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68617-2_59

Paiva RM, Marques EA, da Silva LF, António CA, Arán-Ais F. Adhesives in the footwear industry. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part L: Journal of Materials: Design and Applications. 2016;230(2):357-74. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1464420715602441

Orgiles-Calpena ME, Aran-Ais F, Torro-Palau AM, et al. Adhesives in the footwear industry: a critical review. Rev Adhesion Adhesives. 2019;7(1):69-91. doi: https://doi.org/10.7569/RAA.2019.097303

Schenk L, Rauma M, Fransson MN, Johanson G. Percutaneous absorption of thirtyeight organic solvents in vitro using pig skin. PLoS One. 2019;13(10):e0205458. doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0205458

Vinardell MP, Mitjans M. The chorioallantoic membrane test as a model to predict the potential human eye irritation induced by commonly used laboratory solvents.Toxicol in vitro. 2006;20(6):1066-70. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tiv.2005.11.004

Scholten B, Kenny L, Duca RC, et al. Biomonitoring for occupational exposure to diisocyanates: A systematic review. Ann Work Expo Health. 2020 Jul 1;64(6):569-85. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/annweh/wxaa038

Jones K, Galea KS, Scholten B, et al. HBM4EU Diisocyanates study-research protocol for a collaborative european human biological monitoring study on occupa-tional exposure. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 20;19(14):8811. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19148811

Shebe KhA. Сontact dermatitis caused by synthetic glue. Current Allergy & Clinical Immunology. 2013;26(3):152-5.

Han J, Lee GY, Bae G, Kang MJ, et al. ChemSkin reference chemical database for the development of an in vitro skin irritation test. Toxics. 2021;9(11):314. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics9110314

Schrage A, Gamer AO, van Ravenzwaay B, Landsiedel R. Experience with the HET-CAM method in the routine testing of a broad variety of chemicals and formulations. Altern Lab Anim. 2010;38(1):39-52. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/026119291003800109

Fraguas-Sánchez AI, Martín-Sabroso C, Torres-Suárez AI. The chick embryo chorioallantoic membrane model: a research approach for ex vivo and in vivo experiments. Curr Med Chem. 2022;29(10):1702-17. doi: https://doi.org/10.2174/0929867328666210625105438

##submission.downloads##

Опубліковано

2023-12-22

Як цитувати

1.
Lototska-Dudyk U, Kuzminov B, Chemodurova N, Turkina V. HET-CAM test in evaluation of irritating action of adhesives used in shoe making industry. Med. perspekt. [інтернет]. 22, Грудень 2023 [цит. за 03, Грудень 2024];28(4):189-9. доступний у: https://journals.uran.ua/index.php/2307-0404/article/view/294232

Номер

Розділ

ПРОФІЛАКТИЧНА МЕДИЦИНА