Clinical efficacy and safety of high-dose ambroxol in the form of oromucosal spray in postnasal drip syndrome: results of a multicenter study in Ukraine
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26641/2307-0404.2025.2.333376Ключевые слова:
postnasal drip syndrome, ambroxol, oromucosal spray, postnasal dripping, rhinosinusitis, rhinopharyngitis, efficacy, safety, multicenter studyАннотация
Postnasal drip syndrome (PNDS) is one of the most common clinical conditions in the practice of otolaryngologists and family physicians, characterized by the drainage of mucous or mucopurulent secretions along the posterior wall of the pharynx and accompanied by rhinorrhea, nasal congestion, cough, and a feeling of irritation in the throat. Epidemiological studies show that approximately 20% of the adult population and 15% of children regularly suffer from manifestations of postnasal drip. The pathogenetic mechanisms of the development of PNDS are mucus hypersecretion, impaired rheological properties, dysfunction of mucociliary clearance, and local inflammation. The aim of our study was to clinically evaluate the efficacy and safety of different dosage regimens of the drug "Respx® Spray" (ambroxol) for postnasal drip on the background of common respiratory diseases. A large-scale prospective observational multicenter study was conducted, which included 1867 patients aged 12 to 65 years from 15 regions of Ukraine. The study lasted from September 2023 to March 2024. Patients had various respiratory diseases accompanied by postnasal drip: rhinopharyngitis (47.3%), acute rhinosinusitis (34.0%), vasomotor rhinitis (7.4%), tonsillopharyngitis (4.6%), acute tracheobronchitis (3.8%) and laryngitis/laryngotracheitis (2.9%). The effectiveness of the use was assessed by the dynamics of the intensity of postnasal drip on a 5-point scale at the beginning and on the 5-7th day of treatment. The safety of the drug was monitored by registering and analyzing adverse reactions. The results of the study showed a statistically significant decrease in the intensity of postnasal drip from 4.28±0.03 to 0.91±0.03 points on the 5th day of therapy (p<0.001). The highest efficiency was recorded with the dosage regimens of 4 sprays 4 times a day (decrease to 0.38±0.10 points) and 3 sprays 2 times a day (decrease to 0.60±0.15 points). Subjective assessment of the dynamics of symptoms by patients showed a rapid development of the therapeutic effect – already on the 2nd day of treatment, patients noted a moderate improvement (1.55±1.19 points), and on the 5th day a significant improvement was observed (4.66±0.99 points). The highest subjective improvement rates were recorded in patients with hypertrophic rhinitis (4.56±0.08 points) and tracheitis/acute bronchitis/acute tracheobronchitis (4.52±0.15 points). Overall satisfaction with the treatment was extremely high – 76.4% of patients rated it at 9-10 points on a 10-point scale, another 20.3% – at 7-8 points. Multivariate regression analysis revealed that the effectiveness of the treatment was significantly influenced by factors such as the dosage regimen (p<0.01), the initial intensity of the symptom (p<0.001) and the underlying disease (p<0.05). Non-serious adverse reactions were observed in only 1.2% of patients, which is a fairly low rate and indicates a good safety profile of the drug. The obtained data indicate that ambroxol in the form of a high-dose oromucosal spray is an effective and safe means for alleviating the manifestations of postnasal drip, ensuring high compliance and patient satisfaction. The choice of dosage regimen should be made taking into account the nature of the underlying disease and the initial intensity of postnasal drip syndrome. The safety of the preparation was monitored through registration and analysis of adverse reactions. The results of the study established a statistically significant reduction in the intensity of postnasal dripping from 4.28±0.03 to 0.91±0.03 points on the 5th day of therapy (p<0.001). The highest clinical efficacy was observed with dosing regimens of 4 jets 4 times a day (reduction to 0.38±0.10 points) and 3 jets 2 times a day (reduction to 0.60±0.15 points). Patients' subjective assessment of symptom dynamics indicated a rapid development of therapeutic effect – by the 2nd day of treatment, patients noted moderate improvement (1.55±1.19 points), and by the 5th day, significant improvement in condition was observed (4.66±0.99 points). The highest indicators of subjective improvement were recorded in patients with hypertrophic rhinitis (4.56±0.08 points) and tracheitis/acute bronchitis/acute tracheobronchitis (4.52±0.15 points). Overall treatment satisfaction was exceptionally high – 76.4% of patients rated it at 9-10 points on a 10-point scale, while another 20.3% gave it 7-8 points. Multivariate regression analysis revealed that treatment efficacy was significantly influenced by factors such as dosing regimen (p<0.01), baseline symptom intensity (p<0.001), and underlying disease (p<0.05). The obtained data indicate that ambroxol in the form of oromucosal spray is an effective and safe remedy for the treatment of postnasal syndrome of various etiologies, providing high compliance and patient satisfaction. The selection of dosing regimen should be tailored according to the nature of the underlying disease and the baseline intensity of the postnasal syndrome.
Библиографические ссылки
Babchenko NV, Dieieva YuV, Konovalov SE, Motailo OV. [Expression indicators of mucopolysaccharides MUC 5AC and MUC 1 in the nasal mucosa in patients with postnasal drip syndrome and nasal septum curvature]. Klinichna ta profilaktychna medytsyna. 2024;(2):43-8. Ukrainian. doi: https://doi.org/10.31612/2616-4868.2.2024.06
Dykewicz MS, Wallace DV, Amrol DJ, et al. Rhinitis 2020: A practice parameter update. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2020;146:721-67. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2020.07.007
Sanu A, Eccles R. Postnasal drip syndrome. Two hundred years of controversy between UK and USA. Rhinology. 2008;46(2):86-91.
Krajewska J, Zub K, Słowikowski A, Zatoński T. Chronic rhinosinusitis in cystic fibrosis: a review of therapeutic options. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2022:1-24. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-021-06875-6
Kumar A, Sharma S, Singh P, et al. Comparison of different formulations of mucolytics in post-nasal drip: a network meta-analysis. Eur Respir J. 2024;63:2302544. doi: https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.02544-2023
Trykhlib V, Zadorozhna V, Tkachuk S, Palatna L, Operchuk N. The Incidence of Acute Upper Respiratory Infections of Multiple or Uncertain Localization in Ukrainian Children. Actual Infectology. 2016;(3.12):83-92. doi: https://doi.org/10.22141/2312-413x.3.12.2016.81720
Naumenko OM, Zabolotnyi DI, Dieieva YuV, Zabolotna DD. [Features of the clinical course of acute rhi-nosinusitis in COVID-19]. Pohlyad otorynolarynholoha. II Scientific and Practical Conference; 2021. Ukrainian. Available from: http://ir.librarynmu.com/bitstream/123456789/8230/1/Особливості%20клінічного.pdf
Scaglione F, Petrini O. Mucoactive Agents in the Therapy of Upper Respiratory Airways Infections: Fair to Describe Them Just as Mucoactive? Clin Med Insights Ear Nose Throat. 2019;12. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1179550618821930
Paleari D, Rossi GA, Nicolini G, Olivieri D. Ambroxol: a multifaceted molecule with additional therapeutic potentials in respiratory disorders of childhood. Expert Opin Drug Discov. 2011;6(11):1203-14. doi: https://doi.org/10.1517/17460441.2011.629646
Weiser T. Ambroxol: a CNS drug? CNS Neurosci Ther. 2008;14(1):17-24. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-3458.2007.00032.x
Malerba M, Ragnoli B. Ambroxol in the 21st century: pharmacological and clinical update. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol. 2019;12:1-10. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/17425255.2019.1670168
Beeh KM, Beier J, Esperester A, Paul LD. Antiin-flammatory properties of ambroxol. Eur J Med Res. 2008;13:557-62.
Zhang ZQ, Wu QQ, Huang XM, Lu H. Prevention of respiratory distress syndrome in preterm infants by antenatal ambroxol: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Perinatol. 2023;30:529-36. doi: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0032-1329188
Kantar A, Klimek L, Cazan D, Sperl A, Sent U, Mesquita M. An overview of efficacy and safety of am-broxol for the treatment of acute and chronic respiratory diseases with a special regard to children. Multidiscip Respir Med. 2020;15(1):511. doi: https://doi.org/10.4081/mrm.2020.511
Cheng X, Xie Q, Sun Y. Advances in nanomaterial-based targeted drug delivery systems. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2023;11:1177151. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2023.1177151
Collins JC, Moles RJ. Management of respiratory disorders and the pharmacist's role: Cough, colds, and sore throats and allergies (including eyes). Encyclopedia of pharmacy practice and clinical pharmacy. 2019:282. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-812735-3.00510-0
de Mey C, Patel J, Lakha DR, Richter E, Koelsch S. Efficacy and Safety of an Oral Ambroxol Spray in the Treatment of Acute Uncomplicated Sore Throat. Drug Res (Stuttg). 2015;65(12):658-67. doi: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0035-1547229
Chenot JF, Weber P, Friede T. Efficacy of Ambroxol lozenges for pharyngitis: a meta-analysis. BMC Fam Pract. 2014;15:45.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-15-45
Brahmeshwar Mishra, Juhi Singh. Novel drug deli-very systems and significance in respiratory diseases. In: Tar¬geting Chronic Inflammatory Lung Diseases Using Advanced Drug Delivery Systems. Academic Press; 2020. p. 57-95. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-820658-4.00004-2
Doulaptsi M, Prokopakis E, Seys S, Pugin B, Steelant B, Hellings P. Visual analogue scale for sino-nasal symptoms severity correlates with sino-nasal outcome test 22: paving the way for a simple outcome tool of CRS burden. Clin Transl Allergy. 2018;8:32. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13601-018-0219-6
Butcher NJ, Monsour A, Mew EJ, et al. Guidelines for Reporting Outcomes in Trial Reports: The CONSORT-Outcomes 2022 Extension. JAMA. 2022;328(22):2252-2264. doi: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2022.21022
Walther C, Döring K, Schmidtke M. Comparative in vitro analysis of inhibition of rhinovirus and influenza virus replication by mucoactive secretolytic agents and plant extracts. BMC Complement Med Ther. 2020;20:380. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12906-020-03173-2
Cheng L, Liu M, Wang R, Cao S, Li R, Su B, et al. Ambroxol hydrochloride spray (Luo Runchang®) in the treatment of acute respiratory infectious diseases: a pro-spective, multicenter, open label, randomized controlled study. Front Pediatr. 2024;12:1380189. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2024.1380189
Alkotaji M. Azithromycin and ambroxol as po-tential pharmacotherapy for SARS-CoV-2. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2020;56:106192. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2020.106192
Nakahari T, Suzuki C, Kawaguchi K, Hosogi S, Tanaka S, Asano S, et al. Ambroxol-Enhanced Frequency and Amplitude of Beating Cilia Controlled by a Voltage-Gated Ca2+ Channel, Cav1.2, via pHi Increase and [Cl−]i Decrease in the Lung Airway Epithelial Cells of Mice. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24:16976. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms242316976
Загрузки
Опубликован
Как цитировать
Выпуск
Раздел
Лицензия
Copyright (c) 2025 Medicni perspektivi

Это произведение доступно по лицензии Creative Commons «Attribution» («Атрибуция») 4.0 Всемирная.
Submitting manuscript to the journal "Medicni perspektivi" the author(s) agree with transferring copyright from the author(s) to publisher (including photos, figures, tables, etc.) editor, reproducing materials of the manuscript in the journal, Internet, translation into other languages, export and import of the issue with the author’s article, spreading without limitation of their period of validity both on the territory of Ukraine and other countries. This and other mutual duties of the author and all co-authors separately and editorial board are secured by written agreement by special form to use the article, the sample of which is presented on the site.
Author signs a written agreement and sends it to Editorial Board simultaneously with submission of the manuscript.



