Reconfiguring interpretive bias in smokers: an integrated approach combining identity and contextual interventions

Tongshun Cheng; Nazia Feroze; Muhammad Sabil Farooq

doi:10.26641/2307-0404.2026.1.356966

Автор(и)

Tongshun Cheng Nankai University, Weijin str., 94, Nankai District, Tianjin, 300071, Китай https://orcid.org/0009-0002-2128-2070
Nazia Feroze Nankai University, Weijin str., 94, Nankai District, Tianjin, 300071, Китай https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5206-7643
Muhammad Sabil Farooq Qilu Institute of Technology, East Jingshi str., 3028, Jinan, 250200, Shandong, Китай https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7034-0172

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26641/2307-0404.2026.1.356966

Ключові слова:

interpretive bias, smokers, smoker identity, contextual interventions, psychological interventions

Анотація

Smoking-related interpretive bias, a core aspect of cognitive distortion in addiction, remains poorly understood regarding its specific characteristics and underlying activation mechanisms. This study addressed this gap through three sub studies exploring the intrinsic properties of smokers’ interpretive bias, the role of smoker identity, and the moderating effect of cognitive load. The Ambiguous Scenario Test was employed to assess interpretive bias. Results revealed that smokers exhibited significantly higher levels of smoking related interpretive bias compared to nonsmokers. Furthermore, smokers with a strong smoker identity displayed more pronounced bias than those with a weak identity. Importantly, the predictive influence of smoker identity on this bias diminished as cognitive load increased, indicating that cognitive resources modulate the identity bias relationship. These findings suggest that sufficient cognitive capacity is necessary for smoker identity to effectively activate associated interpretive biases. By clarifying the core features of smoking-related interpretive bias, identifying smoker identity as a key contributor, and demonstrating cognitive load’s moderating role, this research advances theoretical understanding of cognitive bias components and triggering mechanisms in smokers. The results also hold practical implications for developing targeted interventions aimed at disrupting maladaptive cognitive processes in smoking behavior.

Посилання

Albery IP, Shove E, Bartlett G, Frings D, Spada MM. Individual differences in selective attentional bias for healthy and unhealthy food-related stimuli and social identity as a vegan/vegetarian dissociate “healthy” and “unhealthy” orthorexia nervosa. Appetite. 2022;178:106261. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2022.106261

Beck AT, Haigh EA. Advances in cognitive theory and therapy: The generic cognitive model. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2014;10(1):1-24. doi: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032813-153734

Callaghan L, Yong HH, Borland R, Cummings KM, Hitchman SC, Fong GT. What kind of smoking identity following quitting would elevate smokers’ relapse risk? Addict Behav. 2021;112:106654. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2020.106654

Cao M, Xie P, Sun L, Zhang J, Kong F, Zhou Z. Processing priority for avatar reference in online games: Evidence from behavioral and ERP studies. Acta Psychol Sin. 2021;53(6):639-50. doi: https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1041.2021.00639

Chen H, Fan Y, Li X, Gao L, Li W. The relation-ship between smoker identity and smoking cessation among young smokers: The role of smoking rationalization beliefs and cultural value of guanxi. Front Psychiatry. 2022;13:812982. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2022.812982

Chen H, Wang Y, Zhao B, Yao J, Li W. Identity and smoking refusal self-efficacy in Chinese male smokers: The mediating role of smoking refusal outcome expectancies and the moderating role of social norms. J Psychol Sci. 2023;46(6):1504-10. doi: https://doi.org/10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.20230618

Chen H, Yang Y, Zheng E, Fan Y, Gao L. Smokers’ “bulletproof vest”: The formation mechanism and interventions of self-exempting beliefs. Adv Psychol Sci. 2024;32(4):654-63. doi: https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1042.2024.00654

Cheng J, Guan Y, Zhang Y, Bi Y, Bu L, Li Y, et al. Electrophysiological mechanisms of biased response to smoking-related cues in young smokers. Neurosci Lett. 2016;629:85-91. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2016.06.044

Chu J, Pink SL, Willer R. Religious identity cues increase vaccination intentions and trust in medical experts among American Christians. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021;118(49):e2106481118. doi: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2106481118

Copersino ML. Cognitive mechanisms and therapeutic targets of addiction. Curr Opin Behav Sci. 2017;13:91-8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2016.11.005

Cox LS, Tiffany ST, Christen AG. Evaluation of the brief questionnaire of smoking urges (QSU-brief) in laboratory and clinical settings. Nicotine Tob Res. 2001;3(1):7-16. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/14622200124218

Drichoutis AC, Nayga RM Jr. Economic rationality under cognitive load. Econ J. 2020;130(632):2382-409. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/ej/ueaa070

Dunham Y, Emory J. Of affect and ambiguity: The emergence of preference for arbitrary ingroups. J Soc Issues. 2014;70(1):81-98. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12060

Falomir-Pichastor JM, Blondé J, Desrichard O, Felder M, Riedo G, Folly L. Tobacco dependence and smoking cessation: The mediating role of smoker and ex-smoker self-concepts. Addict Behav. 2020;102:106200. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2019.106200

Feng Z, Zhang D, Yang G. Recalling, recognition, and priming processing in middle school students with depressive symptoms. Acta Psychol Sin. 2008;40(2):166-74. doi: https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1041.2008.00166

Frings D, Albery IP. The social identity model of cessation maintenance: Formulation and initial evidence. Addict Behav. 2015;44:35-42. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2015.01.007

Grigutsch LA, Lewe G, Rothermund K, Koranyi N. Implicit “wanting” without implicit “liking”: A test of incentive sensitization theory in the context of smoking addiction using the wanting implicit association test (W-IAT). J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2019;64:9-14. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbtep.2019.05.002

Haslam C, Haslam SA, Jetten J, Cruwys T, Steffens NK. Life change, social identity, and health. Annu Rev Psychol. 2021;72(1):635-61. doi: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-122419-033451

Haslam SA, Oakes PJ, Reynolds KJ, Turner JC. Social identity salience and the emergence of stereotype consensus. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 1999;25(7):809-18. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167299025007004

Heatherton TF, Kozlowski LT, Frecker RC, Fagerström KO. The Fagerström test for nicotine depen-dence: A revision of the Fagerström Tolerance Question-naire. Br J Addict. 1991;86(9):1119-27. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.1991.tb01879.x

Hehman E, Mania EW, Gaertner SL. Where the division lies: Common ingroup identity moderates the cross-race facial recognition effect. J Exp Soc Psychol. 2010;46(2):445-8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2009.11.007

Hirsch CR, Clark DM, Mathews A. Imagery and interpretations in social phobia: Support for the combined cognitive biases hypothesis. Behav Ther. 2006;37(3):223-36. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beth.2006.02.002

Hofmann W, Friese M, Wiers RW. Impulsive versus reflective influences on health behavior: A theoretical framework and empirical review. Health Psychol Rev. 2008;2(2):111-37. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/17437190802617668

Huijding J, de Jong PJ, Wiers RW, Verkooijen K. Implicit and explicit attitudes toward smoking in a smoking and a nonsmoking setting. Addict Behav. 2005;30(5):949-61. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2004.09.020

Jones A, Field M. Does cognitive bias modification reduce alcohol consumption? In: Cooke R, Conroy D, Davies EL, Hagger MS, de Visser RO, editors. The Palgrave handbook of psychological perspectives on alcohol consumption. Cham: Springer International Pub-lishing; 2021. p. 527-50. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-66941-6_24

Kale D, Jackson S, Brown J, Garnett C, Shahab L. Social smoker identity and associations with smoking and quitting behaviour: A cross-sectional study in England. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2024;260:111345. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2024.111345

Lakritz C. When control over food spirals out of control: Investigating the cognitive mechanisms of food hyper-selectivity in individuals suffering from anorexia nervosa and orthorexia nervosa [doctoral dissertation]. [Internet]. Lyon: Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1; 2023 [cited 2025 Dec 23]. Available from: https://hal.science/tel-04449969v1/file/Final_Manuscrit_Lakritz_Clara_pour_impression.pdf

Li T, Feng F. Interpretation bias in social anxiety: Research paradigms, characteristics and modification. Adv Psychol Sci. 2013;21(12):2196-203. doi: https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1042.2013.02196

Liang M, Zhao Y, Yin C. Common ingroup identity promotes ethnic psychological compatibility: The mediating role of positive interpretation bias. J Psychol Sci. 2023;46(2):386-93. doi: https://doi.org/10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.20230214

Lindgren KP, Neighbors C, Gasser ML, Rami-rez JJ, Cvencek D. A review of implicit and explicit substance self-concept as a predictor of alcohol and tobacco use and misuse. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2017;43(3):237-46. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00952990.2016.1213272

Moan IS, Rise J. Quitting smoking: Applying an extended version of the theory of planned behavior to predict intention and behavior. J Appl Biobehav Res. 2005;10(1):39-68. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9861.2005.tb00006.x

Motschman CA, Tiffany ST. Cognitive regulation of smoking behavior within a cigarette: Automatic and nonautomatic processes. Psychol Addict Behav. 2016;30(4):494-9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/adb0000160

Poole R, Carver H, Anagnostou D, Edwards A, Moore G, Smith P, et al. Tobacco use, smoking identities and pathways into and out of smoking among young adults: A meta-ethnography. Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2022;17:24. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13011-022-00448-9

Robinson TE, Berridge KC. The neural basis of drug craving: An incentive-sensitization theory of addic-tion. Brain Res Rev. 1993;18(3):247-91. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-0173(93)90013-P

Roccas S, Brewer MB. Social identity complexity. Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2002;6(2):88-106. doi: https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327957PSPR0602_01

Salemink E, Wiers RW. Adolescent threatrelated interpretive bias and its modification: The moderating role of regulatory control. Behav Res Ther. 2012;50(1):40-6. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2011.10.006

Salemink E, Woud ML, Roos M, Wiers R, Lind-gren KP. Reducing alcohol-related interpretive bias in negative affect situations: Using a scenario-based cogni-tive bias modification training paradigm. Addict Behav. 2019;88:106-13. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2018.08.028

Sritharan R, Gawronski B. Changing implicit and explicit prejudice. Soc Psychol. 2010;41(3):113-23. doi: https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000017

Wang X, Zhu J, Liu L, Chen X. Cognitive processing bias in Chinese student teachers with strong and weak professional identity. Front Psychol. 2017;8:784. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00784

Wilcockson TD, Pothos EM, Osborne AM, Crawford TJ. Top-down and bottom-up attentional biases for smoking-related stimuli: Comparing dependent and nondependent smokers. Addict Behav. 2021;118:106886. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2021.106886

Wittekind CE, Schiebel T, Kühn S. Reliability of and associations between cognitive bias measures and response inhibition in smoking. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2023;81:101853. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbtep.2023.101853

Woud ML, Fitzgerald DA, Wiers RW, Rinck M, Becker ES. “Getting into the spirit”: Alcohol-related inter-pretation bias in heavy drinking students. Psychol Addict Behav. 2012;26(3):627-32. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028142

Woud ML, Becker ES, Rinck M, Salemink E. The relationship between drinking motives and alcohol-related interpretation biases. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2015;47:102-10. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbtep.2014.12.004

Xia X, Wang D, Li Y, Zhu X, Tan X, Wu Y. The trial-by-trial fluctuations in primary motor cortex excitability during attentional bias among smokers: A transcranial magnetic stimulation study. Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2024;24(2):100468. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijchp.2024.100468

Xin C, Chen Y, Tian M, Liu G. The self-reference effect in prospective memory and its cognitive mechanisms in elementary school students aged 7 to 11 years. Acta Psychol Sin. 2025;57(5):775-91. doi: https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1041.2025.00775

Yang H, Wang F, Gu N, Huang X. Processing priority for self-related information: Evidence from visual search of screen names. Acta Psychol Sin. 2012;44(4):489-97. doi: https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1041.2012.00489

Yu J, Cui Z, Pan L, Sun J, Cao Y, Wang Y, et al. Smoking prevalence among 20-80-year-old Han residents in urban and rural regions of Hebei province. Chin J Public Health. 2022;38(1):61-4. doi: https://doi.org/10.11847/zgggws1134589

Zhao B, Chen H. Effects of smoking social cues on inhibitory control in smokers: An event-related potential study. Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2023;23(4):100387. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijchp.2023.100387