Advantage Clean & Porous TM new technological methods of surface treatment of dental implants
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15587/2313-8416.2015.38096Keywords:
methods of SLA and RBM, implants, osseointegration, structured porous surface, Clean & Porous TMAbstract
The purpose of this study was a comparative analysis of the surfaces of dental implants treated with technological methods SLA and RBM to identify their positive and negative characteristics. Based on these results to develop a new process Clean & Porous surface treatment of dental implants to obtain highly, rough and porous surface, which is characteristic for the technology SLA, and absolutely clean surface characteristic of technology RBM, without their disadvantages (unwarranted complete removal of abrasive particles SLA case and the absence of a clear structure of the surface topography in the case of RBM).
The structure and purity of the implant surface Straumann, Alfa-Bio, DIO, Finish Line. studied in micrographs obtained by an electron microscope (SEM) at the University of Technion (increase 500,2000,3000). To study the chemical properties of the samples, the method of X-ray energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS), based on an analysis of its X-ray emission energy spectrum.
Comparative analysis of the implant surfaces treated with the methods and RBM SLA showed that despite the reliability of these methods, each of them has certain disadvantages (contamination cases alumina particle surface with sufficient structural SLA and craters on the surface organized RBM). Developed by Finish Line Materials and Processes Ltd new technology of surface treatment of dental implants Clean & PorousTM, combining the best characteristics of the methods of SLA and RBM, possible to obtain a well-structured and absolutely clean surface.
The proposed new original method Clean & PorousTM treatment of dental implants meet the criteria (roughness, porosity and surface finish of the implant), which provide an ideal osseointegration. Since osseointegration is a key issue in modern implantology it enables to obtain reliable primary fixation of the implant in the bone. From a clinical point of view it reduces the healing of the implant, as well as creating conditions accelerate the start of prosthetics.
References
Pavlenko, A. B., Gorban', S. A., Ilyk, R. R., Shterenberg, B. (2009). Poverhnost' implanta, ejo rol' i znachenie v osteointegracii. Sovremennaja stomatologija, 4, 101–108.
Cochran, D. L., Schenk, R. K., Lussi, A., Higginbottom, F. L., Buser, D. (1998). Bone response to unloaded and loaded titanium implants with a sunblasted and acid-etched surface: a histometric study in the conine mandible. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, 40 (2), 1–11. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-4636(199804)40:1<1::aid-jbm1>3.0.co;2-q
Testori, T., Wiseman, L., Woolfe, S., Porter, S. (2001). A prospective multicenter clinical study of the ossetite implants four-year interim report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 16, 193–200.
Esposito, M., Coulthard, P., Thomsen, P., Worthington, H. V. (2005). Interventions for peplacing missing teeth: different types of dental implants. Cochrone Database Sys Rev, 25, CD003815.
Taba, M., Novaes, A. B., Souza, S. L. S., Grisi, M. F. M., Palioto, D. B., Pardini, L. C. (2003). Radiographic Evaluation of Dental Implants with Different Surface Treatments: An Experimental Study in Dogs. Implant Dentistry, 12 (3), 252–258. doi: 10.1097/01.id.0000075580.55380.e5
Esposito, M., Hirsch, J.-M., Lekholm, U., Thomsen, P. (1998). Biological factors contributing to failures of osseointegrated oral implants, (I). Success criteria and epidemiology. Eur J Oral Sci, 106 (1), 527–551. doi: 10.1046/j.0909-8836..t01-2-.x
Wennerberg, A., Albrektsson, T., Andersson, B., Krol, J. J. (1995). A histomorghometric study of screw-shaped and removal torque titanium implants with three different surface topographies. Clin Oral Implants Res, 6 (1), 24–30. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.1995.060103.x
Hansson, S., Norton, M. (1999). The relation between surface roughness and interfacial shear strength for bone-anchored implants. A mathematical model. Journal of Biomechanics, 32 (8), 829–836. doi: 10.1016/s0021-9290(99)00058-5
Sanz, R. A., Oyarzún, A., Farias, D., Diaz, I. (2001). Experimental Study of Bone Response to a New Surface Treatment of Endosseous Titanium Implants. Implant Dentistry, 10 (2), 126–131. doi: 10.1097/00008505-200104000-00009
Sanz, R. A., Qyarzum, A., Farias, D., Diaz, I. (2006). Experimental study of bone response to a new surface treatment of endosseous titanium implants. J. Oral. Impl., 64–67.
Odont, P. P., Odont, R. B., Odont, J. T., Pesquera, A., Odont, J. L., Nishimura, R., Nasr, H. (1997). Countertorque testing and histomorphometric analysis of various implant surfaces in canines: a pilot study. Implant Dentistry, 6 (4), 259–265. doi: 10.1097/00008505-199700640-00002
Brett, P. M., Harle, J., Salih, V., Mihoc, R., Olsen, J., Jones, F. H. et al. (2004). Roughness response genes in osteoblasts. Bone, 3 5(1), 124–133. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2004.03.009
Kieswetter, R., Schwartz, Z., Hummert, T. W., Cochran, D. L., Simpson, J., Dean, D. D., Boyan, B. D. (1996). Surface roughness modulates the local production of growth factors and cytokines by osteolast-like MG-63 cells. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, 32 (1), 55–63. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-4636(199609)32:1<55::aid-jbm7>3.0.co;2-o
Cooper, L. F. (2000). A role for surface topography in creating and maintaining bone at titanium endosseous implants. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 84 (5), 522–534. doi: 10.1067/mpr.2000.111966
Wennerberg, A., Hallgren, C., Johansson, C., Danelli, S. (1998). A histomorphometric evaluation of screw-shaped implants each prepared with two surface roughnesses. Clin Oral Implants Res, 9 (1), 11–19. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.1998.090102.x
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2015 Лев Ильич Винников, Филипп Захарович Савранский, Роман Вячеславович Симахов, Петр Олегович Гришин
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Our journal abides by the Creative Commons CC BY copyright rights and permissions for open access journals.
Authors, who are published in this journal, agree to the following conditions:
1. The authors reserve the right to authorship of the work and pass the first publication right of this work to the journal under the terms of a Creative Commons CC BY, which allows others to freely distribute the published research with the obligatory reference to the authors of the original work and the first publication of the work in this journal.
2. The authors have the right to conclude separate supplement agreements that relate to non-exclusive work distribution in the form in which it has been published by the journal (for example, to upload the work to the online storage of the journal or publish it as part of a monograph), provided that the reference to the first publication of the work in this journal is included.
