Philosophic-literary reading ability aspects of pupils

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/2313-8416.2015.57180

Keywords:

philosophical and literary ideas, students with low achievement, corrective study literature

Abstract

In the article the philosophical and literary factors organizations cognitive process of students with low literary development. It was found significant discrepancies in the interpretation of the essence of scholars teaching and remedial work philologist. Thanks to synergetic methodology defined implementation strategy and targeted development of personal potential of students through art word by mastering fundamental intellectual, moral and aesthetic cultural values

Author Biography

Ольга Дмитрівна Мхитарян, V. Sukhomlinsky Mykolaiv National University 24 Nikolskaya str., Mykolaiv, Ukraine, 54030

Associate Professor of philological education

Candidate of Pedagogical Sciences 

References

Sytchenko, A. (2004). Education technology concept literary analysis. Kyiv. Lenvit, 304.

Lutay, V. (1996). Philosophy of modern education: teach. guidances. Kyiv: Center «Master-S» Creative Union of Teachers Ukraine, 256.

Sytchenko, A., Shulyar, V., Gladyshev, V.; Sytchenko, A. (Ed.) (2008). Teaching method References terminological dictionary. Kyiv: John Jure, 132.

Skovoroda, G. (1961). Writings. In 2 volumes. Vol. 1. Publisher USSR, 350.

The program for secondary schools (2005). Ukrainian literature. 5–12 classes. Perun, 201.

Jurkiewicz, Pamphil (2000). History of philosophy of law. Kind. 2nd edition. «Ukrainian World», 756.

Lazarev, F. (2000). Reason for the new century: global reorientation. Simferopol: Sonata, 88.

Jaspers, K. (1991). Spiritual situation TIME. Moscow: Politizdat, 288–418.

Bilous, O. (2001). Ukrainian upgrade path in the XXI century. Kyiv an antiquity, 6, 20–30.

Pasichnyk, E. (2000). Methods of teaching Ukrainian literature in secondary schools: textbook for students of higher educational institutions. Lenvit, 384.

Hyrshman, M. (1991). Literary Works: Theory and Practice analysis. Moscow: Higher School, 160.

Hrom'yak, R., Kuznetsov, Y. et. al. (1997). Literary Dictionary Directory. Academy, 752.

Prozorov, V. (1985). Author and reader orientation of art. The problem of the author in fiction: Interuniversity collection of scientific papers. Ustinov, 27–32.

Galich, Alexander (2001). Literary Theory: a textbook. Kyiv: Lybid, 488.

Potebnya, A. (2001). Thought and language (fragments). Anthology of World literary-critical thought twentieth century. Lviv: Chronicle, 34–52.

Nayenko, M. (1997). Ukrainian literary schools, trends. Academy, 320.

Myropolska, N. (2002). Word Art in the structure of student artistic culture. Theory and parliamentary publishing house, 204.

Mark, V. (2003). Fundamentals analysis of literary works. Kirovograd: RVTS KSPU them. Vynnychenka B., 32.

Schelling, F. (1966). Philosophy of Art. Moscow: Thought, 496.

Descartes R. (1989). Basic rules of method. Sokolov V. Works. In 2 volumes. Vol. 1. Moscow: Thought, 256–262.

Ylychev, L., Fedoseev, P., Kovalev, S., Panov, V. (Eds.) (1983). Philosophical Encyclopedic Dictionary. Moscow: Sov. Encyclopedia, 840.

Bakhtin, M. (2001). Problem text in linguistics, philology and other humanities. Anthology of World literary-critical thought twentieth century. Lviv: Chronicle, 416–422.

Gershunsky, B. (2002). Philosophy of education for XXI century: Textbook. Moscow: Russia Pedahohycheskoe Society, 512.

Barth, R. (2001). From the text of a work Anthology of World literary-critical thought twentieth century. Lviv: Chronicle, 491–496.

Tokman, G. (2003). Developmental Psychology as a source of scientific literature teaching methodology, 6, 23–29.

Published

2015-12-26

Issue

Section

Pedagogical Education