"Welfare rights" in the context of the practice of the united states supreme court

Authors

  • Andrianna Badyda State University "Uzhhorod National University" Narodna sq., 3, Uzhhorod, Transcarpathian region, Ukraine, 88000, Ukraine
  • Vasyl Lemak State University "Uzhhorod National University" Narodna sq., 3, Uzhhorod, Transcarpathian region, Ukraine, 88000, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/2523-4153.2017.119995

Keywords:

USA, Supreme Court, welfare law, social rights, rule of law

Abstract

The article aims to study the contents of the "welfare rights" in the United States in the context of the legal position of the Supreme Court of the United States. An analysis of key decisions of the Supreme Court concerning the protection of such rights is made. The authors came to the conclusion that the legal positions of the Supreme Court of the United States have undergone a long evolution in the sense of "welfare rights": from their complete rejection to the assessment in the coordinates of the rule of law principle, which is implicitly derived from the Constitution. It has been found that the Supreme Court links the protection of "welfare rights" (unwritten constitutional rights) with the protection of other rights, which are outwardly enshrined in the text of the Constitution (in particular, with the right to due process)

Author Biographies

Andrianna Badyda, State University "Uzhhorod National University" Narodna sq., 3, Uzhhorod, Transcarpathian region, Ukraine, 88000

PhD, Senior Lecturer

Department of Theory and History of State and Law

Vasyl Lemak, State University "Uzhhorod National University" Narodna sq., 3, Uzhhorod, Transcarpathian region, Ukraine, 88000

Doctor of Law, Professor, Corresponding Member of the National Academy of Legal Sciences of Ukraine, Head of the Department

Department of Theory and History of State and Law

References

  1. Salomatin, O. (2013). Verkhovnyi Sud SShA: osnovni etapy zakhystu konstytutsiinykh prav hromadian. Pravo SShA, 1-2, 113–121.
  2. Tushnet, M. (1992). Civil Rights and Social Rights: The Future of the Reconstruction Amendments. Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review. Available at: https://www.law.ufl.edu/_pdf/student-affairs/syllabus/fa13/tushnet_social_and_political_rights.pdf
  3. Dandridge v. Williams, 397 U.S. 471 (1970). Available at: https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/397/471/case.html
  4. San Antonio Indep. Sch. Dist. v. Rodriguez, 411 U.S. 1 (1973). Available at: https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/411/1/
  5. Shelley v. Kraemer, 334 U.S. 1 (1948). Available at: https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/334/1/case.html
  6. David, R., Zhoffre-Spinozi, K. (1999). Osnovnye pravovye sistemy sovremennosti. Moscow: Mezhdunar. otnosheniya, 400.
  7. Chernilovskiy, Z. M. (1982). Ot Marshalla do Uorrena: (Ocherki istorii Verhovnogo suda SShA). Moscow: YUrid. lit., 224.
  8. Adygezalova, G. E. (2006). Oliver Uendell Holms. Pravovedenie, 5, 184–196.
  9. Lochner v. New York, 198 U.S. 45 (1905). Available at: https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/198/45/case.html
  10. Goldberg v. Kelly, 397 U.S. 254 (1970). Available at: https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/397/254/
  11. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564 (1972). Available at: https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/408/564/case.html
  12. Baker v. Carr 369 U.S. 186 (1962). Available at: http://law2.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/conlaw/baker.html
  13. Supreme court of the united states. Available at: https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/pdf/11-393.pdf

Downloads

Published

2017-12-31

How to Cite

Badyda, A., & Lemak, V. (2017). "Welfare rights" in the context of the practice of the united states supreme court. ScienceRise: Juridical Science, (2 (2), 9–13. https://doi.org/10.15587/2523-4153.2017.119995

Issue

No. 2 (2) (2017)

Section

Juridical Science

License

Copyright (c) 2018 Andrianna Badyda, Vasyl Lemak

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Our journal abides by the Creative Commons CC BY copyright rights and permissions for open access journals.

Authors, who are published in this journal, agree to the following conditions:

1. The authors reserve the right to authorship of the work and pass the first publication right of this work to the journal under the terms of a Creative Commons CC BY, which allows others to freely distribute the published research with the obligatory reference to the authors of the original work and the first publication of the work in this journal.

 2. The authors have the right to conclude separate supplement agreements that relate to non-exclusive work distribution in the form in which it has been published by the journal (for example, to upload the work to the online storage of the journal or publish it as part of a monograph), provided that the reference to the first publication of the work in this journal is included.