Modern approaches to understanding the nature of action of oath
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15587/2523-4153.2018.153484Keywords:
oath, oath act, essence of oath action, duty, swear, promise, aspectsAbstract
Different science article that are devoted to the issue of oath are analyzed by the author. According to them, in the article are highlighted modern approaches to understanding the concept of oath and its relation with such legal categories as swear, duty, official duty, internal imperative and vow. With the help of comparison method, it has been found that, unlike the above concepts, the oath does not have a religious attribute, so the concept of such notions can’t be the same.
According to the analyzed science literature an interpretation on the two-aspect of the existence of the oath is made – doctrinal and normative. In accordance with the doctrinal aspect of the oath is considered as text, the administrative action, action of demonstration of internal convictions, moral authority and the deontological basis of professional activity. In the normative aspect, the oath is considered from the point of view of internal textual content, taking into account the common and different features of the content of the oath of representatives by various public state professions. It is installed that differences in oath are caused by the professional sphere of activity of the person, a common aspects is performing certain duties and comply with applicable law.
Also the part of the article is devoted for the medical oath, especially for its comparison of the “Hippocratic Oath” and modern oath for the doctors of Ukraine.
With the help of the classification method, an author's vision of the type of oath by the criterion of the sphere of professional activity is offered. In particular, it is proposed to establish the following types of oaths: political, judicial, legal and medical
References
- Kravchuk, O. L. (2015). Istorychnyi rozvytok poniattia "prysiaha" [The historical development of the concept of “oath”]. Naukovyi visnyk Mizhnarodnoho humanitarnoho universytetu. Seriia: Yurysprudentsiia, 13 (1), 107–111. Available at: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/Nvmgu_jur_2015_13%281%29__29
- Danyliv, S. (2016). Prysiaha yak administratyvnyi akt [The oath as the administrative act]. National law journal: teory and practice, 6 (22-1), 32–36.
- Tsurkan, M. I. (2010). Prysiaha suddi yak nevidiemnyi strukturnyi element yoho pravovoho status [The judge oath as nevid structural element of legal status]. Biuleten Ministerstva yustytsii Ukrainy, 12, 11–18. Available at: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/bmju_2010_12_4
- Rusakova, N. H. (2008). Prysiaha kak obshchepravovoi fenomen [The oath as a common legal phenomena]. Nyzhnyi Novhorod, 220.
- Maskovita, M. M. (2015). Teoretyko-pravovyi analiz poniattia "prysiaha” [Theoretical and legal analize of the noun “oath”]. Visnyk Natsionalnoho universytetu "Lvivska politekhnika". Yurydychni nauky, 825, 167–171.
- Krupka, O. V. (2015). Prysiaha u suspilnomu zhytti ta tsyvilno-pravovykh vidnosynakh Pravoberezhnoi Ukrainy u ХVІ – pershii polovyni ХVІІ st. [Oath in public life and civil law relations right-bank ukraine in the ХVІ – ХVІІ century the first half]. Istorychnyi arkhiv, 14, 72–79. Available at: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/Ians_2015_14_13
- Zernetskyi, P. V., Riabokon, H. L. (2014). Kontrastyvno-typolohichna kharakterystyka movlennievykh aktiv u dyskursiv brytanskoho ta ukrainskoho parlamenti [Contrastive-typological characteristics of speech acts in the discourse of ukrainian and british parliaments]. Naukovi zapysky. Filolohichni nauky, 164, 60–65. Available at: http://ekmair.ukma.edu.ua/bitstream/handle/123456789/3529/Zernetskyi_Kontrastyvno_typolohichna_kharakterystyka.pdf;jsessionid=3696E5693D72845034A7A9D8B9B92CF6?sequence=1
- Encyclopedia Brittanica. Available at: https://www.britannica.com/topic/oath-religious-and-secular-promise
- Shemshuchenko, Yu. S. et. al. (Eds.) (1998). Prysiaha. Yurydychna entsyklopediia. Kyiv: Ukrainska entsyklopediia. Available at: http://leksika.com.ua/14580814/legal/prisyaga
- Biletskyi, O.; Shynkaruk, V. I. et. al. (Eds.) (2002). Oboviazok. Filosofskyi entsyklopedychnyi slovnyk. Kyiv: Abrys, 742.
- Kheizinha, I. R. (1998). Knights of the Order and Knight's Vows. Autumn of the Middle Ages. Moscow, 90–101.
- Prysiaha. Ukrainska radianska entsyklopediia [Ukrainian soviet encyclopedia] (1974–1985). Available at: http://leksika.com.ua/14731015/ure/prisyaga
- Slyvka, S. S. (2003). Yurydychna deontolohiia [Juridical deontology]. Pravnycha etyka. Profesiina kultura. Kyiv: Atika, 320 p. Available at: http://textbooks.net.ua/content/view/3506/33/
- Shemshuchenko, Yu. S. et. al. (Eds.) (2001). Kliatva. Yurydychna entsyklopediia. Vol. 3: K-M. Kyiv: Ukrainska entsyklopediia, 792.
- Boshytskoho, Yu. L. (Ed.) (2012). Mala entsyklopediia konstytutsiinoho prava. Kyiv: Kondor-Vydavnytstvo, 462.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Olga Starytska
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Our journal abides by the Creative Commons CC BY copyright rights and permissions for open access journals.
Authors, who are published in this journal, agree to the following conditions:
1. The authors reserve the right to authorship of the work and pass the first publication right of this work to the journal under the terms of a Creative Commons CC BY, which allows others to freely distribute the published research with the obligatory reference to the authors of the original work and the first publication of the work in this journal.
2. The authors have the right to conclude separate supplement agreements that relate to non-exclusive work distribution in the form in which it has been published by the journal (for example, to upload the work to the online storage of the journal or publish it as part of a monograph), provided that the reference to the first publication of the work in this journal is included.
