Systematics of legal relations in agrobusiness

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/2523-4153.2020.210714

Keywords:

agrobusiness, legal relations, agrarian, chain, agricultural production, agricultural commodity producer, legal regulation

Abstract

The paper considers the systematics of legal relations in agrobusiness. The concept of legal relations in agrobusiness has been formulated. These relations are characterized by the fact that they include the process of development, production, logistics and sales of agricultural products; they are mainly regulated by the norms of the agrarian law; they arise between the clearly defined entities that are interested in agricultural products. The study object of the legal relations in agrobusiness is agrobusiness, the subject analyzed is the things (agricultural equipment) or property (land, agricultural products), intangible benefits (trademarks, geographical indication of goods) in respect of which there is an interest of the participants in this legal relationship. These relations have a primary centeredness to make a profit, and its derivative is meeting the needs of agricultural products’ consumers, ensuring national food security, developing rural areas, supporting environmental safety. They are characterized by private and legal nature as well as they are notable for their business cycle. We propose the classification of the legal relations in the field of agrobusiness that depend: 1) on the sphere of legal regulation: private (that enclose the relations, arising between the equal entities) and public (legal relations that involve an "unequal" entity and provided by the subordination to state bodies / local self-government); 2) on the direct implementation of economic activities: the relations in the field of agricultural innovations, production, processing, logistics and sales of agricultural products; 3) on the field of activity: internal and external; 4) on the nature of the relationship: property, organizational, organizational and property; 5) on the production system: production (basic) legal relations of agrobusiness, derivative (secondary) legal relations of agrobusiness

Author Biography

Ganna Korniyenko, Yaroslav Mudryi National Law University Pushkinska str., 77, Kharkiv, Ukraine, 61024

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Land and Agricultural Law

References

  1. Davis, J. H., Goldberg, R. A. (1957). A Concept of Agribusiness. Boston: Division of Research, Graduate School of Business Administration, Harvard University, 136.
  2. Goldberg, R. A. (1968). Agribusiness Coordination: A Systematic Approach to the Florida Wheat, Soy, and Orange Economy. Boston: Graduate School of Business Administration, Harvard University, 256
  3. Zylbersztajn, D. (2017). Agribusiness systems analysis: origin, evolution and research perspectives. Revista de Administração, 52 (1), 114–117. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.rausp.2016.10.004
  4. Chait, J. (2019). What Is Agribusiness? Available at: https://www.thebalancesmb.com/what-is-agribusiness-2538209
  5. Hamilton, S. (2016). Revisiting the History of Agribusiness. Business History Review, 90 (3), 541–545. doi: http://doi.org/10.1017/s000768051600074x
  6. Turnock, D. (1996). Agriculture in Eastern Europe: Communism, the transition and the future. GeoJournal, 38 (2), 137–149. doi: http://doi.org/10.1007/bf00186661
  7. Zinchuk, T., Kutsmus, N., Kovalchuk, O., Dankevych, V., Usiuk, T. (2017). Institutional Transformation of Ukraine’s Agricultural Sector. Review of Economic Perspectives, 17 (1), 57–80. doi: http://doi.org/10.1515/revecp-2017-0003
  8. Urkevych, V. Yu. (2007). Problemy teorii ahrarnykh pravovidnosyn. Kharkiv: Kharkiv yurydychnyi, 494.
  9. Savelieva, O. M.; Shulha, M. V. (Ed.) (2017). Pravove rehuliuvannia vidnosyn v ahrosferi. Kharkiv: Druk. Madryd, 208.
  10. Cameron, H. M. G. (2006). Trends in Agriculture and Agribusiness. Journal of Business & Finance Librarianship, 12 (1), 3–32. doi: http://doi.org/10.1300/j109v12n01_02
  11. Nosik, V. V.; Yermolenko, V. M., Kurylo, V. I., Semchyk, V. I. (Eds.) (2012). Predmet ahrarno-pravovoho rehuliuvannia v suchasnykh umovakh: teoretychni ta praktychni aspekty. Ahrarne pravo yak haluz prava, ahrarne nauka i navchalna dystsyplina. Kyiv: Vydavnychyi tsentr NUBiP Ukrainy, 26–28.
  12. Chabanenko, M. M. (2015). Stanovlennia ta rozvytok systemy ahrarnoho prava Ukrainy. Dnipropetrovsk: Vydavnytstvo «Hrani», 298.
  13. Simson, O. E. (2010). Innovatsiini pravovidnosyny. Problema identyfikatsii ta klasyfikatsii. Teoriia i praktyka intelektualnoi vlasnosti, 5, 98–104.

Downloads

Published

2020-07-10

How to Cite

Korniyenko, G. (2020). Systematics of legal relations in agrobusiness. ScienceRise: Juridical Science, (2 (12), 30–34. https://doi.org/10.15587/2523-4153.2020.210714

Issue

No. 2 (12) (2020)

Section

Juridical Science

License

Copyright (c) 2020 Ganna Korniyenko

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Our journal abides by the Creative Commons CC BY copyright rights and permissions for open access journals.

Authors, who are published in this journal, agree to the following conditions:

1. The authors reserve the right to authorship of the work and pass the first publication right of this work to the journal under the terms of a Creative Commons CC BY, which allows others to freely distribute the published research with the obligatory reference to the authors of the original work and the first publication of the work in this journal.

 2. The authors have the right to conclude separate supplement agreements that relate to non-exclusive work distribution in the form in which it has been published by the journal (for example, to upload the work to the online storage of the journal or publish it as part of a monograph), provided that the reference to the first publication of the work in this journal is included.