Types of abuse of law: theoretical and legal aspect

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/2523-4153.2020.216734

Keywords:

limits of the exercise of law, abuse of law, legal behavior, types of abuse of law

Abstract

The presented article examines the forms of abuse of rights. In legal science and legislation of Ukraine, the category of “abuse of rights” is legally vague and there is no agreed approach to defining the criteria for abuse of rights. The legislator often uses the institution of “abuse” as part of various legal structures, but does not legally establish the content of the general (generalized) concept of “abuse of rights”.  This creates problems both for legal practice, legal proceedings, and in the case of the exercise of rights by their owners and owners.

Abuse of law means the formally lawful behavior of the subject of legal relations, which leads to a violation of the rights and legitimates interests of others, incompatible with the fundamental principles of legal regulation.

However, the content of the term "abuse of right" (rights) is in the prescriptions; covers individual, sometimes different types of acts. Procedural legislation defines in more detail the content of "abuse of procedural rights", but does not provide an exhaustive list of such acts.  The official position of the legislator is that any abuse of rights is unacceptable.  Such legal norms are of a protective (prohibitive) nature; they do not always reveal the essence of abuse. The classification of actions on abuse of rights contains not only formal, purely theoretical significance, but, in essence, the classification allows, by identifying the most typical cases of the phenomenon under study, to establish trends in the emergence of new types and forms of abuse of rights and to determine the most effective methods and means of overcoming them.

The author determined the place of abuse of subjective rights in comparison with socially significant (legal) behavior. It has been established, that abuse of the right is not a type of legally significant behavior.  The author's understanding of the concept of "abuse of rights" and its types is offered

Author Biography

Tatiana Khokhlova, Yaroslav Mudryi National Law University Pushkinska str., 77, Kharkiv, Ukraine, 61024

Postgraduate Student

Department of Civil Law No. 2

References

  1. Konventsiia pro zakhyst prav liudyny i osnovopolozhnykh svobod (1997). Konventsiiu ratyfikovano Zakonom No. 475/97-VR. 17.07.1997. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/995_004
  2. Rishennia YeSPL u spravi «Merit proty Ukrainy» (2004). Available at: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-61685%22]}
  3. Rishennia YeSPL u spravi «N.B. proty Ukrainy» (2008). Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/974_321#Text
  4. Rishennia YeSPL u spravi «Rishennia u spravi Antonenkov ta inshi proty Ukrainy» (2005). Available at: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{%22fulltext%22:[%2214183/02%22],%22itemid%22:[%22001-71202%22]}
  5. Bakalinska, O. O. (2012). Nedobrosovisna konkurentsiia yak forma zlovzhyvannia subiektyvnym tsyvilnym pravom. Visnyk NTUU «KPI». Politolohiia. Sotsiolohiia. Pravo, 3, 141–145. Available at: http://visnyk-psp.kpi.ua/article/view/121242/116320
  6. Bazylevskyi, S. (2017). Zlovzhyvannia protsesualnymy pravamy. Zovnishnia torhivlia: ekonomika, finansy, pravo, 5, 13–19.
  7. Hubar, O. S. (2012). Klasyfikatsiia zlovzhyvannia tsyvilnymy pravamy za zakonodavstvom Ukrainy. Yurydychna Ukraina, 11, 93–100.
  8. Tykhomyrov, D. O., Kharchenko, M. P. (2016). Zlovzhyvannia pravom yak vidkhylennia vid pravomirnoi povedinky. Naukovyi visnyk Uzhhorodskoho natsionalnoho universytetu. Seriia «Pravo», 1 (38), 26–29.
  9. Khmil, M. M. (2003). Pryntsyp neprypustymosti zlovzhyvannia pravom. Visnyk Kharkivskoho natsionalnoho universytetu vnutrishnikh sprav, 24. Available at: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/VKhnuvs_2003_24_31
  10. Miletych, O. O. (2015). Zlovzhyvannia pravom: teoretyko-prykladnyi aspekt. Kyiv, 18. Available at: http://enpuir.npu.edu.ua/bitstream/123456789/7164/1/Miletych.pdf
  11. Baitin, M. I. (2005). Suschnost prava (sovremennoe normativnoepravoponimanie na grani dvukh vekov). Moscow: OOO ID «Pravo i gosudarstvo», 544.
  12. Rohach, O. Ya. (2011). Zlovzhyvannia pravom: teoretyko-pravove doslidzhennia. Uzhhorod: Lira, 368.
  13. Porotikova, O. A. (2002). Problema zloupotrebleniia subektivnym grazhdanskim pravom. Saratov, 206.
  14. Ibragimova, M. V. (2005). Zloupotreblenie subektivnym grazhdanskim pravom (Poniatie, suschnost, vidy i posledstviia). Riazan, 161.
  15. Tsyvilnyi kodeks Ukrainy (2003). Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy, 40-44, 356. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/435-15#Text
  16. Oksamytnyi, V. V.; Babyi, B. M., Koziubra, N. Y., Oksamytnyi, V. V. (Eds.) (1979). Pravovoe vospytanye y sotsyalnaia aktyvnost naselenyia. Kyiv: Naukova dumka, 327.
  17. Kazimirchuk, V. P. (1977). Sotsialnoe deistvie prava v usloviiakh razvitogo sotsializma. Moscow, 21.
  18. Nazarenko, E. V. (1970). Sotsialisticheskoe pravosoznanie i sovetskoe pravotvorchestvo. Kyiv: KGU im. T. Shevchenko, 38.
  19. Byrdin, E. N., Obukhova, M. A. (2011). Vidy iuridicheski znachimogo povedeniia: sravnitelno-pravovoi aspekt. Akademicheskii vestnik, 1, 60–63.
  20. Sergeev, A. P.; Sergeev, A. P. (Ed.) (2009). Osuschestvlenie grazhdanskikh prav i ispolnenie obiazannostei. Grazhdanskoe pravo. Vol. 1. Moscow, 521–524.
  21. Berzhel, Zh.-L.; Danilenko, V. I. (Ed.) (2000). Obschaia teoriia prava. Moscow: Izdatelskii dom NOTABENE, 576.
  22. Pokrovskii, I. A. (1998). Osnovnye problemy grazhdanskogo prava. Moscow: Statut, 113.
  23. Kot, A. (2013). Problema zlovzhyvannia subiektyvnym pravom u tsyvilnomu pravi Ukrainy. Visnyk Natsionalnoi akademii pravovykh nauk Ukrainy, 4 (75), 133–141. Available at: http://visnyk.kh.ua/web/uploads/pdf/ilovepdf_com-133-141.pdf
  24. Postanova Velykoi Palaty Verkhovnoho Sudu vid 17 zhovtnia 2018 roku u spravi No. 402/428/16-ts (provadzhennia No. 14-327tss18) (2018). Available at: https://verdictum.ligazakon.net/document/77361954
  25. Tsyvilnyi protsesualnyi kodeks Ukrainy No. 1618-IV. 18.03.2004 (2004). Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy, 40-41, 42, 492. Available at: http://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1618-15
  26. Ukhvala Rivnenskoho miskoho sudu Rivnenskoi oblasti vid 29 lypnia 2020 roku (sprava No. 569/2668/20) (2020). Available at: http://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/90710947
  27. Postanova Verkhovnoho Sudu vid 3 chervnia 2020 roku u spravi No. 318/89/18 (provadzhennia No. 61-128sv19) No. u YeDRSR – 89675396. Available at: http://www.reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/89675396
  28. Tarasenko, Iu. A. (2003). Zloupotreblenie pravom: teoriia problemy s tochki zreniia primeneniia stati 10 Grazhdanskogo kodeksa RF v arbitrazhnom protsesse. Available at: http://www.yurclub.ru/docs/civil/article59.html

Published

2020-12-25

How to Cite

Khokhlova, T. (2020). Types of abuse of law: theoretical and legal aspect. ScienceRise: Juridical Science, (4(14), 23–28. https://doi.org/10.15587/2523-4153.2020.216734

Issue

Section

Juridical Science