Digital technologies in the electoral process: theoretical aspects of compliance with democratic standards

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/2523-4153.2020.218559

Keywords:

digital technologies, electronic voting, elections, democratic standards, suffrage, electorate

Abstract

The article is devoted to the study of the acceptability of the introduction of digital technologies in the electoral process and their compliance with democratic standards.

It is indicated, that the Recommendation CM / Rec (2017) revised the problematic aspects of the legal regulation of electoral technologies in accordance with the current stage of development of science and information technology and today remains virtually the only agreed act, containing requirements for electronic voting. The most common digital technologies in the election process are highlighted: devices for direct recording of electronic voting without a paper ballot form; means of scanning the ballot; technical mechanisms for speeding up the counting of votes; online voting system via a computer or mobile device with Internet access; a device for voter identification online or at a polling station (including by recording fingerprints or the retina). The following essential principles of this method of election are summarized: clarity of procedure, reliability, stability of electoral legislation and broad public support.

The authors highlight the following advantages of the electronic election system - the presence of a coordinated, verified, labile voter register; increases administrative efficiency; reduces long-term costs of financial and labor resources; eliminates the possibility of manipulation; speeds up the counting of votes; improves political transparency; overcomes the problems of ignorance of the electorate.

The article proves that elections, referendums or other forms of democracy, conducted using digital technologies, must meet the requirements and general principles of suffrage. Legitimation of digital technologies is possible only in the absence of discriminatory advantages. Therefore, the possibility of using digital technologies is possible in the case of organizing the technical perfection of the electronic voting system and counting of votes, as well as their alternatives, along with the classic form of voting

Author Biographies

Iryna Zharovska, Lviv Polytechnic National University Bandery str., 12, Lviv, Ukraine, 79013

Doctor of Law, Professor

Department of Theory, History and Philosophy of Law

Institute of Law, Psychology and Іnnovative Еducation

Vitaliy Kovalchuk, Lviv Polytechnic National University Bandery str., 12, Lviv, Ukraine, 79013

Doctor of Law, Professor, Head of Department

Department of Theory, History and Philosophy of Law

Institute of Law, Psychology and Innovative Education

References

  1. James, T. S., Alihodzic, S. (2020). When Is It Democratic to Postpone an Election? Elections During Natural Disasters, COVID-19, and Emergency Situations. Election Law Journal: Rules, Politics, and Policy, 19 (3), 344–362. doi: http://doi.org/10.1089/elj.2020.0642
  2. WJP Rule of Law Index 2020. Available at: https://worldjusticeproject.org/our-work/research-and-data/wjp-rule-law-index-2020
  3. Katherine, E., Shein, E. (2020). Emergency Powers and the COVID-19 Pandemic: Protecting Democratic Guardrails. Interenational Foundation for Electoral Systems. Available at: https://www.ifes.org/news/emergency-powers-and-covid-19-pandemic-protecting-democratic-guardrails
  4. Simon, Z., Delfs, A. (2020). Orban Takes Sole Command of Hungary With Emergency Law. Bloomberg. Available at: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-03-30/orban-takes-sole-command-of-hungary-with-pandemic-emergency-law
  5. Gasimov, R. (2018). Electronic governance as a mechanism of public administration. Kyiv, 20.
  6. Marchenko, V. V. (2018). Elektronne uriaduvannia v orhanakh vykonavchoi vlady. Kharkiv: KhNADU, 290.
  7. Lizunova, O. D. (2019). Constitutional and legal bases of the Informational Support for elections in Ukraine. Kyiv, 20.
  8. Afanasyeva, M. V. (2015). Electoral Engineering in Ukraine: theoretical and methodological foundation and constitutional-legal support. Odessa, 35.
  9. Sensuse, D. I., Pratama, P. B., Riswanto (2020). Conceptual Model of E-Voting in Indonesia. International Conference on Information Management and Technology (ICIMTech). Bandung, 387–392. doi: http://doi.org/10.1109/icimtech50083.2020.9211156
  10. Prestone, S., Mbugua, S., Otanga, D. (2019). Security Shortcomings of Electronic Web Based Voting Systems for Universities in Kenya IOSR Journal of Computer Engineering, 21 (5 (II)), 1–9.
  11. Edwards, III S. B., Santos, D. (Eds.) (2020). Digital Transformation and Its Role in Progressing the Relationship Between States and Their Citizens. IGI Global, 231. doi: http://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-3152-5
  12. Russell, M., Zamfir, I. (2018). Digital technology in elections Efficiency versus credibility? BRIEFING European Parliamentary Research Service. Available at: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/document.html?reference=EPRS_BRI(2018)625178
  13. Recommendation CM/Rec 51 of the Committee of Ministers to member States on standards for e-voting (2017). Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 14 June 2017 at the 1289th meeting of the Ministers' Deputies. Available at: https://rm.coe.int/0900001680726f6f
  14. Code of Good Practice in Electoral Matters: Guidelines and Explanatory Report – Adopted by the Venice Commission at its 52nd session in Serbian CDL-AD(2002)023rev2-cor-srb (2002). Venice Available at: https://www.venice.coe.int/webforms/documents/?pdf=CDL-AD(2002)023rev2-cor-srb
  15. How is the National electoral register created? EUROPE. Available at: https://www.idea.int/data-tools/question-countries-view/735/Europe/cnt
  16. Is the Biomatric Date used in voter Identificftion at polling stations? Available at: https://www.idea.int/data-tools/question-view/739
  17. Global ID. Coverage, Barriers, and Use by the Numbers: Insights from the ID4D-Findex Survey (2017). The World Bank Group’s Identification for Development. Available at: http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/727021583506631652/pdf/Global-ID-Coverage-Barriers-and-Use-by-the-Numbers-An-In-Depth-Look-at-the-2017-ID4D-Findex-Survey.pdf
  18. Amelin, R. et. al. (2019). Blockchain Technologies for Electronic Voting: Legal Aspects. Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, X (5 (43)), 1382–1389.
  19. Olumide, S. A., Olutayo, K. B., E. Adekunle, S. (2020). A Review of Electronic Voting Systems: Strategy for a Novel. International Journal of Information Engineering and Electronic Business, 12 (1), 19–29. doi: http://doi.org/10.5815/ijieeb.2020.01.03
  20. Sen, A., Sen, M., Ambekar, A. (2016). Improved Electronic Voting Machine with Real Time Data Analysis. Communications on Applied Electronics, 6 (1), 47–49. doi: http://doi.org/10.5120/cae2016652420
  21. Araújo, R., Barki, A., Brunet, S., Traoré, J.; Clark, J., Meiklejohn, S., Ryan, P., Wallach, D., Brenner, M., Rohloff, K. (Eds.) (2016). Remote Electronic Voting Can Be Efficient, Verifiable and Coercion-Resistant. Financial Cryptography and Data Security. FC 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Vol. 9604. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. Available at: http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-53357-4_15

Downloads

Published

2020-12-25

How to Cite

Zharovska, I., & Kovalchuk, V. (2020). Digital technologies in the electoral process: theoretical aspects of compliance with democratic standards. ScienceRise: Juridical Science, (4(14), 4–10. https://doi.org/10.15587/2523-4153.2020.218559

Issue

No. 4(14) (2020)

Section

Juridical Science

License

Copyright (c) 2020 Iryna Zharovska, Vitaliy Kovalchuk

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Our journal abides by the Creative Commons CC BY copyright rights and permissions for open access journals.

Authors, who are published in this journal, agree to the following conditions:

1. The authors reserve the right to authorship of the work and pass the first publication right of this work to the journal under the terms of a Creative Commons CC BY, which allows others to freely distribute the published research with the obligatory reference to the authors of the original work and the first publication of the work in this journal.

 2. The authors have the right to conclude separate supplement agreements that relate to non-exclusive work distribution in the form in which it has been published by the journal (for example, to upload the work to the online storage of the journal or publish it as part of a monograph), provided that the reference to the first publication of the work in this journal is included.