On the implementation of the principles and features of the appointment of judicial examination in civil judicial proceedings

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/2523-4153.2021.235829

Keywords:

forensic examination, civil proceedings, principles of forensic examination

Abstract

The article is devoted to the aspects of the implementation of the principles and the specifics of the appointment of forensic examination in civil proceedings. The system of normative legal acts on forensic examination in civil proceedings has been investigated. The relationship between the concepts of "expertise" and "forensic examination" have been determined and analyzed. The characteristic features of forensic examination have been studied: first, forensic examination is determined by a specific procedural form; secondly, it can be carried out on the basis of a court order; thirdly, forensic examination is carried out by a forensic expert; fourthly, a correctly drawn up expert opinion is a means of proof in civil proceedings; fifth, the results of the forensic examination are used by the court. Highlighted and analyzed are the principles of forensic examination in civil proceedings, provided for by Art. 3 of the Law of Ukraine "On Forensic Expertise", namely the legality, independence, objectivity and completeness of the study. Separately, the set of conditions for which, in accordance with Art. 103 of the Civil Procedure Code of Ukraine, the court appoints an examination of the case: firstly, to establish the circumstances that may be significant for the case, for the sake of which special knowledge is required in a field other than law, without which it is impossible to establish the relevant circumstances; secondly, in the case when the parties or the party did not present the expert's opinion on a specific issue or the expert's opinion raises doubts about its correctness. A list of specific actions that the court at the stage of deciding on the appointment of a forensic examination has the right to implement in accordance with the Resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of Ukraine dated May 30, 1997 No. 8 "On forensic examination in criminal and civil cases" is provided. The aspects of the appointment and conduct of forensic examination in civil proceedings are analyzed. The facts are highlighted that should be taken into account when deciding on the advisability of appointing an examination in a civil case

Author Biographies

Larysa Bielik, National University Odessa Law Academy

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Criminalistics

Antonina Cheremnova, Odessa Scientific Research Institute of Forensic Expertise of the Ministry of Justice of Ukraine

PhD, Associate Professor, Scientific Secretary

References

  1. Averyanova, T. V. (2008). Sudebnaya ekspertiza. Kurs obschey teorii. Moscow: Norma, 480.
  2. Polishchuk, M. H. (2021). Examination as a form of use of special knowledge in civil process. Juridical Scientific and Electronic Journal, 3, 125–127. doi: http://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0374/2021-3/30
  3. Hrabovska, O., Vilinskyi, M. (2021). Expert in civil proceeding. Entrepreneurship, Economy and Law, (1), 5–10. doi: http://doi.org/10.32849/2663-5313/2021.1.01
  4. Kucher, T. M. (2012). Correlation of conclusions of expert and specialist yak of facilities of proving in civil procedure: questions of theory and practice. Visnyk Vyshchoi rady yustytsii, 2 (10), 31–40. Available at: http://www.vru.gov.ua/content/article/visnik10_03.pdf
  5. Shtefan, А. (2018). Statement of expert in civil proceedings. Teoriia i praktyka intelektualnoi vlasnosti, 2, 16–28. Available at: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/Tpiv_2018_2_4
  6. Lazko, O. M. (2013). Vysnovok eksperta yak zasib dokazuvannia v tsyvilnomu protsesi. Nauka i oborona, 4 (22), 106–112. Available at: http://naukaipravoohorona.com/journal/ukr/2013_4/18.pdf
  7. Derecha, L. N. (2013). History of forensic and expert institutions development. Teoriia ta praktyka sudovoi ekspertyzy i kryminalistyky, 13, 527–538. Available at: http://http://nbuv.gov.ua/j-pdf/Tpsek_2013_13_81.pdf
  8. Varfolomieieva, T. V., Honcharenko, V. H., Boiarov, V. I., Honcharenko, S. V., Popeliushko, V. A. (2011). Kryminalistyka. Akademichnyi kurs. Kyiv: Yurynkom Inter, 512.
  9. Popovich, I., Sviderskyi, A. (2019). Problemal issues on the appointment and conduct of forensic examination in commercial litigation. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science and Criminalistics, 20 (2), 190–206. doi: http://doi.org/10.32353/khrife.2.2019.14
  10. Zaiats, O., Skrynkovskyy, R. (2019). Problematic Aspects of Expert Participation in the Civil Procedure of Ukraine. Path of Science, 5(9), 3001–3011. doi: http://doi.org/10.22178/pos.50-3
  11. Pro sudovu ekspertyzu (1994). Zakon Ukrainy No. 4038-XII. 25.02.1994. Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy, 28, st. 232.
  12. Vasylieva-Shalamova, Zh. V. (2009). Sudova ekspertyza v tsyvilnomu protsesi. Kyiv.
  13. Krut, A. (2018). In relation to a review on the conclusion of judicial expert and legitimacy of its use in the legal proceeding. Advokat, 2, 36–37.
  14. Sehai, M. Ya., Foris, Yu. B.; Honcharenko, V. H. (Ed.) (2010). Naukovo-praktychnyi komentar do Zakonu Ukrainy «Pro sudovu ekspertyzu». Ekspertyzy u sudovii praktytsi. Kyiv: Yurinkom Inter, 400.
  15. Shulzhenko, A. V. (2016). Pryntsypy ta osoblyvosti sudovo-ekspertnoi diialnosti. Pravo i suspilstvo, 2 (2), 195–199. Available at: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/Pis_2016_2%282%29__37
  16. Tsyvilnyi protsesualnyi kodeks Ukrainy (red. 15.12.2017). Available at: https://i.factor.ua/ukr/law-343
  17. Pro sudovu ekspertyzu v kryminalnykh i tsyvilnykh spravakh (1997). Postanova Plenumu Verkhovnoho Sudu Ukrainy No. 8. 30.05.1997. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/v0008700-97#Text
  18. Uzahalnennia sudovoi praktyky pro zastosuvannia sudamy Kirovohradskoi oblasti protsesualnoho zakonodavstva pry pryznachenni sudovykh ekspertyz i vykorystannia yikh vysnovkiv u tsyvilnomu sudochynstvi. Available at: https://supreme.court.gov.ua/sud1190/150/1579
  19. Pro zatverdzhennia Instruktsii pro pryznachennia ta provedennia sudovykh ekspertyz ta ekspertnykh doslidzhen ta Naukovo-metodychnykh rekomendatsii z pytan pidhotovky ta pryznachennia sudovykh ekspertyz ta ekspertnykh doslidzhen (1998). Nakaz Ministerstva yustytsii Ukrainy No. 53/5. 08.10.98. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/z0705-98#Text
  20. Sikorski, M., Honing, A. (2012). Practical Malware Analysis: The Hands-On Guide to Dissecting Malicious Software. San Fransico: No Starch Press, 800.
  21. Zelstser, L. (2021). 5 Steps to Building a Malware Analysis Toolkit Using Free Tools. Available at: https://zeltser.com/build-malware-analysis-toolkit/

Downloads

Published

2021-06-30

How to Cite

Bielik, L., & Cheremnova, A. (2021). On the implementation of the principles and features of the appointment of judicial examination in civil judicial proceedings. ScienceRise: Juridical Science, (2(16), 33–38. https://doi.org/10.15587/2523-4153.2021.235829

Issue

No. 2(16) (2021)

Section

Juridical Science

License

Copyright (c) 2021 Larysa Bielik, Antonina Cheremnova

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Our journal abides by the Creative Commons CC BY copyright rights and permissions for open access journals.

Authors, who are published in this journal, agree to the following conditions:

1. The authors reserve the right to authorship of the work and pass the first publication right of this work to the journal under the terms of a Creative Commons CC BY, which allows others to freely distribute the published research with the obligatory reference to the authors of the original work and the first publication of the work in this journal.

 2. The authors have the right to conclude separate supplement agreements that relate to non-exclusive work distribution in the form in which it has been published by the journal (for example, to upload the work to the online storage of the journal or publish it as part of a monograph), provided that the reference to the first publication of the work in this journal is included.