Application of the right to suspension or complete or partial disclaimer of performance of the obligation in case of failure to fulfill the counter obligation by the counterpart

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/2523-4153.2023.273886

Keywords:

obligations, contractual obligations, non-fulfillment of obligations, refusal to fulfill obligations, suspension of performance, protection of civil rights, bilateral obligations, counter-obligations

Abstract

The article is devoted to the application of the right to suspension or complete or partial refusal to perform the obligation in case of non-performance of the counter-obligation by the other party, which provided for in Part 3 of Art. 538 of the Civil Code of Ukraine.

The purpose of the article is to determine the scope and mechanism of application of the creditor's right to suspension or partial or complete refusal to perform in case of default by the debtor (to which obligations the right applies and the mechanism of its implementation).

The material for the study was the scientific works of classic civilians in the field of compulsory, as well as modern research of Ukrainian civilian scientists.

Research results. In the course of the article, the author clarifies which responsibilities should be considered reciprocal, distinction between conflicting and interdependent responsibilities. The author highlights the application of Part 3 of Art. 538 of the Civil Code of Ukraine in case of non-fulfillment by the buyer of the obligation to prepay for the goods. It is proven, that the norm of Part 3 of Art. 538 of the Civil Code of Ukraine may be applied in certain cases to unilateral transactions. The legal nature of the right to suspend or refuse to perform a duty in full or in part has been clarified: the author has concluded that this is the way to protect civil rights and interests. It is noted, that the law under investigation can be applied in case of non-fulfillment of a negative obligation by the other party.

At the end of the article the conclusions, made by the author as a result of the research, are stated. In particular, it is stated, that the right to suspend or refuse to perform an obligation is applied in obligations, in which the performance is not simultaneous, but provides for a certain procedure for the parties to perform their duties. The specified right can be applied in case of non-fulfillment by the other party of the obligation of the basic duty, non-fulfillment of the auxiliary duty does not give the right to suspension or refusal of performance of the duty by other party

Author Biography

Valentyna Skrypnyk, V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University

Postgraduate Student

Department of Civil and Legal Disciplines

References

  1. Novitckii, I. B., Luntc, L. A. (1950). Obshchee uchenie ob obiazatelstvakh. Moscow: Iuridicheskaia literatura, 418.
  2. Ioffe, O. S. (1975). Obiazatelstvennoe pravo. Moscow: Iuridicheskaia literatura, 880.
  3. Tsyban, A. A. (2018). Subiektyvnyi tsyvilnyi oboviazok yak element zoboviazalnoho pravovidnoshennia. Kharkiv, 226.
  4. Nadon, V. V. (2017). Sub’iektyvnyi obov’iazok yak element zmistu tsyvilnykh pravovidnosyn. Kharkiv: Pravo, 392.
  5. Dzera, O.V., Kuznietsova, N. S. (2018). Tsyvilne pravo Ukrainy. Osoblyva chastyna. Kyiv: Yurinkom Inter, 1176.
  6. Jenks, E. (1892). The History of the Doctrine of Consideration in English Law. London, 225.
  7. Ashley, C. D. (1913). The Doctrine of Consideration. Harvard Law Review, 26 (5), 429–436. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/1326089
  8. Postanova vid 01.04.2020 r. u spravi No. 910/1102/20 (2020). Kasatsiinyi hospodarskyi sud Verkhovnoho Sudu. Available at: http://iplex.com.ua/doc.php?regnum=96172747&red=10000376b47e3bd887c3198bd21a19f26f1fa0&d=5
  9. Baranova, L. M., Banasko, O. O., Spasybo-Fatieieva, I. V. (Ed.) (2012). Tsyvilnyi kodeks Ukrainy. Naukovo-praktychnyi komentar. Tom 7. Zahalni polozhennia pro zobov’iazannia ta dohovir. Kharkiv: Straid, 736.
  10. Tolstoi, V. S. (1973). Ispolnenie obiazatelstv. Moscow: Iuridicheskaia literatura, 208.
  11. Gavze, F. I. (1968). Obiazatelstvennoe pravo (obshchie polozheniia). Minsk: Iz-vo BGU im. V. I. Lenina, 126.
  12. Sarbash, S. V. (2005). Ispolnenie dogovornogo obiazatelstva. Moscow: Statut, 640.
  13. Postanova vid 02.09.2020 r. u spravi No. 757/12906/19-ts (2020). Kyivskyi apeliatsiinyi sud. Available at: https://zakononline.com.ua/court-decisions/show/84536731

Downloads

Published

2023-03-31

How to Cite

Skrypnyk, V. (2023). Application of the right to suspension or complete or partial disclaimer of performance of the obligation in case of failure to fulfill the counter obligation by the counterpart. ScienceRise: Juridical Science, (1(23), 30–37. https://doi.org/10.15587/2523-4153.2023.273886

Issue

No. 1(23) (2023)

Section

Juridical Science

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Valentyna Skrypnyk

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Our journal abides by the Creative Commons CC BY copyright rights and permissions for open access journals.

Authors, who are published in this journal, agree to the following conditions:

1. The authors reserve the right to authorship of the work and pass the first publication right of this work to the journal under the terms of a Creative Commons CC BY, which allows others to freely distribute the published research with the obligatory reference to the authors of the original work and the first publication of the work in this journal.

 2. The authors have the right to conclude separate supplement agreements that relate to non-exclusive work distribution in the form in which it has been published by the journal (for example, to upload the work to the online storage of the journal or publish it as part of a monograph), provided that the reference to the first publication of the work in this journal is included.