Reorganization of economic organizations as a legal institute of economic law

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/2523-4153.2023.276366

Keywords:

reorganization, legal institute of Economic Law, economic organization, limited liability company, joint-stock company, economic legal relations, organizational and economic legal relations, balance of dispositive and imperative principles

Abstract

The state of the process of formation of such a legal creating as “the right to reorganize economic organizations” occurs through the gradual accumulation, unification, specialization and structuring of the necessary array of regulatory rules and procedures in this area and affects the determination of the place of this legal phenomenon in the system of national law.

It is established, that (1) reorganization legal relations are public relations, regulated by the norms of law that arise in the field of economic management in relation to the organization (including managing the activities) and the continuous implementation of economic activities; characterized by a special subject composition (economic organizations), a combination of organizational and property elements; reflection of private and public interests (its balancing), a significant degree of regulation, both by the state and by the subjects of these relations; (2) reorganization legal relations belong to economic legal relations by branch affiliation and constitute a kind of organizational and economic legal relations by nature.

It is substantiated, that by branch affiliation (identification), on the basis of clarification of the economic and legal nature of reorganization relations and compliance of the legal instruments (method) of Economic Law, the reorganization of economic organizations is an institute of Economic Law, such a legal creating that unites an interconnected set of economic and legal norms that are intended to regulate relations that develop in the field of termination and incorporation of economic organizations by reorganization in forms: merger, accession, division, spin-off, transformation.

It is determined, that in a structured form the economic and legal institute “reorganization of economic organizations” consists of interrelated and at the same time separate groups of economic and legal norms that are intended to regulate economic relations in the field of: 1) termination and incorporation of an economic organization through reorganization in appropriate forms (merger, accession, division, spin-off, transformation); 2) transfer of property rights and obligations from the legal predecessor (predecessors) to the legal successor (successors) on the basis of universal legal succession; 3) protection of the legitimate rights and interests of participants (shareholders), creditors, the state during the reorganization; 4) procedure for issuing and registering the issue of shares of joint-stock companies, which are incorporated by merger, division, spin-off, transformation, or to which accession is carried out; 5) state registration of termination and incorporation of an economic organization (economic organizations) by merger, division, transformation, or state registration of termination of an economic organization by accession and modification of constitutional documents, or state registration of incorporation of an economic organization by spin-off and modification of constitutional documents; 6) invalidating the reorganization procedure (nullity of the reorganization procedure). In addition, within these groups there is a further differentiation of norms depending on the forms of reorganization (merger, accession, division, spin-off, transformation) and the subject composition of reorganization relations

Author Biography

Nataliia Shcherbakova, Vasyl’ Stus Donetsk National University

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Civil Law and Procedure

References

  1. Yefymenko, A. (2002). Rehuliuvannia prypynennia (reorhanizatsii) ta likvidatsii yurydychnykh osib za proektom Tsyvilnoho kodeksu Ukrainy. Pravo Ukrainy, 10, 77–82.
  2. Bratus, S. N. (1950). Subekty grazhdanskogo prava. Moscow: Gosiurizdat, 367.
  3. Pietrov, Ye. V. (2014). Do pytannia pro formy reorhanizatsii hospodarskykh tovarystv. Naukovyi visnyk Uzhhorodskoho natsionalnoho universytetu. Seriia PRAVO, 2 (24), 82–85.
  4. Koroied, S. O. (2016). Problema pravonastupnytstva v tsyvilnomu i hospodarskomu sudochynstvi pry reorhanizatsii (zlytti) yurydychnykh osib. Sudova apeliatsiia, 2 (43), 55–60.
  5. Shishka, R. B. (Ed.) (2001). Predprinimatelskoe pravo Ukrainy. Kharkiv: Espada, 624.
  6. Marushchak, Ya. S. (2016). Korporatyvne pravo Ukrainy XX stolittia yak peredumova suchasnoho etapu yoho rozvytku. Aktualni problemy politky, 58, 266–275.
  7. Zhekov, D. (2014). Poniatie reorganizatcii iuridicheskogo litca: zakonodatelnyi i doktrinalnyi podkhody. Jurnalul juridic national: teorie si practica, 4, 105–108.
  8. Sishchuk, L. V. (2013). Teoretyko-metodolohichni pidkhody do rozuminnia poniattia reorhanizatsii. Aktualni problemy vdoskonalennia chynnoho zakonodavstva Ukrainy, 33, 32–36.
  9. Shcherbakova, (2021). Reorganization as Economic and Legal Phenomenon in the Economic Law. Pravo Ukrainy, 4, 144–166.
  10. Husariev, S. D., Tykhomyrov, O. D. (Ed.) (2017). Teoriia derzhavy ta prava. Kyiv: NAVS, Osvita Ukrainy, 320.
  11. Volynka, K. H. (2003). Teoriia derzhavy i prava. Kyiv: MAUP, 240.
  12. Tsvik, M. V., Petryshyn, O. V. (Ed.) (2009). Zahalna teoriia derzhavy i prava. Kharkiv: Pravo, 584.
  13. Topolevskyi, R. B., Fedina, N. V. (2020). Teoriia derzhavy i prava. Lviv: LvDUVS, 268.
  14. Bandurka, O. M. (Ed.) (2018). Teoriia derzhavy i prava. Kharkiv: Kharkiv. nats. un-t vnutr. sprav, 416.
  15. Pysmenytskyi, A. A. (Ed.) (2017). Teoriia derzhavy i prava. Melitopol: FO-P Odnoroh T.V., 298.
  16. Koziubra, M. I. (Ed.) (2015). Zahalna teoriia prava. Kyiv: Vaite, 392.
  17. Parkhomenko, N. M. (2008). Dzherela prava: problemy teorii ta metodolohii. Kyiv: TOV «Vydavnytstvo «Iurydychna dumka», 336.
  18. Kryzhanovskyi, A. F., Krestovska, N. M., Matvieieva, L. H., Skurikhin, S. M., Ivanchuk, V. Ye. (2022). Zahalna teoriia prava ta derzhavy. Odesa: Feniks, 257. Available at: http://dspace.onua.edu.ua/handle/11300/16058 Last accessed: 03.03.2023
  19. Zamorska, L. I. (2013). Instytut prava yak vyrazhennia pravovoi normatyvnosti ta yoho vlastyvosti. Pravove zhyttia suchasnoi Ukrainy. Odesa: Feniks, 1, 79–81.
  20. Chabanenko, M. M. (2015). Zahalna kharakterystyka ahrarno-pravovykh instytutiv. Yurydychnyi naukovyi elektronnyi zhurnal, 2, 127–131.
  21. Levytska, N. (2012). Normatyvno-pravovyi instytut: rozmezhuvannia z sumizhnymy poniattiamy. Chasopys Akademii advokatury Ukrainy, 4, 1–5.
  22. Havryliuk, A. M. (2004). Pravovyi instytut: peredumovy, pidstavy ta shliakhy formuvannia. Aktualni problemy derzhavy i prava, 22, 101–106.
  23. Andrieieva, O. B., Zhornokui, Yu. M. (Ed.) (2014). Hospodarske pravo Ukrainy. Ch. 1. Kharkiv: Khark.nats.un-t vnutr. sprav, 340.
  24. Laptev, V. V. (1969). Predmet y systema khoziaistvennoho prava. Moscow: Yuryd. lyt., 176.
  25. Vinnyk, O. M. (2009). Hospodarske pravo. Kyiv: Pravova yednist, 766.
  26. Znamenskyi, H. L., Mamutov, V. K. (1988). Khoziaistvenni mekhanyzm y pravo. Kyiv: Naukova dumka, 160.
  27. Shcherbakova, N. V. (2007). Pravovoe regulirovanie sliianiia i prisoedineniia khoziaistvennykh obshchestv. Donetck: Veber, 258.
  28. Shcherbyna, V. S. (2013). Hospodarske pravo. Kyiv: Yurinkom Inter, 640.
  29. Shcherbyna, V. S. (Ed.) (2012). Aktualni problemy hospodarskoho prava. Kyiv: Yurinkom Inter, 528.
  30. Hospodarskyi kodeks Ukrainy vid 16 sichnia 2003 roku No. 436-IV (2003). Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy, 18, 144. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/436-15#Text
  31. Kravets, I. M. (2010). Pravove stanovyshche sub’iektiv orhanizatsiino-hospodarskykh povnovazhen. Kyiv: Yurinkom Inter, 237.
  32. Smitiukh, A. V. (2018). Korporatyvni prava ta korporatyvni pai (chastky): teoretyko-pravovi aspekty. Odesa: Feniks, 662.
  33. Bobkova, A., Zakharchenko, A. (2019). Types of organizational and economic relations. Pravo Ukrainy, 8, 65–80.
  34. Vinnyk, O. M. (2004). Hospodarske pravo. Kyiv: Atika, 624.
  35. Shcherbyna, V. S. (2009). Hospodarske pravo. Kyiv: Yurinkom Inter, 640.
  36. Laptev, V. V. (1990). Reguliruemyi rynok i khoziaistvennoe zakonodatelstvo. Pravovedenie, 5, 57–62.
  37. Mamutov, V. K. (Ed.). (2002). Khoziaistvennoe pravo. Kyiv: Iurinkom Inter, 912.
  38. Znamenskii, G. L. (1996). Khoziaistvennoe zakonodatelstvo Ukrainy: formirovanie i perspektivy razvitiia. Kyiv: Naukova dumka, 63.
  39. Tsyvilnyi kodeks Ukrainy vid 16 sichnia 2003 roku No. 435-IV (2003). Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy, 40, 356. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/435-15#Text
  40. Rabinovych, P. M. (2007). Osnovy zahalnoi teorii prava ta derzhavy. Liviv: Krai, 192.
  41. Karavanskyi, S. (2000). Praktychnyi slovnyk synonimiv ukrainskoi movy. Kyiv: Ukrainska knyha, 480.
  42. Prokhorov, A. M. (Ed.) (1978). Bolshaia sovetskaia entciklopediia. Vol. 30. Moscow: Sov. entcikl.
  43. Tarakhonych, T. I. (2010). Efektyvnist pravovoho rehuliuvannia (pytannia teorii). Chasopys Kyivskoho universytetu prava, 2, 11–17.
  44. Skakun, O. F. (2009). Teoriia derzhavy i prava. Kyiv: Alerta; KNT; TsUL, 520.
  45. Lepekh, L. L. (2019). Sotsialna ta yurydychna efektyvnist mekhanizmu pravovoho rehuliuvannia. Kyiv, 234.
  46. Kolodii, A. M., Kopieichykov V. V. (Ed.) (2003). Teoriia derzhavy i prava. Kyiv: Yurinkom Inter, 368.
  47. Pro zakhyst ekonomichnoi konkurentsii (2001). Zakon Ukrainy No. 2210-III. 11.01.2001. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2210-14#Text

Downloads

Published

2023-03-31

How to Cite

Shcherbakova, N. (2023). Reorganization of economic organizations as a legal institute of economic law. ScienceRise: Juridical Science, (1(23), 4–14. https://doi.org/10.15587/2523-4153.2023.276366

Issue

No. 1(23) (2023)

Section

Juridical Science

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Nataliia Shcherbakova

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Our journal abides by the Creative Commons CC BY copyright rights and permissions for open access journals.

Authors, who are published in this journal, agree to the following conditions:

1. The authors reserve the right to authorship of the work and pass the first publication right of this work to the journal under the terms of a Creative Commons CC BY, which allows others to freely distribute the published research with the obligatory reference to the authors of the original work and the first publication of the work in this journal.

 2. The authors have the right to conclude separate supplement agreements that relate to non-exclusive work distribution in the form in which it has been published by the journal (for example, to upload the work to the online storage of the journal or publish it as part of a monograph), provided that the reference to the first publication of the work in this journal is included.